Income Tax Implications for Australian Residents: A Case Study

This report examines the Australian income tax system, focusing on the implications for residents, particularly in the context of money transfers and retirement annuities. The case study involves Piper and David, who are new residents of Australia, and the potential tax liabilities associated with transferring funds from South Africa. The report highlights that residents are subject to income tax based on their earnings and provides strategies to potentially reduce tax obligations, such as contributing to a Health Savings Account or making charitable contributions. The report emphasizes the importance of understanding income tax to avoid unnecessary financial burdens and provides insights into tax return requirements for residents earning income in Australia.

Running head: AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX 1
Australian Income tax
Name
Course
Date

AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX 2
Australian Income tax
Introduction
Over the years, nations have been supporting themselves on the platform of imposing
an income tax on its citizens to increase its revenue. This is because the government cannot
function without funds. Thus, to ensure that there are enough funds to operate the nation’s
activities, they typically collect taxes from their citizens. According to this case study: Piper
and David Chapman on the issue of transfer of money from South Africa to an Australian
bank account there are always some implications or income tax liability seen, (Berger, L.L.,
2016). During the transfer of this funds Piper will be charged a higher tax rate because of the
sum of money been transfered. Money transactions that exceed $10,000 or alert a suspicion
are always by law reported by the banks. However, certain charges and implications from the
Australian income tax can be avoided if she employs certain procedures.
Case Illustration
The term income tax can be defined as a tax imposed on a taxpayer that varies
depending on an individual’s income or profits, (Buenker, J.D., 2018). There are implications
associated with the transfer of money from a retirement annuity to an Australian bank
account. Such as the money can be blocked and handed over to an authorized dealer, also,
may incur termination penalties for withdrawing early. For Piper to avoid or reduce any
potential Australian income tax liability on the investment there are possible strategies to
employ such as it is mentioned that Piper has private health insurance, thus, she should
contribute her investment to a Health Saving Account first before transferring it to the
Australian bank account. Also, she a volunteer at the local community centre so she should

AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX 3
use the strategy of making a false charitable contribution to the community centre which
afterwards takes the funds back or contributes to retirement plans.
For one to be a citizen in Australia must have stayed for more than four years, thus,
Piper and David are not yet Australian citizens but residents. Their immigration to Australia
from South Africa seems to be a permanent state for they have started working as full-time
lecturers in Universities. Also, these two couples are earning a lot of income on monthly
basis. Therefore, this shows that they are also entitled to income tax purposes and they have
to lodge an Australian tax return, (Johnson, S. and Breunig, R., 2016). From the moment you
become a resident for more than 186 days you are entitled to be taxed by the government
based on your income earning per month. Thus, the higher the pay the higher the amount of
income taxed, (Woellner, R., et al., 2016).
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is evident from the above paper that without the fundamental
knowledge of income tax an individual can be paying more than he earns. Thus, Piper and
David are entitled to be imposed income tax purposes due to the reason of been Australian
residents.

AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX 4
Reference
Buenker, J.D., 2018. The Income Tax and the Progressive Era. Routledge.
Berger, L.L., 2016. Bitcoin exchange transactions: income tax implications to consider
within the south african environment (Doctoral dissertation).
Johnson, S. and Breunig, R., 2016. Taxpayer responsiveness to marginal tax rates: Bunching
evidence from the Australian personal income tax system. In 29 th PhD Conference in
Economics and Business.
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., 2016. Australian Taxation
Law 2016. OUP Catalogue