Critical Analysis: Intermittent Power Sources Replacing Fossil Fuels

This report critically analyzes the feasibility of replacing fossil fuels with intermittent power sources. It begins by introducing intermittent power sources and fossil fuels, outlining their characteristics and applications. The paper argues that while fossil fuels have significant environmental drawbacks, intermittent sources alone cannot entirely replace them due to storage challenges, inconsistency, and cost. The report presents arguments both for and against the replacement, supported by scholarly articles, and concludes that intermittent sources should complement fossil fuels rather than completely replace them. The importance of fossil fuels in industries and daily life, the economic impact of switching, and the unreliability of intermittent sources are highlighted. Conversely, the environmental benefits of renewable sources are discussed, including the reduction of global warming and pollution. The report emphasizes the need for a balanced approach, considering both the benefits and limitations of each energy source. The analysis includes the financial implications of the transition, the technological challenges, and the need for continued research and development in renewable energy technologies.

Running head: INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 1
The Impact of Intermittent Power Sources to Replace Fossil Fuels
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 2
Introduction
Intermittent Power Sources are energy sources that are not always available for usage
(Borenstein, & Bushnell, 2015). They include the renewable sources of energy. Moreover, the
storage of the intermittent sources is nearly impossible. The sources are predictable but do not
satisfy the requirements of power systems. When solely relied on, the sources take the place of
other sources that can be stored for future use. However, intermittent power such as electricity
can be stored for the future. The storage can be through batteries and coupling through the
application of electrodes (Borenstein, & Bushnell, 2015). On the other hand, fossil fuels are
energy sources that contain hydrocarbons (McGlade, & Ekins, 2015). Fossil fuels do not
originate from flora and fauna.
Examples of fossil fuels include coal, gas, and hydrocarbons (Covert, Greenstone, &
Knittel, 2016). The fuels assist in industrial set-ups that require an ample supply of consistent
fuel. However, they are non-renewable as compared to the intermittent sources that are
renewable. Fossil fuels are responsible for the increased levels of global warming (Boykoff et al.,
2018). The world should turn from fossil fuels to the renewable sources of energy. However, the
intermittent sources posses a difficulty in storage. Furthermore, they are inconsistent and
expensive when used in large quantities. Therefore, the intermittent power sources cannot
entirely replace the fossil fuels. This paper will support the fact that fossil fuels are irreplaceable.
The essay will also explore contrary opinions.
The Impact of Intermittent Power Sources to Replace Fossil fuels
The Intermittent Power Sources cannot replace the fossil fuels. Fossil fuels include
natural gas, petroleum, oil, and coal (Hertwich et al., 2015). The fuels originate from flora and
fauna that existed decades ago. The extinct animal and plant extracts occupy the bedrocks of the

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 3
lithosphere. The combinations of the flora and fauna form materials that are combustible and are
used as fuel in the modern era. The fossil fuels are used in almost every aspect of life. Replacing
the fuels with renewable sources can only distort the daily running of human activities.
Individuals heavily rely on fossil fuels to cook food in their residential areas (Hertwich et al.,
2015). Moreover, the energy sources are essential in starting the cars and running corporate
offices. The manufacturing industries also use fossil fuels to conduct their activities.
The numerous and unending application of fossil fuels creates an undesirable impact if
renewable sources replace them. However, the continuous use of fossil fuels is responsible for
the worrying trends of global warming in the United States and around the world. Therefore,
individuals need to minimize the usage rather than replacing them with renewable sources.
Renewable energy originates from natural means. Examples of the causes of renewable energy
are wind and sunlight (Delman, Stephenson, Davis, & Diffenbaugh, 2015). Other reasons include
bio-energy and hydropower. Geothermal power and ocean energy are also sources of renewable
energy. The significant areas of application of intermittent energy include heating processes and
electricity (Delman et al., 2015). Other uses are in the transport industry and the cooling sector.
The intermittent sources yield six percent of total energy requirement in the world
(Jacobson et al., 2015). Therefore, energy from fossil fuels offers the large chunk of the
remaining ninety-four percent. Thus, replacing fossil fuels with intermittent sources would
deprive the world of power. Without energy, the world cannot run its daily activities hence the
fossil energy is there to stay. When industries burn fossil fuels to produce electricity, they release
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The gas is the primary cause of global warming and the
change in climatic conditions around the world (Jacobson et al., 2015). During global warming,
the atmospheric temperature escalates thereby causing the suffering of the marine life. The

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 4
animals and plants also feel the effects of global warming. However, a change from fossil energy
to intermittent energy does not scale down the levels of global warming in the world. The
industrial growth in the United States and population surge entirely depend on fossil energy
(Jacobson et al., 2015). Without the non-renewable sources, the industries would collapse
therefore leading to economic decline. A reduction in the total population would reduce the labor
force leading to recession.
The importance of fossil fuels has made the members of the globe look after the sources
thoroughly. The reserves of fossil fuels have been depleting since the beginning of the nineteenth
century. The depletion is a significant concern since the energy is non-renewable and more than
half of the world's population depends on it. The fossil energy is readily available all over the
world, and most people can afford them. However, intermittent power such as electricity is
inconsistent and a significant population cannot access nor provide it (Kaplan, 2015).
Intermittent sources are not viable, and humans cannot rely on them for all their energy needs.
Most of them are expensive and not consistent in their applications. Therefore, renewable energy
cannot replace fossil fuels. However, the intermittent forms should only complement fossil
energy.
Preference of fossil fuels over Intermittent Power Sources
The switch from fossil fuels to intermittent sources is an uphill task. The process is cost
ineffective and would have a significant impact on the economy of the United States (Vidal-
Amaro, Østergaard, & Sheinbaum-Pardo, 2015). Therefore, the States should stick to fossil fuels
in the large scale industrial processes. Intermittent power sources should only compliment the
non-renewable source but not replace them entirely. Harnessing intermittent energy is expensive
as the operation requires highly sophisticated equipment and technology. Moreover, skilled

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 5
human resources is necessary for transforming from fossil fuels to renewable sources.
Furthermore, the renewable energy is not consistent hence disrupts industrial functions and other
economic activities. There are days when the weather calms and devoid of wind currents.
Moreover, during the winters, the sun rays are weak and cannot be harnessed to yield energy.
Therefore, during those occasions, human activities and industrial operations suffer setbacks.
The complete switch from fossil fuels to renewable sources requires massive capital
investment and time to actualize. Therefore, the States has to continue to embrace non-renewable
energy until the country can afford a complete transformation. Moreover, the technology of
producing sufficient intermittent power is expensive, inconvenient and problematic in
application. The intermittent source cannot provide enough energy that the world requires to run
the industries, offices and the homes (Vidal-Amaro, Østergaard, & Sheinbaum-Pardo, 2015).
When harnessed for forty years, the wind and solar energies cannot produce more than two
percent of the globes' energy requirements. The statistic is because the sun and wind are
inconsistent natural resources. Therefore, the world needs non-renewable energy to complement
the intermittent sources. Therefore, overdependence on the winds and the sun would make the
globe to run out of power.
Other Insights supporting Fossil fuels over intermittent sources
Wind and Solar sources of renewable energy are unreliable and depend on the conditions
of weather. In the periods of calm weather, the wind is a limited resource thereby interfering with
the activities of people who over-rely on it (Krieger, Casey, & Shonkoff, 2016). On the other
hand, there are insufficient sun rays during autumn and winters. Therefore, individuals have to
wait for the summer to utilize the radiation energy. Thus, there is need to store renewable sources
to curb the unpredictability of the conditions of the atmosphere. The storage of the renewable

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 6
sources is expensive and less effective. Therefore, non-renewable sources are necessary to
complement the intermittent energy. Countries cannot use intermittent power sources in solitary.
The usage of intermittent power sources such as electricity costs a fortune as compared to
the utilization of the fossil fuels. The government has to heavily invest in electric supply to cut
the costs that the citizens pay for the power. Moreover, large parcels of land are required to
produce sufficient electrical power. The massive amount of money that the national executive
spends can be channeled into the other sectors of the economy (Krieger, Casey, & Shonkoff,
2016). Moreover, the large pieces of land minimize the space for agricultural activities. On the
other hand, fossil fuels require little space and low capital investment. Therefore, fossil fuels are
better than intermittent power sources. There is an increasing demand for fossil fuels in the
world. The number of people who require the natural gas to prepare their meals is increasing on a
daily basis. A significant world population is also using coal in their homes (Krieger, Casey, &
Shonkoff, 2016). Intermittent sources cannot help in running the office, homes, and the
industries.
Reasons for replacing fossil fuels with Intermittent power sources
The fossil fuels release carbon dioxide with causes global warming and change of
climate. Carbon dioxide has not more than two chains of carbon. Compounds that have up to two
strings are the most lethal causes of global warming. The effects of global warming are
dangerous to the existence of humans, animals, and plants (Ellabban, Abu-Rub, & Blaabjerg,
2014). If human beings desist from harnessing fossil fuels for energy, the chances of global
warming reduce by half. Moreover, the fossil fuels are non-renewable sources of energy. Once
they have been exploited, they cannot be replenished. Therefore, utilizing the fossils for fuel

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 7
leads to land degradation. The world should hence switch to the renewable energy to save the
world from the undesirable effects of global warming.
When harnessed and appropriately utilized, the intermitted sources are sufficient to cater
for the energy needs of the world. Moreover, the power from the intermittent sources is reliable
and safe. The exploitation of fossil fuels leads to environmental and air pollution due to the
emission of dangerous gases into the atmosphere. However, the production of electricity is
pollution free hence preventing the spread of pulmonary diseases and other airborne
complications. The national administration should spread the renewable sources on a large scale
(Murakami, Ida, Tanaka, & Friedman, 2015). The renewable sources that require committed
attention are wind, solar, and biogas sources. Moreover, the government can also invest in
geothermal, biomass, and ocean energy.
The government should use modern technology to manage and track the patterns of
energy utilization. The same technological advancement can offer both flexible energy and
storage facilities for the renewable sources. Therefore, there is no need to use fossil fuels when
intermittent sources can serve a wide area. The sunrays in a day have enough energy to last for
one whole year. Therefore, the power engineers should use the relevant methods to convert
sunlight into energy and presence the fossils. Over the past five years, the costs of electricity and
other renewable energy sources have reduced significantly (Sovacool, & Drupady, 2016). Fossil
fuels such as coal and natural gas are now expensive than electric power. Therefore, people
should opt for renewable sources to sustain the economy.
Fossil fuels are expensive due to their environmental and health impacts. The pollution
due to the exploitation of fossil fuels causes human diseases. The government spends a fortune in
the healthcare department due to fossil fuels. The national executive can cut on its health budget

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 8
when it invests on intermittent sources. The technology for producing renewable power is
affordable for the government. Moreover, renewable energy does not affect the plants and
animals like the exploitation of fossil fuels. The mining activities to retrieve coal deprive the
natural land of its fertility. Therefore, the pants experience stunted growth due to insufficient
nutrients, and they die off. The animals depend on the plants for feeding. Once the plants die, the
animals also die. Humans consequently lack food; thus, fossil fuels have far-reaching effects
(Noori, Kucukvar, & Tatari, 2015). The governments should switch to intermittent sources to
prevent food shortages.
The demand for electricity is increasing in the developing countries. The states require
electricity to run their industrial operations. Electric power is also needed at homes for lighting
purposes (Vasileiadou, Huijben, & Raven, 2016). The world governments should embrace
renewable energy to enhance industrial growth (Strachan, Cowell, Ellis, Sherry‐Brennan, &
Toke, 2015). Moreover, the heat from fossil fuels cannot compliment electricity for lightning.
Finally, renewable sources are safe to the environment.
Conclusion
The intermittent power sources should not replace fossil fuels. Preferably, the renewable
sources of power should complement the non-renewable ones. The impact of intermittent power
sources over fossil fuel would decrease energy supply to the world. Fossil fuels are in high
demand as they are needed in homes, offices, and at industrial set-ups. Moreover, the fossil fuels
are constant whereas the renewable ones are inconsistent. The costs of exploring fossil fuels are
cheaper than that of acquiring the intermittent power sources. The exploration of fossil fuels goes
on regardless of weather changes. Moreover, the energy sources can serve a large number of
people.

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 9
The fossil fuels have few shortcomings when compared to the renewable sources. The
fossil fuels are non-renewable hence their exploitation leads to environmental degradation. The
fuels also lead to global warming due to the emission of carbon dioxide gas into the atmosphere.
The exploration of fossil fuels leads to environmental and atmospheric pollution. The effects of
the pollution lead to pulmonary diseases and other complications. Intermittent sources are
renewable and safe. The renewable sources can be stored for future usage. Finally, sunrays for a
day provide sufficient energy that can sustain a country for the whole year.

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 10
References
Borenstein, S., & Bushnell, J. (2015). The US electricity industry after 20 years of restructuring.
Annu. Rev. Econ., 7(1), 437-463.
Boykoff, M. T., Daly, M., McAllister, L., McNatt, M., Nacu-Schmidt, A., Oonk, D., & Pearman,
O. (2018). United States Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming,
2000-2018-April 2018.
Covert, T., Greenstone, M., & Knittel, C. R. (2016). Will we ever stop using fossil fuels?.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 117-38.
Delman, E. M., Stephenson, S. R., Davis, S. J., & Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2015, December). A
Vulnerability-Benefit Analysis of Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. In AGU Fall Meeting
Abstracts.
Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status,
prospects, and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
39, 748-764.
Hertwich, E. G., Gibon, T., Bouman, E. A., Arvesen, A., Suh, S., Heath, G. A., ... & Shi, L.
(2015). Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms the
global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 112(20), 6277-6282.
Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Bazouin, G., Bauer, Z. A., Heavey, C. C., Fisher, E., ... &
Yeskoo, T. W. (2015). 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-
sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(7),
2093-2117.

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 11
Kaplan, Y. A. (2015). Overview of wind energy in the world and assessment of current wind
energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 562-568.
Krieger, E. M., Casey, J. A., & Shonkoff, S. B. (2016). A framework for siting and dispatch of
emerging energy resources to realize environmental and health benefits: the Case study
on peaker power plant displacement. Energy Policy, 96, 302-313.
McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when
limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature, 517(7533), 187.
Murakami, K., Ida, T., Tanaka, M., & Friedman, L. (2015). Consumers' willingness to pay for
renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan.
Energy Economics, 50, 178-189.
Noori, M., Kucukvar, M., & Tatari, O. (2015). A macro-level decision analysis of wind power as
a solution for sustainable energy in the USA. International Journal of Sustainable
Energy, 34(10), 629-644.
Sovacool, B. K., & Drupady, I. M. (2016). Energy access, poverty, and development: the
governance of small-scale renewable energy in developing Asia. Routledge.
Strachan, P. A., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry‐Brennan, F., & Toke, D. (2015). Promoting
community renewable energy in a corporate energy world. Sustainable development,
23(2), 96-109.
Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J. C. C. M., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring
the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 128, 142-155.

INTERMITTENT POWER SOURCES OVER FOSSIL FUELS 12
Vidal-Amaro, J. J., Østergaard, P. A., & Sheinbaum-Pardo, C. (2015). Optimal energy mix for
transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources–The case of the Mexican
electricity system. Applied Energy, 150, 80-96.