Christian Theology: Exploring Incarnation, Atonement, and Salvation
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/03
|8
|1996
|430
Essay
AI Summary
This essay delves into the interconnected concepts of incarnation and atonement within Christian theology, emphasizing the role of Jesus Christ and the significance of his crucifixion. It explores Anselm's satisfaction theory, which posits that Jesus Christ's suffering served as a substitution for human sins, highlighting the importance of faith and the necessity of Jesus's death for the justification of the world order. The essay further discusses the relationship between incarnation and atonement, arguing that Jesus's incarnation as the Son of God paved the way for the atonement of human sins. It concludes by emphasizing the continuous process of salvation and the importance of human beings atoning for their sins to achieve incarnation, highlighting Jesus Christ as the ideal figure for humanity.

Running head: CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
Christian Spiritual Version
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Christian Spiritual Version
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

1CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
Introduction
The terms ‘incarnation’ and ‘atonement’ are deeply interconnected with each other in the
concept of theology. One important aspect that is associated with this concept is that of
resurrection of Jesus Christ. Torrance has defined these two terms in a way that they can be
interpreted as very important factors for the understanding of the Christian theology. This
concept is mainly derived from the Greek patristic theology of Athanasius. Torrance had
discussed about the relationship between the atonement and incarnation in a number of ways
(Inge: 23). In this light the concept of atonement will also be highlighted by aligning with the
satisfaction theory of atonement by Anseim. The several aspects regarding this concept will be
highlighted in the paper. The role of the Jesus Christ will be evaluated in this paper as well. The
incident of the crucifixion of Jesus does have a very important role to play in this theological
perspective (Migliore: 347).
The theory of satisfaction
The theory of satisfaction by Anseim is one of the most important theories in theology.
According to this theory, Jesus Christ had to suffer the crucifixion as he became the substation
for the human sins (Sumner: 378). St. Anseim has preached his messages through the lines fides
quaerens intellectum that means the faith seeking understanding. The theological approaches of
the church and the approach of St. Anseim have been reflected in the theory of satisfaction. The
concept of faith has always been a mystery according to the Christian theology (Inge: 23). St.
ANseim has provided much insight into the matters of Christian theology and redesigned the
several factors indeed. Some of his works had been misunderstood because no one was able to
understand that.
Introduction
The terms ‘incarnation’ and ‘atonement’ are deeply interconnected with each other in the
concept of theology. One important aspect that is associated with this concept is that of
resurrection of Jesus Christ. Torrance has defined these two terms in a way that they can be
interpreted as very important factors for the understanding of the Christian theology. This
concept is mainly derived from the Greek patristic theology of Athanasius. Torrance had
discussed about the relationship between the atonement and incarnation in a number of ways
(Inge: 23). In this light the concept of atonement will also be highlighted by aligning with the
satisfaction theory of atonement by Anseim. The several aspects regarding this concept will be
highlighted in the paper. The role of the Jesus Christ will be evaluated in this paper as well. The
incident of the crucifixion of Jesus does have a very important role to play in this theological
perspective (Migliore: 347).
The theory of satisfaction
The theory of satisfaction by Anseim is one of the most important theories in theology.
According to this theory, Jesus Christ had to suffer the crucifixion as he became the substation
for the human sins (Sumner: 378). St. Anseim has preached his messages through the lines fides
quaerens intellectum that means the faith seeking understanding. The theological approaches of
the church and the approach of St. Anseim have been reflected in the theory of satisfaction. The
concept of faith has always been a mystery according to the Christian theology (Inge: 23). St.
ANseim has provided much insight into the matters of Christian theology and redesigned the
several factors indeed. Some of his works had been misunderstood because no one was able to
understand that.

2CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
St. Anseim had always focused on the relevance of the Cross. Anseim opined that the
death of Jesus Christ was indeed essential so the order of the world could be justified. He
believed that the human beings disrespected the God and this resulted in a number of unwanted
events for them (Sumner: 378). The repercussions of these events were mostly negative
(Migliore: 347). He also said that the biggest problem in doing this is the human beings would
never be able repay the deeds they have already done. God is infinite and it is the duty of the
human beings to respect God. As per the words of Anseim, it is beyond the power of the human
beings to offer the infinite satisfaction (McGrath: 265). It is because the human beings do not
have that much infinite power. Human beings are the rational creatures created by the infinite
God Himself. The human beings must be able to believe that the God has created everything in
this universe and human beings should owe everything to God only. God will always act on the
basis of love and mercy. This is why the human beings must always commit the deeds by which
God can show them the benevolence (Christie: 229).
God had sent his Son, the Jesus Christ to the earth so he could salvage the sins of the
human beings for the act of crucifixion. The God is obviously the infinite and only he possesses
the ability to pay the debt for the human beings (McGrath: 265). However, the perception of
atonement comes from the fact that the God must be same as the human beings from the
ontological perspective (Christie: 229). This is the reason God had sent Jesus Christ to the earth
for the atonements of the sins as a human being. Jesus Christ is completely free from the sins and
He is the perfect figure for the ultimate sins (McGrath: 346). His divine nature will free all the
human beings of their sins indeed. This theory of satisfaction is indeed very closely related with
the atonement of the human beings indeed. This is why the death of Jesus has been considered as
a very important aspect for understanding the matter of atonement (Sumner: 378). The early
St. Anseim had always focused on the relevance of the Cross. Anseim opined that the
death of Jesus Christ was indeed essential so the order of the world could be justified. He
believed that the human beings disrespected the God and this resulted in a number of unwanted
events for them (Sumner: 378). The repercussions of these events were mostly negative
(Migliore: 347). He also said that the biggest problem in doing this is the human beings would
never be able repay the deeds they have already done. God is infinite and it is the duty of the
human beings to respect God. As per the words of Anseim, it is beyond the power of the human
beings to offer the infinite satisfaction (McGrath: 265). It is because the human beings do not
have that much infinite power. Human beings are the rational creatures created by the infinite
God Himself. The human beings must be able to believe that the God has created everything in
this universe and human beings should owe everything to God only. God will always act on the
basis of love and mercy. This is why the human beings must always commit the deeds by which
God can show them the benevolence (Christie: 229).
God had sent his Son, the Jesus Christ to the earth so he could salvage the sins of the
human beings for the act of crucifixion. The God is obviously the infinite and only he possesses
the ability to pay the debt for the human beings (McGrath: 265). However, the perception of
atonement comes from the fact that the God must be same as the human beings from the
ontological perspective (Christie: 229). This is the reason God had sent Jesus Christ to the earth
for the atonements of the sins as a human being. Jesus Christ is completely free from the sins and
He is the perfect figure for the ultimate sins (McGrath: 346). His divine nature will free all the
human beings of their sins indeed. This theory of satisfaction is indeed very closely related with
the atonement of the human beings indeed. This is why the death of Jesus has been considered as
a very important aspect for understanding the matter of atonement (Sumner: 378). The early
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

3CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
theologians had claimed that the death of Christ was very much cruel through crucifixion and
this death had in turn benefitted the human beings (Torrance: 278).
The mankind is full of the sins and there was the utmost need for the human beings to
salvage therm. This is why there was no way out other than sending the Son of God, Jesus Christ
to the world (Torrance: 278). The suffering that Jesus Christ had endured was very much
necessary for the salvation of the human beings. In other words it can be said that the atonement
for the human beings also became necessary so that they themselves could take some steps in
order to salvage their sins (McGrath: 346). The ontological argument is very much important for
the proper understanding of the matter. Some people had even said that Jesus Christ had shed off
his human avatar after the ascension or the resurrection (Habets: 789). However, Torrance has
argued very frequently that Jesus Christ never shed off his humanity since He remains a human
being forever. It can also be put in another way as well. It must be mentioned that there is a
human being who is an integral part of the communion of the Holy Trinity (Placher and Derek:
135).
Relationship between incarnation and atonement
This is why the human beings could stay relieved as well. So, Jesus Christ can be deemed
as the eternal Son of God who became a human (Placher and Derek: 135). The birth of Jesus in
the womb of Virgin Mary could be deemed as an event that could be taken as very crucial for the
progress towards the Holy Cross and the tomb. The Holy Spirit is also looking after the aspect of
human salvation by God acting and Man acting (Habets: 789). Thus it can be said that the
incarnation of the Jesus Christ has led to the atonement for the sins of the human beings
(Kärkkäinen: 239). The human personality of Jesus Christ is being carried out thus so
theologians had claimed that the death of Christ was very much cruel through crucifixion and
this death had in turn benefitted the human beings (Torrance: 278).
The mankind is full of the sins and there was the utmost need for the human beings to
salvage therm. This is why there was no way out other than sending the Son of God, Jesus Christ
to the world (Torrance: 278). The suffering that Jesus Christ had endured was very much
necessary for the salvation of the human beings. In other words it can be said that the atonement
for the human beings also became necessary so that they themselves could take some steps in
order to salvage their sins (McGrath: 346). The ontological argument is very much important for
the proper understanding of the matter. Some people had even said that Jesus Christ had shed off
his human avatar after the ascension or the resurrection (Habets: 789). However, Torrance has
argued very frequently that Jesus Christ never shed off his humanity since He remains a human
being forever. It can also be put in another way as well. It must be mentioned that there is a
human being who is an integral part of the communion of the Holy Trinity (Placher and Derek:
135).
Relationship between incarnation and atonement
This is why the human beings could stay relieved as well. So, Jesus Christ can be deemed
as the eternal Son of God who became a human (Placher and Derek: 135). The birth of Jesus in
the womb of Virgin Mary could be deemed as an event that could be taken as very crucial for the
progress towards the Holy Cross and the tomb. The Holy Spirit is also looking after the aspect of
human salvation by God acting and Man acting (Habets: 789). Thus it can be said that the
incarnation of the Jesus Christ has led to the atonement for the sins of the human beings
(Kärkkäinen: 239). The human personality of Jesus Christ is being carried out thus so
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

4CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
wonderfully since it would be impossible to separate the communion of God and man in the
same body. This will make the work of salvation easier indeed (Kärkkäinen: 239).
Jesus Christ thus is the God-Man who continues His work of purifying the sins of the
human beings has to go on slowly and this is a continuous process. Once the human beings are
salvaged of their sins and their body gets as pure as Jesus Himself, they will be incarnated just as
Christ has been. Many times the human beings are not at all ashamed for their deeds and they go
on to committing such deeds (Walker: 367). Thus they get into the world of the sins all the more.
This practice should not be there at all. Now, the image of Jesus Christ as the God-Man could be
assumed. In the Bible it also has been declared that the ‘Jesus died for all and therefore all died’.
Jesus Christ is the creator of the world and the human beings and therefore He has the power to
sustain this world (Layman: 498).
It is believed by the Church that the confessions will salvage the sins of the human beings
and lead them to the way of incarnation. He is the representative of the divinity of God.
Therefore, He has all the powers to be the substitute and sacrifice His life for the well-being of
the human beings (Walker: 367). The interpretation of the redemption can be taken as a very
important aspect to save the human beings from the curse of damnation. Jesus Christ has the
same relation to the God as that of the saved human beings (Layman: 498). The salvation of the
human beings is a continuous and creative process where Jesus Christ is at the focal point
(Torrance: 278). However, the redemption from the sins can be achieved if the human beings are
lovingly obedient to the God Himself. Jesus Christ is perceived as the right and perfect person
and He should be the ideal one for all the human beings indeed (Sumner: 378). The relationship
between the God and the humanity of the Jesus Christ is definitely unique. The identity of Jesus
wonderfully since it would be impossible to separate the communion of God and man in the
same body. This will make the work of salvation easier indeed (Kärkkäinen: 239).
Jesus Christ thus is the God-Man who continues His work of purifying the sins of the
human beings has to go on slowly and this is a continuous process. Once the human beings are
salvaged of their sins and their body gets as pure as Jesus Himself, they will be incarnated just as
Christ has been. Many times the human beings are not at all ashamed for their deeds and they go
on to committing such deeds (Walker: 367). Thus they get into the world of the sins all the more.
This practice should not be there at all. Now, the image of Jesus Christ as the God-Man could be
assumed. In the Bible it also has been declared that the ‘Jesus died for all and therefore all died’.
Jesus Christ is the creator of the world and the human beings and therefore He has the power to
sustain this world (Layman: 498).
It is believed by the Church that the confessions will salvage the sins of the human beings
and lead them to the way of incarnation. He is the representative of the divinity of God.
Therefore, He has all the powers to be the substitute and sacrifice His life for the well-being of
the human beings (Walker: 367). The interpretation of the redemption can be taken as a very
important aspect to save the human beings from the curse of damnation. Jesus Christ has the
same relation to the God as that of the saved human beings (Layman: 498). The salvation of the
human beings is a continuous and creative process where Jesus Christ is at the focal point
(Torrance: 278). However, the redemption from the sins can be achieved if the human beings are
lovingly obedient to the God Himself. Jesus Christ is perceived as the right and perfect person
and He should be the ideal one for all the human beings indeed (Sumner: 378). The relationship
between the God and the humanity of the Jesus Christ is definitely unique. The identity of Jesus

5CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
Christ related to God cannot be repeated and this will lead to the atonement of the human beings
(Walker: 367).
Conclusion
As per the above discussion the paper can be concluded that the aspects of atonement and
incarnation do have very deep interconnection. This leads the human beings to assume that the
human beings must salvage their sins in order to be incarnated. If they do not atone for their sins
their sins will not be salvaged. The God sent the Jesus Christ to the earth to salvage all the sins of
the human beings by the death by crucifixion. The theory of satisfaction by Anseim has been
discussed in this context as well. The sacrifice of the life of Jesus Christ for the salvation of the
sins of the human beings could be taken as one of the most significant events to understand the
theology.
Christ related to God cannot be repeated and this will lead to the atonement of the human beings
(Walker: 367).
Conclusion
As per the above discussion the paper can be concluded that the aspects of atonement and
incarnation do have very deep interconnection. This leads the human beings to assume that the
human beings must salvage their sins in order to be incarnated. If they do not atone for their sins
their sins will not be salvaged. The God sent the Jesus Christ to the earth to salvage all the sins of
the human beings by the death by crucifixion. The theory of satisfaction by Anseim has been
discussed in this context as well. The sacrifice of the life of Jesus Christ for the salvation of the
sins of the human beings could be taken as one of the most significant events to understand the
theology.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

6CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
References
Christie, Ann. Ordinary Christology: Who do you say I am? Answers from the pews. Routledge,
2016.
Habets, Myk. Theosis in the theology of Thomas Torrance. Routledge, 2016.
Inge, John. A Christian theology of place. Routledge, 2017.
Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti. Trinity and Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine of the Trinity in Christian
Theology of Religions. Routledge, 2017.
Layman, Charles Stephen. Philosophical approaches to atonement, incarnation, and the trinity.
Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
McGrath, Alister E. Christian theology: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
McGrath, Alister E. The Christian theology reader. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Migliore, Daniel L. Faith seeking understanding: An introduction to Christian theology. Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing, 2014.
Placher, William C., and Derek R. Nelson. A History of Christian Theology: An Introduction.
Westminster John Knox Press, 2013.
Sumner, George. "Why Anselm Still Matters." Anglican Theological Review 95.1 (2013): 25-35.
Torrance, Thomas F. Incarnation: The person and life of Christ. InterVarsity Press, 2015.
References
Christie, Ann. Ordinary Christology: Who do you say I am? Answers from the pews. Routledge,
2016.
Habets, Myk. Theosis in the theology of Thomas Torrance. Routledge, 2016.
Inge, John. A Christian theology of place. Routledge, 2017.
Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti. Trinity and Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine of the Trinity in Christian
Theology of Religions. Routledge, 2017.
Layman, Charles Stephen. Philosophical approaches to atonement, incarnation, and the trinity.
Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
McGrath, Alister E. Christian theology: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
McGrath, Alister E. The Christian theology reader. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Migliore, Daniel L. Faith seeking understanding: An introduction to Christian theology. Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing, 2014.
Placher, William C., and Derek R. Nelson. A History of Christian Theology: An Introduction.
Westminster John Knox Press, 2013.
Sumner, George. "Why Anselm Still Matters." Anglican Theological Review 95.1 (2013): 25-35.
Torrance, Thomas F. Incarnation: The person and life of Christ. InterVarsity Press, 2015.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

7CHRISTIAN SPIRITUAL VERSION
Walker, Robert T. "Incarnation and Atonement: Their Relation and Inter‐Relation in the
Theology of TF Torrance." Participatio: The Journal of the Thomas F. Torrance
Theological Fellowship3 (2012): 1-63.
Walker, Robert T. "Incarnation and Atonement: Their Relation and Inter‐Relation in the
Theology of TF Torrance." Participatio: The Journal of the Thomas F. Torrance
Theological Fellowship3 (2012): 1-63.
1 out of 8

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2025 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.