Comprehensive Incident Response Plan for the Coca-Cola Company

This report examines the incident response plan (IRP) for the Coca-Cola Company, highlighting the importance of a robust IRP to mitigate risks and ensure business continuity. The report begins with an introduction to the Coca-Cola Company and the necessity of an IRP in the modern global market. It then delves into the development of an effective IRP, emphasizing the creation of manuals and the assignment of responsibilities. The report identifies several critical incidents that could impact the company, including crisis management failures, inadequate risk identification, and price fluctuations, and explains how the IRP should address these issues. The report also outlines the process of executing the IRP, detailing best practices, and the key components of an effective plan, such as detection, investigation, and containment procedures. Finally, the report concludes by reiterating the importance of proactive planning and preparedness in protecting the company from potential threats and ensuring its long-term success. The report emphasizes the need for continuous improvement and learning from past incidents to enhance future response efforts.

Running Head: INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 1
Incident Response Plan (IRP) for the Coca-Cola Company
Name:
Institution Affiliation:

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 2
Introduction
Coca-Cola Company commonly referred to as Coke Corporation, is one of the American
multinational organizations. It deals with manufacturing, distribution, retailing, together with
marketing of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates alongside syrup. The company has an incident
response plan (IRP) that helps it in remaining competitive in the global market that deals with
soft drinks (Foster, 2014). The program of incident response within the Coke Company can
comprise of a set of written instructions that are vital in responding, detecting, as well as limiting
the influences of the data security event. The company can have an incident response plan that is
documented, a typed plan that includes different instinct phases that assist IT professionals and
workers in recognizing and dealing with cyber security such as the breaching of data or cyber-
attack on operations of the organization (DeVoe & Rahman, 2013). The company can develop an
appropriate incident response plan through regular training and updates on what workers and
management need to do to achieve the set mission along with the objectives of Coke Company.
Therefore, the primary aim of this research paper is to develop the incident response plan for the
Coke Company by limiting the program to different incidents that can critically affect its
operations.
Development of Incident response plan for Coke Company
The creation of an effective incident response plan of Coke Company has to be the
company’s first line of defense against any form of threats and attacks in its operations. The
company can ensure that they have effective IRP by creating different manuals that tend to give
appropriate descriptions of how the company’s management can detect as well as limit the
impact of security incidents during the process of manufacturing, distribution, and marketing
coke products (Mazitelli, 2014). The company can ensure the formation of ideal IRP by listing

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 3
down different actors within its operations. Such listings can aid the management and workers of
Coke’s company to have particular responsibilities and offer series of directives that are vital in
determination of the scope of the response options, dangers, and protocols of communication
(Ryan, 2015). Furthermore, effective IRP can be used by Coke Company to reduce the
probability of the common security incident happening in its future operations.
Incidents that could critically impact the organization during development of IRP
Some of the essential incidents that must be taken into consideration by the management
and workers of Coke Company are diverse. Critical incidents that could critically impact
development of IRP remain to be any situation in which the organization experiences the danger
to their physical safety, their wellbeing, or injury as the result of traumatic event like crime or
accidents. These incidents include ineffectiveness in preparation of crisis management, lack of
proper identification of dangers in global market, lack of containment among managers,
eradication of prices of beverages, lack of recovery from revenue losses, along with different
inappropriate follow up on lesson learned in operations (Mokhov & Ryabukhin, 2018). For
instance, development is a critical phase in developing IRP for the company as it entails the idea
of preparing management, workers, and staff dealing with IT to handle prospect occurrences that
might happen during operation of the organization. However, incident of ineffectiveness in
preparation of crisis management can lead to cases of unauthorized access to the company’s
website by their competitors such as Pepsi Company making it tough to create IRP. The other
incident that critically affects organization is lack of proper identification of dangers in global
market. Hence, management dealing with developing IRP for Coke Company has to focus on
improved identification that helps determine whether the operations or the event is indeed the
security incident (Crowhurst & Patrick, 2018). The incident of lack of containment among

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 4
managers can be critical aspect in creating IRP as it consists of the idea of limiting the harm of
the occurrence that influenced system. Such limitations are significance in preventing further
damage that can occur in the process of marketing and distribution of the company’s products.
The other significance incident within IRP that can critically influence the operations of
Coke Company is eradication of prices of beverages. The eradication might affect process of
attaining the major cause of an event by eliminating impacted systems from the manufacturing
sector of Coke Company. Additionally, IRP can be affected by incident of lack of recovery from
revenue losses within the operations of the company (Wang, 2015). For instance, the
development of effective IRP can be essential in recovery that can permit every affected system
to be back into the production sector. Therefore, the ideal IRP can help in ensuring that there is
no single threat that remains to affect the operations of the Coke Company. Moreover, effective
IRP can be developed by using different lessons learned in the process of operation,
manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of Coke’s products. The use of lessons learned by
various stakeholders of the company can aid in the process of completing incident
documentation. The use of such experiences can be useful in performing the necessary
examinations to eventually learn from the occurrence and potentially enhance prospect reaction
efforts (Liu et al., 2012). Hence, taking the opportunity by company’s management to develop
vigorous IRP can seem less essential than applying the limited resources within the company to
more immediate requirements. However, the consequences of being unready and unprepared
when the incident happens far outdo or outweigh the effort, time, together with investment in
creating the firm incident response plan for the Coke Company.
Incident response planning

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 5
Figure 1 - Process of executing the IRP in the Coke Company
The best practice of ensuring the active development of an ideal IRP within the Coca-
Cola Company must follow the standard structure. The structure must comprise an overview of
the practical plan, a list of different responsibilities and roles, together with a list of various
incidents that need urgent actions (Crowhurst & Patrick, 2018). Other typical structures that must
be followed when forming effective IRP for the Coke Company consist of detection,
investigation, and containment procedures, list of follow-up operations, call list, steps towards
eradication and recovery, alongside the present state of the network infrastructure and security
safeguards. Hence, effective IRP for the company can assist the organization by directing how to
reduce period as well as damage from different incidents of security (Ryan, 2015). It also helps
in recognizing contributing stakeholders, hastening recovery duration, reforming forensic
examination, decreasing unconstructive promotion, and finally enhancing the assurance of
management and shareholders of the Coca-Cola Company.
Conclusion

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 6
It is clear from the above examination that the focus on developing effective IRP for the
Coke Company has to can be used to reduce the probability of the common security incident
happening in its future operations. The set up has to identify different devices of technologies
and physical possessions that must be present to restore violated data. The development of IRP
for Coke Company can be tailored to a particular business risk of the company and its needs that
have been identified. However, creation of an effective incident response plan of Coke Company
is the organization’s initial line of defense against any form of threats and attacks in its
operations.

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 7
References
Crowhurst, M., & Patrick, R. (2018). Critical incident sparks critical incident sparks critical
incident: an ‘aresolutionist’ method. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 389-398. doi:
10.1080/14623943.2018.1479689
DeVoe, C., & M. Rahman, S. (2013). Incident Response Plan for a Small to Medium Sized
Hospital. International Journal Of Network Security & Its Applications, 5(2), 1-20. doi:
10.5121/ijnsa.2013.5201
Foster, R. (2014). Corporations as Partners: “Connected Capitalism” and The Coca-Cola
Company. Polar: Political And Legal Anthropology Review, 37(2), 246-258. doi:
10.1111/plar.12073
Liu, P., Xu, B., Hu, F., Yu, H., & Li, J. (2012). A New Complex Incident Response Plan
Decision-Making Model. Applied Mechanics And Materials, 241-244, 1133-1138. doi:
10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.241-244.1133
Mazitelli, N. (2014). Incident Response and Handling. Engineering & Technology Reference.
doi: 10.1049/etr.2014.0034
Mokhov, V., & Ryabukhin, M. (2018). Sustainable development program «COCA-COLA HBC
RUSSIA». Investment And Innovation Management Journal, (4), 68-72. doi:
10.14529/iimj170410

INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN (IRP) FOR THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 8
Ryan, J. (2015). Review of:Computer Incident Response and Forensics Team Management:
Conducting a Successful Incident Response. Journal Of Forensic Sciences, 60(1), 265-
265. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12646
Wang, M. (2015). Brief Analysis of Sports Marketing Strategy Adopted by Coca Cola Company.
Asian Social Science, 11(23). doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n23p22