Ethics in Human Services: Exploring Utilitarianism and Diversity

This essay delves into the ethical considerations within human services, examining various perspectives and theories. It begins with a reflection on personal moral beliefs and then explores utilitarianism, analyzing its justification of lying under specific circumstances and differentiating between act and rule utilitarianism. The essay further discusses consequentialism in the context of youth work and human services, questioning its justification of lying to colleagues and clients. Additionally, it examines the ethics of diversity, specifically gender, by outlining how traditional ethical theories present a gendered view and how feminist ethicists propose remedies. The essay also discusses the importance of feelings in ethical judgments and the role of emotions in feminist ethics, providing a comprehensive overview of ethical principles and their application in human services.

Running head: Ethics in human service 1
The Ethics of Consequences: Utilitarianism
Student Name
Institution

Ethics in human service 2
Week 1, Chapter 1: The Moral Point of View
Complete “An Ethics Inventory: Discovering your own moral beliefs”, found on pp.
7-9 (Hinman, 2013). Provide a reflection on your results, highlighting areas of specific
interest.
Answer:
In light of the ethical perspective, there are numerous components in which a few people
are harmed because of fraud since it is unfair to the individuals who don't cheat, there are
inquiries based on character, there are additionally some questioned qualities that includes
loyalty and integrity. As indicated by a few philosophers, based on ethics, issues have been set
apart with the conditions that incorporate right, obligation and good. Fairness is additionally a
characteristic for a moral point. Survey feelings towards others is a piece of good qualities. We
can state ethics for moral health are considered nourishment. Alongside inequality, there is a
comparability amongst ethics and nourishment. Ethics originates from the Latin word ethic,
which implies and appropriate conduct. Ethical quality depends on the discrimination of actions,
decisions and expectations between the individuals who are viewed as right and who are viewed
as wrong. The moral is where instructing is done inside the moral code. Equality of profound
quality is great. The brilliant control of good code is that somebody must carry on with others
since they need to manage others. Building up your own code of ethics is a standout amongst the
most vital things you can improve the situation yourself. An individual code of ethics explicitly
states contemplations and dreams that are the pith of your life and enable you to state that I will
do this since I accept. A code of ethics is a record, which you can see each day for the update that
you accept, as well as to urge you to run your everyday schedule. Values are a part of us. They

Ethics in human service 3
say that we are remaining for whom. They can speak to our interesting, individual quintessence.
Value control our conduct, which gives us the Code of Conduct (Flew, 1979).
Chapter 5: The Ethics of Consequences: Utilitarianism
Consequentialist s argue that it is important to look at the outcomes of ethical
decisions before judging whether they are right or wrong.
5.1 Outline some of the reasons why utilitarian argue that under some circumstances
lying can be justified ethically.
5.2 Use an example to illustrate the difference between ‘act’ and ‘rule’ utilitarianism and
discuss some objections to each position.
5.3 Discuss consequentialism and lying in the context of youth work or human services
work. Does consequentialism justify lying to colleagues and clients?
Answer:
Act utilitarian is the aftereffect of a single act, where it has been more than once repeated
as the proportion of this act, for example, the rule was followed, this governing is a piece of the
utility. An illustration can be clarified, one goes to the specialist, the individual is sick and feels
the pain, and a progression of tests and examinations are performed by the specialist and the
individual returns to get the aftereffects of his analysis. The specialist knows about the way that
the individual is endangering life. As indicated by the act utilitarian, there will be a great deal of
pain and with the patient, his family will similarly be concerned and in a case that they lie, at that
point that individual has more opportunity to appreciate, so as indicated by the activity it is great
to lie. Real utilitarian trusts that if the doctor’s talks lie, he won't have the ability to trust in the
doctors. Mikey said that it is extremely unclear that if an applicant is given a position, at that
point he must be similarly distributed, or it must be based on any legitimacy. Accordingly, some

Ethics in human service 4
of the time it is permitted to break the certainty to offer joy to some individual. When utilitarian
have guaranteed that ethics involve finish results, they have to address numerous inquiries. As a
matter of first importance, they have to determine the measuring stick or standard in reference to
those outcomes. For the most part, clients guarantee that whatever we must do is deliver the
greatest utility. In any case, at that point, the utility must be characterized. Joy, bliss and
inclination fulfilment are the three most basic contender for the meaning of utility. Second,
utilitarian need to demonstrate how the outcomes can be estimated; That is, they must give a
record of how to apply the measuring stick to gauge utility. Thirdly, utilitarian need to tackle this
inquiry regarding the amount we must endeavour about how high their benchmarks are. While
utilitarianism has frequently been said as far as augmenting the utility, some have recently
recommended that not so much stringent but rather more achievable models of desires must be
considered. Fourth, utilitarianism should bring up what sort of things ought to be chosen as far as
their outcomes. Here are the three most normal competitors work, standards and social policies.
Finally, utilitarianism should answer the topic of who has the outcomes. Clearly, they are by all
account not the only consequences of individual operators; It will be a moral sense of self. Does
utilitarianism remember the outcomes for all humans or for a few subsets, for example, in our
nation? Do they consider future ages and in addition the aftereffects without bounds? Do they
remember all the touchy animals, creatures and the aftereffects of humans; The indigenous
habitat and additionally our manufactured world; or simply human populace. The utilitarian
guarantee that the main thing to compute morals, which delivers the biggest amount of utility, or
the biggest positive outcome (Mackie, 1991).
Chapter 10: The Ethics of Diversity: Gender

Ethics in human service 5
10.1 Explain three ways in which traditional ethical theories present a gendered view of
the world as if it were gender neutral.
10.2 Outline briefly how Gilligan proposes these deficiencies can be remedied.
10.3 Why do some feminist ethicists argue that feelings are important to judgements
about what is right and wrong?
Answer:
The thought depicted by gender impartiality is that discrimination on the basis of gender
by any institution or any social association must be kept away from when any part is thought to
be more reasonable for one sex than other sex. Policies intended to eliminate separation based on
sexual orientation can be supported by impartial supporters. These policies incorporate a similar
sex marriage, the conviction behind this approach is that the part of spouse or wife must not be
constrained to the preferences of sex. In the law, impartiality has changed the idea of a debate in
the guardianship of the tyke, which, not at all like prior, is making less positive for the lady. For
instance, rather than a policeman and a master, the cop's word or flight specialist must be
utilized. Alison Jager, who is a female scholar, expresses that customary ethics has left the
females from multiple points of view in which there is less worry for the enthusiasm of females,
the females aren't thought to be ethically moral contrasted with men , and independence, desire,
females, strength, war and death are overstated in human undertakings, and it lies on account of
ladies and the ethical contention of the male is constantly ideal, which demands principles and
rights, and the ethical contention of the female is less great, which underlines obligation and
connections.
In a different voice distributed via Carol Gilligan in 1982, she has said that the man has
worried on the independence of a person, and in addition emphasizing the privilege of people

Ethics in human service 6
and the highlight on the female is on care, and none of them, as per them the view is viewed as
prevalent. Each approach is helpful and socially settle different issues, numerous women's
activist has addressed moral rules which depend on conceptual principles. Women’s ethics has
constantly offered need to feel and this is because of male inclination, as per Held. As indicated
by the hypothesis, any activity by any female ethics won't be judged and feelings won't be
sacked; rather, they will also look at the enthusiastic sentiments behind the activity before
choosing anything on an ethical premise. Emotions will not only be accepted by any female
ethics made by the users, emotions will be embraced for ethical understanding, which includes
sensitivity to emotion, care, sense of belonging to others, through which ethics is directed can be
done.
Women's activist ethics is an endeavour to adjust, enhance, or reexamine customary
ethics, to the degree, it diminishes or lessens the ethical experience of ladies. Notwithstanding
others, women's activist logician Alison Jagger faults conventional ethics for leaving ladies in
five related ways. Above all else, it indicates little worry for ladies in contradicting issues and
interests of men. Second, customary ethics consider the ethical issues that emerge in the
supposed private world, in regions where ladies do homework and deal with kids, maladies and
the elderly. Thirdly, it infers that, by and large, ladies are not ethically developing or somewhere
down as men. Fourth, usual ethics crosses socially moral characteristics, for example, "freedom,
self-sufficiency, insight, want, war, pecking order, predominance, culture, inspire, item, gravity,
war and passing", while it is socially described by female manifestations Such as "common
dependence, network, association, sharing, feeling, body, conviction, progression, nature,
inhumanity, process, bliss, peace and nonattendance of life." Fifth, and in conclusion, it supports
the "male" techniques for moral thinking, which stresses rules, rights, all-inclusiveness and

Ethics in human service 7
reasonableness on the "female" strategies for moral contentions that accentuate relationships,
responsibilities, partiality and speciality.

Ethics in human service 8
Bibliography
Flew, A. (1979). A Dictionary of philosophy. Macmillan.
Mackie, J. L. (1991). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin Books. Retrieved 9 5, 2018