Selling vs Transferring Shares: Analysis for AP Spencer's Estate
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/12
|6
|1445
|428
Report
AI Summary
This report advises George Spencer, the sole executor and beneficiary of the AP Spencer Dec’d estate, on whether to sell inherited shares directly or transfer them to himself before selling. It highlights the tax implications, particularly capital gains tax (CGT), associated with both options. The report explains that shares purchased after September 20, 1985, are subject to CGT, and transferring shares before selling could lead to double taxation. It also notes the potential for inheriting the deceased's cost base. The analysis suggests that directly selling the shares would likely be more cost-effective and less burdensome in terms of paperwork, considering brokerage fees and other transaction costs. The recommendation is to sell the shares directly to minimize tax liabilities and streamline the process.

Running head: INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 1
Independent Research Project
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Independent Research Project
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 2
Independent Research Project
Ref: Selling or Transferring Inherited Shares
Dear George,
The untimely death of your father means that you are the sole executor and beneficiary of
AP Spencer Dec’d, an estate that he had developed. In his lifetime, Alexander P Spencer spent a
considerable part of his active life diversifying his investment portfolios in the Commonwealth
Bank and the National Australian Bank (Lam, & Humphreys, 2017). For the period ranging from
12th September 1991 to 14th November 1997, he made a substantial investment in terms of share
purchase at the Commonwealth Bank amounting to $29,635. As a shrewd investor, Alexander P
Spencer also diversified his investment risks by purchasing shares worth $2,420 at the National
Australia Bank. As the sole executor and beneficiary of AP Spencer Dec’d, you have been
earning off $200,000 a year in terms of the interest rate and the bonuses accruing from the
inherited shares (Woellner, Barkoczy, Murphy, Evans & Pinto, 2012). However, your decision to
sell shares either directly or by first transferring them to your name before selling them needs
sober considerations in terms of the prospective incurred costs.
As the sole executor of AP Spencer Dec’d, you will have to keenly consider the taxation
aspect applicable to the inherited shares and whether you intend to hold the inherited shares
under your portfolio for a long time before selling them. In this case, it is imperative to note that
the inherited estate shares from Alexander P Spencer are subjected to a cost base in terms of the
price that is expected to be paid by the original owner of the shares (Cockburn, 2017). Legally,
the existing legal frameworks in Australia requires that shares purchased before 20th September
1985 can be sold or transferred without attracting the capital gain tax (CGT) (Norbury, 2017).
Independent Research Project
Ref: Selling or Transferring Inherited Shares
Dear George,
The untimely death of your father means that you are the sole executor and beneficiary of
AP Spencer Dec’d, an estate that he had developed. In his lifetime, Alexander P Spencer spent a
considerable part of his active life diversifying his investment portfolios in the Commonwealth
Bank and the National Australian Bank (Lam, & Humphreys, 2017). For the period ranging from
12th September 1991 to 14th November 1997, he made a substantial investment in terms of share
purchase at the Commonwealth Bank amounting to $29,635. As a shrewd investor, Alexander P
Spencer also diversified his investment risks by purchasing shares worth $2,420 at the National
Australia Bank. As the sole executor and beneficiary of AP Spencer Dec’d, you have been
earning off $200,000 a year in terms of the interest rate and the bonuses accruing from the
inherited shares (Woellner, Barkoczy, Murphy, Evans & Pinto, 2012). However, your decision to
sell shares either directly or by first transferring them to your name before selling them needs
sober considerations in terms of the prospective incurred costs.
As the sole executor of AP Spencer Dec’d, you will have to keenly consider the taxation
aspect applicable to the inherited shares and whether you intend to hold the inherited shares
under your portfolio for a long time before selling them. In this case, it is imperative to note that
the inherited estate shares from Alexander P Spencer are subjected to a cost base in terms of the
price that is expected to be paid by the original owner of the shares (Cockburn, 2017). Legally,
the existing legal frameworks in Australia requires that shares purchased before 20th September
1985 can be sold or transferred without attracting the capital gain tax (CGT) (Norbury, 2017).

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 3
However, for the shares purchased or acquired after 20th September 1985, they will be subjected
to capital gain tax (CGT) for all the undertaken transactions.
Considering that a significant portion of the shares you have inherited from your father
were purchased after the 20th September 1985, then all the transaction you will undertake will be
subjected to a capital gain tax. In this case, if you choose to transfer the inherited estate shares to
your portfolio before selling them, then the cost base for the inherited shares will be computed in
terms of the market value of the respective amount of shares at the date of death of your father
(Weisbord, Horton, & Urice, 2018). This implies that you will be subjected to a double taxation
burden in terms of the capital gain tax. Furthermore, it is essential to note that you will be liable
for paying the cost base for the inherited shares in terms of CGT given that a huge chunk of
them were purchased after the operationalization of the capital gain tax act post 20th September
1985 (Sawyer & Sadiq, 2017). This implies that as the sole executor of the inherited estate
shares, the burden of meeting the incurred CGT will be transferred to you in the absence of the
deceased original owner.
Furthermore, before transferring the shares to your name, your capital gains or losses in
the estate’s income tax returns will be assessed to determine the legitimate amount of tax you are
supposed to pay (Blakelock & King, 2017). Considering that the cost base of the inherited
shares, in this case, will be the same as the deceased, then logic implies that you will end up also
inheriting the deceased cost base. In essence, this implies that you will pay the cost that would
have been incurred by Alexander P Spencer upon providing the needed valid documentation
such as the deceased death certificate. Despite incurring such amount of taxes in terms of CGT
when transferring the inherited shares to your name, it is essential also to note that you will be
subjected to similar conditions and requirements when selling them. Therefore, at the point of
However, for the shares purchased or acquired after 20th September 1985, they will be subjected
to capital gain tax (CGT) for all the undertaken transactions.
Considering that a significant portion of the shares you have inherited from your father
were purchased after the 20th September 1985, then all the transaction you will undertake will be
subjected to a capital gain tax. In this case, if you choose to transfer the inherited estate shares to
your portfolio before selling them, then the cost base for the inherited shares will be computed in
terms of the market value of the respective amount of shares at the date of death of your father
(Weisbord, Horton, & Urice, 2018). This implies that you will be subjected to a double taxation
burden in terms of the capital gain tax. Furthermore, it is essential to note that you will be liable
for paying the cost base for the inherited shares in terms of CGT given that a huge chunk of
them were purchased after the operationalization of the capital gain tax act post 20th September
1985 (Sawyer & Sadiq, 2017). This implies that as the sole executor of the inherited estate
shares, the burden of meeting the incurred CGT will be transferred to you in the absence of the
deceased original owner.
Furthermore, before transferring the shares to your name, your capital gains or losses in
the estate’s income tax returns will be assessed to determine the legitimate amount of tax you are
supposed to pay (Blakelock & King, 2017). Considering that the cost base of the inherited
shares, in this case, will be the same as the deceased, then logic implies that you will end up also
inheriting the deceased cost base. In essence, this implies that you will pay the cost that would
have been incurred by Alexander P Spencer upon providing the needed valid documentation
such as the deceased death certificate. Despite incurring such amount of taxes in terms of CGT
when transferring the inherited shares to your name, it is essential also to note that you will be
subjected to similar conditions and requirements when selling them. Therefore, at the point of
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 4
you finally selling the inherited shares, you would have incurred high tax costs that can be
avoided if you chose the shortest transaction route of selling the inherited estate shares directly.
On the other hand, you will only be subjected to a single tax burden in term of the capital
gain tax when you directly sell the shares. Comparably, this will be a significant relief in terms
of the incurred costs and the involved paperwork. For instance, it should be pointed out that you
should brace yourself for long and tedious paperwork and processes if you choose to first
transfer the inherited shares to your name before proceeding to sell them (Blackburn & Bulsara,
2018). However, you can be able to eliminate such unnecessary and unwarranted inconveniences
by selling directly the shares that you have inherited from your father. Therefore, adopting the
decision to sell the shares directly will significantly save you in terms of incurred costs and the
consumed amount of time. Considering that other than the capital gain tax there are other costs
associated to the whole process of transferring and selling the shares, it will be prudent for a less-
costly alternative to be undertaken given that other costs such as normal brokerage fees,
premiums and share sale services will be applicable to each of the undertaken transaction.
Therefore, basing on the total cost burden incurred at the end of each transaction, it is advisable
that you should consider directly selling the inherited shares other than first transferring them to
your name before selling them.
you finally selling the inherited shares, you would have incurred high tax costs that can be
avoided if you chose the shortest transaction route of selling the inherited estate shares directly.
On the other hand, you will only be subjected to a single tax burden in term of the capital
gain tax when you directly sell the shares. Comparably, this will be a significant relief in terms
of the incurred costs and the involved paperwork. For instance, it should be pointed out that you
should brace yourself for long and tedious paperwork and processes if you choose to first
transfer the inherited shares to your name before proceeding to sell them (Blackburn & Bulsara,
2018). However, you can be able to eliminate such unnecessary and unwarranted inconveniences
by selling directly the shares that you have inherited from your father. Therefore, adopting the
decision to sell the shares directly will significantly save you in terms of incurred costs and the
consumed amount of time. Considering that other than the capital gain tax there are other costs
associated to the whole process of transferring and selling the shares, it will be prudent for a less-
costly alternative to be undertaken given that other costs such as normal brokerage fees,
premiums and share sale services will be applicable to each of the undertaken transaction.
Therefore, basing on the total cost burden incurred at the end of each transaction, it is advisable
that you should consider directly selling the inherited shares other than first transferring them to
your name before selling them.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 5
In this case, the decision to directly sell the shares will save you from the cost base of
shares in terms of the accrued capital gain tax that would have been paid by you having inherited
the shares from your deceased father (Beyer, 2017). Furthermore, you should also prioritize
selling the shares in the estate to save yourself from the tedious paperwork and documentation
that you will have to meet in the process of transferring the inherited shares to your name before
selling them. It is on this basis that it is highly recommended for you to sell the shares in the
estate.
In this case, the decision to directly sell the shares will save you from the cost base of
shares in terms of the accrued capital gain tax that would have been paid by you having inherited
the shares from your deceased father (Beyer, 2017). Furthermore, you should also prioritize
selling the shares in the estate to save yourself from the tedious paperwork and documentation
that you will have to meet in the process of transferring the inherited shares to your name before
selling them. It is on this basis that it is highly recommended for you to sell the shares in the
estate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECT 6
References
Beyer, G. (2017). Intestate Succession: What Every Texas Estate Planner Needs to Know.
Blackburn, P., & Bulsara, C. (2018). “I am tired of having to prove that my husband was dead.”
Dealing with practical matters in bereavement and the impact on the bereaved. Death
studies, 1-9.
Blakelock, S., & King, P. (2017). Taxation law: The advance of ATO data matching. Proctor,
The, 37(6), 18.
Cockburn, T. (2017). Equity in estate litigation. Trusts & Trustees, 23(10), 1066-1088.
Lam, D., & Humphreys, J. (2017). Estates and tax: Costly mistakes in using deceased estates
exemptions from duty. LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal, (38), 84.
Norbury, M. (2017). Caratti and the deceased estate. Taxation in Australia, 52(3), 159.
Sawyer, A. J., & Sadiq, K. (2017). Reflections on New Zealand’s ‘Experience’with Capital
Gains Taxation.
Weisbord, R. K., Horton, D., & Urice, S. K. (2018). Wills, Trusts, and Estates: The Essentials.
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C., & Pinto, D. (2012). Australian taxation law.
CCH Australia.
References
Beyer, G. (2017). Intestate Succession: What Every Texas Estate Planner Needs to Know.
Blackburn, P., & Bulsara, C. (2018). “I am tired of having to prove that my husband was dead.”
Dealing with practical matters in bereavement and the impact on the bereaved. Death
studies, 1-9.
Blakelock, S., & King, P. (2017). Taxation law: The advance of ATO data matching. Proctor,
The, 37(6), 18.
Cockburn, T. (2017). Equity in estate litigation. Trusts & Trustees, 23(10), 1066-1088.
Lam, D., & Humphreys, J. (2017). Estates and tax: Costly mistakes in using deceased estates
exemptions from duty. LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal, (38), 84.
Norbury, M. (2017). Caratti and the deceased estate. Taxation in Australia, 52(3), 159.
Sawyer, A. J., & Sadiq, K. (2017). Reflections on New Zealand’s ‘Experience’with Capital
Gains Taxation.
Weisbord, R. K., Horton, D., & Urice, S. K. (2018). Wills, Trusts, and Estates: The Essentials.
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C., & Pinto, D. (2012). Australian taxation law.
CCH Australia.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 6
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.