Human Rights Act 1998 and Conservative Party Proposals Evaluation
VerifiedAdded on 2022/08/28
|7
|1417
|20
Report
AI Summary
This report analyzes the Human Rights Act 1998 and its impact on UK law, with a specific focus on the Conservative Party's proposals for changing Britain's human rights laws. The report evaluates the accuracy of the Conservative Party's viewpoints, particularly concerning the role of UK courts in deciding human rights issues and the impact of Section 2 and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act. It examines the relationship between UK courts and the Strasbourg Court, as well as the concept of parliamentary sovereignty and democratic accountability. The analysis incorporates relevant case law, including cases like DPP vs. Raymond, Gormley and DPP vs. White, Panovits vs. Cyprus, Dayanan vs. Turkey, Pishchalnikov vs. Russia, and Brusco vs. France, to illustrate the practical implications of the Act. The report also includes a bibliography of books, journals, and legislation used in the analysis. The report concludes with an assessment of the potential consequences of the proposed changes to the Human Rights Act and the Bill of Rights.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 7