Ethical Considerations of Interoperable EHR Systems

This report delves into the ethical considerations surrounding the implementation and use of interoperable Electronic Health Records (iEHRs). It begins by defining iEHRs and highlighting their benefits, such as improved patient care, reduced costs, and enhanced access to information. The report then addresses key ethical concerns, including patient access to their health information, data privacy and security, and the potential impact on the patient-physician relationship. It examines the importance of regulations and policies in governing the use of iEHRs and discusses the challenges of balancing patient rights with the need for secure data management. The methodology involves secondary research, analyzing studies from various countries to identify and evaluate ethical issues. The report concludes by proposing potential solutions to mitigate these concerns, emphasizing the need for comprehensive policies, patient education, and robust security measures to ensure responsible and ethical iEHR implementation.

Running Head: ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 1
Ethical Concerns with interoperable Electronic Health Records (iEHR)
By: Haida Mahmoud
CD-ED HIM 209
Instructor: Ms. Sandra Cotton
March 2019

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 2
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................3
METHODOLOGY..........................................................................................................................5
Key terms and definitions:...........................................................................................................6
LIMITATIONS................................................................................................................................8
FINDINGS.......................................................................................................................................8
Ethical Concerns in iEHRs..........................................................................................................8
Potential Solutions to the Ethical concerns in iEHR..................................................................11
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................13
BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................................................................................13
2 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 3
Ethical Concerns with Interoperable Electronic Health Records
INTRODUCTION
Electronic Health Record is a record that contains the medical records of different patients
from different sources in a digital format. The records contain information such the physical
examinations, diagnosis, and treatment. Hospitals have started implementing EHR because of its
advantages. Some of its advantages include improved care quality, reduced costs of maintaining
paper-based systems, and improved access to health care information An EHR is challenged
ethically when patient details concerning their health are revealed without their consent. Patient
awareness of this issue may make them conceal some of their sensitive information which leads
to a compromised treatment. Therefore, Policymakers and other health personnel must come up
with policies which regulate access to electronic health care records.
BACKGROUND
To be able to ethically utilize the maximum potential benefits of interoperable Electronic
Health Records (iEHR), and to protect its privacy and confidentiality, the user should know what
the record contains, how the contents are collected and by whom, and how are they electronically
retrieved and transferred.
Health Records (HR) are quite significantly different from Medical Records (MR), just as the
word medical is different from the word health. Yet, they can be misused interchangeably. The
major difference is that MR is created, maintained, stored and destroyed by physicians in their
office. They contain information about the patient’s treatments and interventions in that office,
consultation notes, or test results requested by that clinician. MR can be accessed only by the
3 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 4
physician who is directly involved in the care of this patient. The physician identifies who if
anyone can view the information, including the patient about whom the information is collected.
True iEHRs are more comprehensive and broader; they are more about the total health of this
patient. They contain information from all clinicians, not just physicians, which are involved in
the care of this patient at any point in time. They are not just used by the facility that collected
the data, they are used by more than one healthcare organization. In addition to physicians, other
organizations that could collect and share health information are labs, specialists, nursing homes,
medical imaging facilities, emergency departments, pharmacies, or even schools. Therefore, the
iEHR gives a complete picture of the patient’s health history over time. This detail culled from
many sources helps the authorized care provider to give the most suitable health care when and
where it is needed.
iEHRs can tremendously improve the care of the patient by minimizing medical errors. The
iEHR is comprehensive and contains all the data related to the patient’s previous interventions,
current diagnosis, medication history, and possible allergies. With the clinicians’ ability to access
the iEHR, they can identify potential conflicts or contraindications of any treatment, or even
prevent adverse drug reaction. An iEHR increases the speed of providing necessary care, due to
the quick access to the patient’s record. There is no need to wait for information from other
sources or to wade through volumes of data, as it is significantly faster to transfer and retrieve
data through the iEHR than paper charts. The necessary information is available immediately,
and therefore the clinician can make decisions on care with speed.
Another benefit of the iEHR is cost efficiency. iEHR will eliminate the need for any record
storage freeing up the storage spaces which were initially used under the paper system. Also,
there will be no need for a person to manage thousands of files previously used in the paper
4 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 5
system. In addition to saving in storage spaces, EHR is cost-effective as it could prevent
duplicate tests. By accessing the patient’s health record, the physician can retrieve any previous
tests, labs, or imaging results, even if it was requested by another physician from a different
health institute.
As all technology innovations are a double-edged sword, they are a tool of convenience and a
possible threat; EHR facilitates and improves the delivery of health care, while it could create
conflicts among various ethical principles. By their very nature, iEHRs contain sensitive and
personal information; they should be kept private and confidential. Those with access to the data
and information contained within should maintain the confidential nature and be governed by
privacy laws, regulations, and health policies without compromising the humanistic elements.
Provincial, territorial and federal governments share responsibility in the creation,
implementation, and enforcement of policies, laws, and standards regulating the use of iEHRs.
Despite this, there are still some gray areas regarding the use of these records. One of the major
issues is that of access to the information by the patient. While there is an agreement that
patients should be able to access their information, the right of access is not absolute. Patients
accessing the results of their report before discussing them with their physician could result in
misinterpretation of these results. Other issues include the impact of documentation on the
patient-physician relationship, or the implementation and use of the EHR impacting the face-to-
face time in examining the patient, and more. This paper identifies and discusses the research
related to some of these ethical considerations while handling EHR, and their potential solutions.
Paper Records vs iEHR
For every patient who have had a doctor appointment and found that doctor
detailing health medical records on a piece of paper can testify on how inconveniencing
5 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 6
that approach is because the doctor does not grasp all the concepts as he scribbles to
write. This is in comparison to a different case where the doctor types on a computer.
Although the two scenarios involve medical records, there is a big difference. Paper
records requires additional personnel to support and handle paper files while an iEHR
will require less personnel, time and no physical storage space. Although some initial
costs will be experienced as the iEHR is implemented, the costs of medical record
keeping will reduce significantly over time.
Also, there is no privacy and protection of patient’s medical information under
paper based records. This is because anybody can access the medical records and read
them. However, this is not the case with iEHR where there is access control. Access
control has been implemented in the system to limit access to patient’s medical
information. For instance, one patient will not be able to access medical records for
another patient because he or she does not have the right to access. A doctor will be able
to access the same information because he or she has the right of access. This will
improve the confidence of patients when disclosing their medical records.
METHODOLOGY
The electronic health record is just like any product of technology, it comes with unavoidable
side effects. This paper covers the ethical concerns as one of these side effects of EHR.
Secondary research is the method used in this paper. Data were extracted and analyzed
from previous research and studies on the topic of ethical considerations in iEHRs. The research
has been culled from studies conducted in Canada, USA, England, and Switzerland. USA
6 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 7
research was used because America is well known as an advanced industrialized country that has
invested a lot of money into iEHRs; England has the closest healthcare system to the Canadian
Medicare, and Switzerland has the highest satisfaction rate from its citizens regarding the
healthcare system.
Key terms and definitions:
EHR: Health information about one person who is available from multiple sources spanning
time, that is collected, saved, and which can be shared electronically.
Ethical: Morally approved
Pathological Report: a medical record that contains details about the diagnosis based on a
detailed examination of a specific tissue.
CHIMA: Canadian Health Information Management Association, the certifying body and
national association that represents leadership and excellence in health information management
(echima.ca).
Canada Health Infoway: independent, federally funded, not-for-profit organization that is
responsible for the implementation of iEHRS across Canada.
Security: protecting health records from unauthorized access.
Secondary data: data that has been collected by someone other than the current user.
De-identified Dataset: data that has been stripped of all elements that might alone or in
combination, identify a person
Re-identified Dataset: anonymous data that has been matched with public information to identify
the individual
7 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 8
There were numerous/hundreds of articles/citations found regarding EHR ethical
concerns. After filtering the search results to articles from the last 10 years, written in English,
and about specific countries that are in some way relevant to the Canadian Health System, 10
articles were identified.
Only credible research was used in this paper. These research papers were posted on
popular sites, some governmental, with identified authors and peer-reviewed.
American based sites:
-AMA Journal of Ethics: published by the American Medical Association. Its articles are peer-
reviewed, and the board members are recognized leaders in Philosophy and Ethics and Ethical
policies.
-NCBI.com: The National Centre for Biotechnology Information is a comprehensive database
that is a source of accurate, science-based information.
-Sciencedirect.com: contains accredited scholarly journals.
Canadian based sites:
-eCHIMA.com: The Canadian Health Information Association is the professional association of
certified Health Information Management HIM professionals in Canada.
-Infoway-inforoute.ca: non-profit Canadian organization that is responsible for the development
and adoption of the EHR.
European based sites:
-Theroyalsocietypublishing.org: publishes peer-reviewed articles of a healthcare system that is
somewhat similar to the Canadian system.
8 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 9
-Smw.ch: The Swiss Medical Weekly journal has peer-reviewed articles that are published by the
Swiss medical publisher.
LIMITATIONS
Articles selected were published in countries that have a health care system like the
Canadian one (England); countries that have relatively high success rate (Switzerland); or a
country with an advanced medical field (USA). Only peer-reviewed articles were used/analyzed
in this paper. The language was another limitation as in Canada and Switzerland many research
studies were written in French, the English ones are what the ones which were used in this paper.
Also, not all the articles were free to access; seven of the articles required me to have a
membership or a fee, so these articles were not used.
FINDINGS
Ethical Concerns in iEHRs
o How and what information a patient can access in his or her portal: There exists
no directive regarding how and when a patient should obtain access his or her health details in
some of the critical health examinations like HIV testing. Research shows that about 7% of
patients found the information in the portal disturbing and confusing. According to experts the
period of time before giving patients access to information via a portal varies. This is because
some of the health information might be disturbing to the victim like HIV status and cancer
results. Things like radiology and cytology tend to take more time. A test like HIV may take up
to 28 days to allow for follow up and appointments. This is often in the case of positive patients.
Attempts have been made to allow automated delays but have not been as successful. Items that
9 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 10
may sometimes seem like routine laboratory can be similar to anatomic pathology which may be
potentially upsetting. Legally and ethically, patients can access their medical records as they
have ownership of this information. This is satisfied by the existence of The Canadian Data
Protection Act, The Access to Health Records Act and The Medical Reports Act. Elderly parents
can also designate their children to access their medical records. Likewise, legal guardians of
minors can access their medical records. However, for minors access can be denied if it is proven
that the minor and the medical provider have a confidential relationship. Another case is when
the court orders a medical care for the child. Yet, this authority might be challenging to the
healthcare providers when they document sensitive information regarding substance abuse,
sexual behavior, or even taking notes about their physical appearance during the clinical visit. In
this case, physicians might leave this information vague knowing that the patients might access
these records. This may lead to misleading medical advice and may be followed by adverse
healthcare outcomes.
What are portals?
Basically, a portal is a framework used to integrate and support processes, people and
information across an information system. Through a portal, iEHR users will get a secure and
unified gateway for their medical records. As an application interface, the portal will provide
instant deployment, centralized maintenance and ergonomics which are intuitive and user-
friendly. The main functions of a portal in iEHR will be the integration and presentation of
medical records. The portal will be able to extract information from different sources and adjust
it into a consistent and understandable form. Through the portal, it will be easy to integrate
patient’s medical records, which will provide an integrated navigation gateway for multiple
systems and components. Another functionality provided by a portal is customization, which will
10 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 11
provide an environment for users of the system to customize their information. A portal will
provide access control and security. This is in consideration to its ability to give the limitation
needed for the access of medical records. Through the portal, the system administrator will easily
designate the access control needed before accessing medical records.
o Patient-Physician relationship: patients are the center of the attention during a
clinical visit, and providing the best healthcare is the ultimate goal. But with the use of iEHR,
physicians might be distracted from paying full attention to the patient, ensuring the electronic
data requirements have been fulfilled. Electronic data requirements refer to the set of
specifications that data to be input in the electronic health records must meet. As a consequence,
they miss some psychosocial and emotional cues that could help in drawing the full picture of the
patient’s health and current diagnosis. Missing those cues may result in not understanding the
full health of the patient, which could lead to sub-optimal care.
o Face-to-face time in examining the patient: physicians are required to comply
with many documentation requirements. Such as, what to document which is based on accuracy,
relevance, completeness, timeliness and confidentiality factors which govern documentation of
medical records and gathering sufficient clinical data to make the best possible medical
decisions. These requirements may add time pressure on direct patient’s care. This may lead to
insufficient or inaccurate medical care being provided to the patient. With iEHR, this is not the
case because confidentiality and privacy and integrity of patient data are enforced at the software
level. This is to imply that data on patient health status will all be availed by the patient with an
security measures implemented at the system level.
o Patient’s Lack of confidence in the security of EHR: the use of EHR should
improve communication and foster trust between the patient and the healthcare provider. Patients
11 | P a g e

ETHICAL CONCERNS WITH INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (IEHR) 12
sometimes avoid disclosing important information or even seek medical help due to the lack of
trust in the iEHR, thinking that a family member or an outsider could gain access to this
information. This act will not complete the puzzle for the physician to make the best medical
decisions or treatment plans.
o Demands for Secondary Data: Secondary data refers to data which is collected by
someone other than the user. Secondary users refer to users of data to which they were not the
primary users which may include researchers, public health organizations. In this case, patients
must be informed earlier on before registering in the system because some of them may not want
their information to be accessed or used by any of these agents
o Public Health Organizations as secondary users: These are organizations that
focus on the prevention of diseases, prolonged life and promoting human health through
organized efforts and informed choices of society, communities, and individuals. Examples
include the WHO (World Health Organization). Public health information is important for
monitoring health, evaluating and improving health care service delivery.
The need of secondary use of personal medical information is high, and patients must be
informed of the potential use of their information when registering at the iEHR so that they can
make a decision whether to register or not. This is in consideration of the fact that some
companies like insurance companies may wish to obtain health information about their clients
who may not be willing to disclose because of various reasons. Pharmaceutical companies want
health diagnosis and medication information to market drug products to patients and their
physicians (Goldberg, 2000). Unauthorized disclosure of personal health information by buying
this information from some EHR vendors is becoming a great concern. To avoid this scenario,
patients can refuse their personal information to be saved in EHR. But in this case, another
12 | P a g e