U23000 - Internal Auditing Effectiveness Compared to External Auditing

This essay examines the effectiveness of internal auditing compared to external auditing, exploring the significance of auditing for business development and growth. It analyzes the differences between internal and external audit processes, addressing the research question of whether internal auditing is more effective than external auditing. The literature review covers various perspectives on auditing, internal control systems, and risk management. The essay highlights the role of internal auditing in enhancing organizational value, improving internal control, and aligning business executives' interests with shareholders. The research concludes that internal auditing is vital for a strong governance structure and minimizing material misstatements, with regular internal audits being crucial for a robust system of governance.

1
Title: Effectiveness of Internal Auditing in Comparison to External Auditing

2
Contents
Research Rationale..........................................................................................................................3
Research Objectives.........................................................................................................................3
Research Questions or Problems.....................................................................................................4
Literature Review............................................................................................................................4
Research Method.............................................................................................................................8
Conclusion & Recommendation....................................................................................................11
References......................................................................................................................................12

3
Research Rationale
The present research is undertaken to examine the importance of auditing within an
organization. The activity of auditing within an organization can be regarded as the process of
independently checking the financial records of an organization so as to assure that the financial
statements prepared are accurate. The overall process of auditing is carried out by an auditor who
holds the responsibility of developing and examining the financial records. An auditor provides
opinions about the accuracy and faithful presentation of financial information that forms the
basis for decision-making of its end-users. This research holds high importance for providing an
understanding of the process of auditing that is crucial for assessing the adequacy of the control
mechanism of a firm. There are mainly two types of audit carried by an organization, that is,
internal and external audit. This research is conducted to demonstrate the importance of internal
and external auditing within a firm by providing an insight into both types of auditing
(Abdolmohammadi, 2009).
The research will help in making a comparison between the internal and external auditing
to determine which more effective for promoting the growth and development of a firm. The
difference between the internal audit, that is, reviewing the internal operational processes of a
firm and the external audit, that is, conducted by a third party to check the financial report
accuracy will be illustrated adequately with the help of research process. The research topic
selected of examining the effectiveness of internal and external auditing is selected in the context
to illustrate the nature of their processes and their relative importance for a firm. This will help
the readers in identifying and comparing effectively between the processes of internal and
external auditing.
This will help the business companies to implement the internal or external auditing
procedures for attaining the organizational goals and objectives. The research issue is selected
for exploration as there is large importance of reviewing the internal as well as external control
mechanism of a firm with the help of auditing process. The increasing fraudulent activities
within the firms is causing the need for reviewing and examining its internal as well as external
control structure to protect the interest of general public. The business companies worldwide
largely places focuses on carrying out external auditing of their firms and ignores the relative

4
significance of internal auditing as well. The internal auditing is required by the management of
a firm to assure that it has adequately implemented the risk and governance mechanisms for
maximizing the operational efficiency (Alzeban, 2015).
Research Objectives
The present research will aim to attain the following objectives:
 To develop an understanding of the importance of auditing process for the development
and growth of the businesses
 To examine and analyze the difference between internal and external auditing process
 To gain an understanding into the effectiveness of the internal auditing over external
auditing
Research Questions or Problems
In the context of the above stated objectives, this research will mainly aim to achieve the
following research question “Does internal auditing is effective over the external auditing
processes carried out by businesses at a global level?” This research will also attain the answer
for the following sub-research questions in context of this main research question as follows:
 What is the significance of auditing process carried out by firms for achieving their stated
goals and objectives?
 How the process of internal auditing within a firm does is different from that of external
auditing?
Literature Review
Savcuk (2007) stated that the process of auditing can be regarded as independently
reviewing and examining the records and activities of an organization for assessing the
appropriateness of system controls. This is done to ensure that businesses are complying
effectively with the established policies and procedures that are essential for their sustained
growth and development. In this context, Karagiorgos (2009) also explained that the auditing
process is mainly undertaken by a firm for ensuring that all business processes are carried out in
a transparent and ethical manner. The business firms are required to continually review their

5
internal as well as external control and systems for developing their competitive strength by
gaining credibility and reliability in the mind of the investors. The increasing globalization and
complexity of businesses is causing the increase in the number of cases related to fraudulent
financial reporting. This has caused the development of role of auditing within businesses to
overcome the increases cases related to fraudulent activities within a firm due to weak internal or
external control structure (Karagiorgos, 2009).
According to Boţa-Avram & Palfi (2009), there are mainly two types of audit carried out
by a business firm, that are, external and internal auditing. External audit can be regarded as the
process of examining the financial records and books of a company from the perspective of the
shareholders to determine their accuracy and reliability. The function of an external audit is
carried out by an independent body known as auditor who possesses the responsibility of
determining the accuracy of the financial statements developed by a firm. Similarly, Candreva
(2006) also stated that the primary responsibility of an auditor is to express a neutral opinion as
per the generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditor can be regarded as an
independent contractor while major role is to the reports on the financial statements of an
organization. Rittenberg (2006) also stated that the businesses carry out the external auditing of
their financial reports on an annual basis for assuring that their financial statements prepared are
free from any type of materialistic error and represents a true and fair view of the actual financial
position to the investors. It is required that external auditing needs to be carried out as per the
international auditing standards for examination and evaluation of the financial statements of an
organization.
On the other hand, Savcuk (2007) has argued that internal audit is carried out for
reviewing the financial and operational activities of a firm on a continuous basis to assess the
effectiveness of its internal control systems and procedures. It refers to the unbiased and
systematic analysis of business activities to identifying the areas of improvement and thus
strengthening the internal control systems and processes within a firm. The different type of
activities that are performed within internal auditing can be stated as follows:
 Evaluation of the accounting and internal control system
 Examining the daily operational activities
 Evaluating the financial and non-financial information within an organization

6
 Identification of frauds and errors
As per the views of Bogonko (2016) the internal auditing is mainly carried out by a
business firm with the aim of enhancing the organizational value by ensuring that there is
presence of effective internal control and risk management system. The process of internal
auditing is carried out by the internal auditors who are mainly the management people of an
organization. The business largely develops a separate department for performing continuous
audit to increase the effectiveness of organizational systems and policies. Thus, it can be stated
that internal audit is an independent and consulting activity of an organization that is carried out
mainly to improve the internal control system for achieving the organizational aims and
objectives (Bogonko, 2016).
Van Staden & Steyn (2009) has also stated that the demand for external as well as
internal audit has been increased largely with the increasing complexity in the business
environment. The audit carried out by businesses helps in carrying out its independent
verification for reducing the chances of error and fraudulent activities. External auditing carried
out by an independent external auditor has been placed large importance by the business
corporations for enhancing the credibility of their financial reports in the mind of their
stakeholders. However, Roziani (2011) has also stated that with the increasing fraudulent cases
within the business firms related to their weak governance mad control structure has largely
placed importance on internal auditing activities as well. The occurrence of corporate accounting
scandals such as Enron, WorldCom and others have shaken the investors’ confidence and caused
many changes within the accounting regulations to tighten the internal control structure of the
firms.
Hammad & Imdadullah (2012) has also argued that the businesses are also realizing that
the fraudulent activities that occurred within their firms can result in causing significant long-
term damage to their reputation besides the financial losses. Internal auditing deals with
improving the internal control within the firms for restoring the public trusts and overcoming the
occurrence of fraudulent activities. The primary objective of the internal audit is to provide
suggestions to the management for carrying out their roles in an effectively by reviewing of its
overall internal control systems and processes. Abbott, Parker & Peters (2010) has stated that the
deficiencies present within the internal control systems such as governance or risk management

7
structure are highlighted adequately within the internal audit. The internal auditing can be
categorized as more effective over external auditing as the presence of a strong governance
structure within a firm will help in reducing the materials misstatement errors during the
financial reporting process.
Prawitt (2009) in this context also stated that businesses need to place importance on
carrying out internal auditors in a regular manner besides only focusing on carrying out external
audit of their financial records. The fact has been highlighted by the occurrence of corporate
accounting scandals such as Enron that have highlighted the importance of having a robust
system of governing within the firms. The major benefit as per Holt & Deborah (2008) that the
management of a firm realizes by carrying out internal audit is developing a sound base for
judgment, identifying the weaknesses in control and performance. Developing suggestions for
improvement and disseminating information about the business processes that is required by all
level of management for better decision-making. It helps in examining the compliance of firms
with the established policies, plans, procedures, laws and regulations to determine that business
operations are carried out in an ethical manner (Holt & Deborah, 2008).
According to Rezaee (2009) the growing importance of developing an effective internal
control environment within an organization is causing the need for business to carry out the
internal audit in a regular manner. The control environment can be analyzed on the basis of the
factors such as integrity and ethical values, board committee management philosophy and
organizational structure. Alzeban (2014) has stated that the risk assessment within internal audit
can be evaluated on the basis of the factors such as process-level objectives and risk
identification. The monitoring of the governance and risk structure during the internal audit helps
the businesses for evaluating the quality of the internal system and analyzes its internal
performance (Alzeban, 2014). The factors that help in assessment of the components of an
internal control system can be depicted as follows:

8
(Source: )
Zohra & Huq (2014) has stated that the effectiveness of the internal auditing can also be
explained by the use of stewardship theory. The stewardship theory has stated that business
directors and executives of a firm hold the responsibility of maximizing the interests of the
shareholders. As such, there is need of presence of an effective internal control system and
policies within a firm that helps in assuring that interests of the business executives are aligned
with that of the shareholders (Zohra & Huq, 2014). Similarly, Cohen & Sayag (2010) has also
stated that it will assure that business managers are carrying out their responsibility in an ethical
manner and take the decisions that leads in ultimately improving the value of the shareholder’s.
Thus, it can be said that internal auditing has emerged as a necessity within businesses to assure
that the overall organizational activities are carried out in an ethical and transparent manner. It
has become an integral part of modern business as it makes the businesses to comply with the
accounting standards as per the standard regulatory requirements (Cohen & Sayag, 2010).
Ahmad, Othman & Jusoff (2009) stated that the business activities carried out as per the
accounting standards reduce the chances of getting material misstatement errors during external
auditing. As such, the importance of internal auditing is increasing among the businesses as they
understand the significance of developing an adequate internal control structure to reduce the
chances of error occurrence. The internal audit is gaining importance within the firm’s in-spite of
less compliance requirements than external auditing. This is because it is essential for detection
of fraud, management of risk and improving the organizational performance (Ahmad et al.,
2009).

9
In the opinion of Mihret & Yismaw (2007), the significance of the internal audit is
increasing within the accounting environment to attain the objectives of external auditing. The
occurrence of the global financial crisis in the year 2008 and the regulatory and economic
pressures is causing the businesses to carry out wide risk assessment and increase the
effectiveness of their internal control structures. The internal auditing helps in developing a
holistic approach for risk management by adequately addressing all the business risks. The
significant business risks such as social, ethical, financial, operational and environmental can be
adequately identified through the use of internal audit that will significantly lead in improving
the external reporting structures of the firm (Mihret & Yismaw, 2007).
Ali, Gloeck, Ali, Ahmi & Sahdan (2007) also stated in this context that the businesses
have largely understood that internal auditing is essential for them to enhance the value of their
business activities subsides only reviewing the internal control systems and processes. This is
because it leads to identification of the competent personnel and internal strengths and weakness
of a firm. The increasing efficiency of the risk management structures help in promoting the
fairness of business activities and adding value to the business outcomes. As per Zamzulaila,
Zarina & Dalila, (2007), the development of having effective internal control systems will
ultimately lead in preventing the occurrence of any financial uncertainty. The prevention of
occurrence of any financial uncertain condition begins with improving the transparency and
integrity within the business systems. This can be achieved adequately with the use of internal
auditing by the business firms and therefore it is increasing in effectiveness as compared with the
external auditing.
The overall discussion helps in the literature review has highlighted the line of difference
that exist between internal and external auditing. The internal auditing is carried out by the
internal management people of a firm while external auditing is carried out by hiring an
independent contractor know as auditor. Also, there is difference between their objectives as
internal auditing aims to review the internal control systems while external auditing evaluates the
accuracy and reliability of the external financial reports developed by a business firm. The
growing importance of internal auditing within businesses as compared to external auditing can
be attributed to developing an integrated system of internal control that will ultimately lead in

10
reducing the error occurrence within the external financial reports developed (Azzali & Mazza,
2018).
Research Method
Research method aims to provide the structure using which the research can be conducted
in systematic way. It is highly important to give proper consideration and importance to research
methods as it helps in providing the smoother platform for carrying out the research. Research
method is complete guiding map necessary for organizing, arranging and conducting the research
process in right manner so that it can completed in specified manner and in estimated time frame.
After framing the research question or questions, it is essential to collect the desired data
and information related to research question. The data and information helps research to
understand the research topic further and it also paves the path of achieving the research
objectives. The role of research methods is to set the research tools that can be used to gather the
data and information in proper manner so that no ethical violations can be done. As research
methodology deals with various aspects of research, it has been divided in various sub parts such
as research approach, research design, research method, data collection process, sample selection
process, methods of data of analysis and lastly ethical considerations (Gliner & Morgan, 2012).
Research Approach
There are mainly two types of research approaches that can be applied in research and
these research approaches are inductive and deductive research approach. In order to select the
correct research approach there is need to have adequate understanding of research objectives.
Both these research approaches differs on ground of their movement and manner used for
gathering data and evidences. Inductive research approach is known as bottom up research
approach and it moves from specific to general theory i.e. it collect facts and evidences for
specific context and analyze them to provide general observations. On the other hand, deductive
research approach moves from general to specific and it is the reason why it is known as top
down approach. It means general evidences and information is gathered to draw the conclusion
regarding the specific topic and subject (Hendricks, 2011).

11
In this research study the focus is use the inductive research approach as helps to satisfy
the research objectives. As the purpose of the research study is to provide the general views on
effectiveness of internal auditing and compare it with the external auditing, so it is required to
gather data from some of large companies in Singapore and analyze them to provide arguments
in favor and against the framed research question. Inductive research approach will provide
proper platform to gather the specific data and information in relation to the research objectives.
Further it will help to analyze the gather data in required manner to make general comment on
research questions.
Research Design
Research design is the most important part in the whole research study as this research
tools provides the basis for defining the manner through data and information can be collected.
Research design provides the framework on which entire process of data collection and analysis
depends. It means research design is the way to get the reliable and valid research outcomes
(Gillham, 2010).
According to research question, it is important to use the exploratory research design as it
best research design for this research study. Exploratory research design aims to investigate the
facts and information in detailed manner so that proper understanding of concerned research
topic can be made. Explorative research provide a platform through which each single aspect of
research can be investigate thoroughly so to conduct the research in optimum manner. Research
topic selected is very vast and requires exploring multiple aspects in minimum time and it can be
done only when exploratory research design has been selected (Fowler, 2012).
Research method for data collection
The tools and techniques used to collect the information have been defined under
research method area of the research study. The proper selection of research method helps to
gather both qualitative and quantitative research data. The two main research methods that are
viable for this research study are primary and secondary methods. Both these research methods
differ on the grounds of manner of collection the data and information. Primary research method
of data collection aims to provide original nature of data collection as it collects data directly
from the source it generates. So it can be said that primary research method of data collection

12
provide first hand (exclusive) information as this data has not been used by anyone else. On the
other hand secondary research method provides data and information that has already been
collected by someone and has been analyzed to reach at some conclusion. It means data and
information provided in already completed researches are used in secondary research method to
extract the required information. Some of important secondary sources of finance are research
articles, journals, research reports, online articles, newspapers, published articles etc. The main
reason why the secondary sources of data is collected and analyzed is to support the primary
data.
Primary research method for data collection is very important for this research study and
it has been decided to use survey method through applying interview technique. So detailed
survey questions will be drafted and asked with internal auditors as well as external auditors of
large firms in Singapore. Survey questions will be defined and same for all the respondents so to
make sure that data analysis can be performed in systematic manner. Interview questions are
framed in such a manner that they would be helpful in extracting the information that is useful
for this research. All the questions will be open ended as it would help to gain maximum
information those respondents. The purpose of using the open ended questions in survey research
data collection method is because it gives respondents a freedom to express their views, opinions
and perspectives. The questions list is build in a manner that it can to achieve the maximum
information from the respondents. Some questions will be general and some will specific to
ensure that desirable information can be gathered to achieve the research objectives (Fink, 2015).
Secondary research method for data collection is used to perform the literature review in
order to support facts and information that has been gathered for primary research purpose. As
this research is on effectiveness of internal auditing and how it more important than the external
reporting, there is need to make sure that all relevant literatures should be gathered and analyzed
in literature review.
Sample selection is an important criterion to decide how respondents for the purpose of
primary research will be decided so that research can be performed in proper manner. It has been
decided to use random sampling for the purpose of primary data collection. Request for
interview will be sent to all the members of selected for the sample and those members are
selected that answer the request. Total 50 respondents will be selected from the list of

13
respondents and interview will be performed with them on chosen date and time (Denzin &
Lincoln, 2010).
Data analysis
In order to analysis the data, it can been decided to use thematic analysis method to
evaluate the data collected from the respondents as it is best method to analyze the data collected
through interview method.
Ethical Considerations
Every research study is confronted with some kinds of ethical issues affecting research
results and outcomes. Ethical issues arise in the research study irrespective of the size and scope
of the research study. In other words, size and scope of the research study do not create any
impact on the ethical issues. Ethical issues are bound to arise in every research study whether the
study has large scope and size or not. Proper and due consideration to the ethical issues play a
significant role in improving authenticity and reliability of research results. Privacy, breach of
confidentiality, biasness, undue advantage of the information, unauthorized passing of
information to third parties, etc are some of the ethical issues handled by the researcher in the
present research study (Crowther & Lancaster, 2008).
Conclusion & Recommendation
It can be stated from the overall discussion held within the research that the process of
auditing within an organization is essential for independent verification of its internal and
external control systems and processes. The process of auditing deals with the independently
verifying the business systems to identify the loopholes that need to be overcame for reducing
the chance of any error occurrence. There are mainly two types of audit that are carried within an
organization, that are, internal and external auditing. The process of internal auditing is gaining
more importance within business firms as compared with the external auditing. This is because
internal auditing leads to improvement within the governing and risk management structure that
help in enhancing the value of business activities. The development of an effective internal
control structure developed on the principles of ethics and integrity will ultimately lead to
reduction in the errors within the financial reports. Thus, the quality of external auditing

14
eventually depends on the effectiveness of internal control structures present within a firm. The
efficiency of the internal control mechanism depends on the quality of internal audit carried out
by the business firms. The critical review of literature has also highlighted the difference that is
present between the internal and external auditing process of a firm. Therefore, it can be stated
from the literature reviewed has adequately addressed the research objectives and has lead in
exploring the research issue in detail.
It is recommend to the future researchers in this context to examine the research issue by
collection of specific data from the companies that are effectively carrying out both internal as
well as external auditing, The present research has mainly explored the qualitative data in
relation to the research issue and therefore lacks a practical base for exploring the research
topics. As such, future researchers are recommended to identify, collect, analyze and interpret
the specific data in relation to the research for enhancing the credibility and reliability of the
research outcomes.

15
References
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S. & Peters, G. F. (2010). Serving two masters: The association between
audit committee internal audit oversight and internal audit activities. Accounting
Horizons. 24(1), pp. 1-24.
Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (2009). Factors Associated with the Use of and Compliance with the
IIA Standards. A Study of Anglo-culture CAEs. International Journal of Auditing,
13(1), pp. 27-42.
Ahmad, H.N., Othman, R., Othman, R. & Jusoff, K. (2009). The Effectiveness of Internal Audit
in Malaysian Public Sector. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 5(9), pp. 53-62.
Ali, A. M., Gloeck, J. D., Ali, A., Ahmi, A., & Sahdan, M. H. (2007). Internal audit in the state
and local governments of Malaysia. Southern African Journal of Accountability and
Auditing Research, 7, pp. 25-57.
Alzeban, A. (2015). Influence of audit committees on internal audit conformance with
internal audit standards. Managerial Auditing Journal, 307(6), pp. 539-559.
Alzeban, A. 2014. The impact of culture on the quality of internal audit: An empirical study.
Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance30 (1), pp 57-70.
Azzali, S. & Mazza, T. (2018). The Internal Audit Effectiveness Evaluated with an
Organizational, Process and Relationship Perspective. International Journal of Business
and Management, 13(6), pp. 238-252.
Bogonko, W. (2016). The Examination of the Effectiveness of Internal Audit in County
Government of Nakuru. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) 18(4),
54-60.
Boţa-Avram, C. & Palfi. C. (2009). Measuring and assessment of internal audit’s effectiveness.
Economic Science Series 18 (3), 784-790.
Candreva, P. J. (2006). Controlling Internal Controls. Public Administration Review, 463 - 465.

16
Cohen, A. & Sayag, G. (2010). The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirical
Examination of its Determinants in Israeli Organisations. Australian Accounting Review,
20(3), pp. 296-307.
Crowther, D. & Lancaster, G. (2008). Research Methods: A Concise Introduction to Research in
Management and Business Consultancy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2010). AHandbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Fink, A. (2015). How to Conduct Surveys: a Step by Step Guide. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Fowler, F.J. (2012). Survey Research Methods. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
Gillham, B. (2010). Developing a Questionnaire. London/New York: Continuum.
Gliner, J.A. & Morgan, G.A. (2012). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated
Approach to Design and Analysis. New Jersey: Routledge.
Hammad, M. & Imdadullah, M. (2012). Factors that Contribute to the Effectiveness of Internal
Audit in Public Sector. International Proceedings of Economics Development and
Research, 55(28), 141–144.
Hendricks, D.W. (2011). Analyzing Quantitative Data: An Introduction for Social Researchers.
John Wiley & Sons.
Holt, T. P. & Deborah, A. S. (2008). The Need for an Internal Auditor Report to External
Stakeholders to Improve Governance Transparency. Accounting Horizons 22(4), 275-
288.
Karagiorgos, T. (2009). The Contribution of Internal Auditing to Management. International
Journal of Management Research and Technology 3 (2), Serials Publications, 417-427.
Mihret, D. G., & Yismaw, A. W. (2007). Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector
case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5), pp. 470-484.
Prawitt, D. F. (2009). Internal audit function quality and earnings management. The Accounting
Review, 84(4), 1255-1280.

17
Rezaee, Z. (2009). Corporate Governance and Ethics. The International Journal of Accounting
44(3), 306-307.
Rittenberg, L. E. (2006). Internal control: No small matter. Internal Auditor 63(5), 47-51.
Roziani, A. (2011). Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting; A study of Malaysian
Environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 2(1), 68–74.
Savcuk, O. (2007). Internal Audit Efficiency Evaluation Principles. Journal of Business
Economics and Management 6 (4), 275-284.
Savcuk, O. (2007). Internal Audit Efficiency Evaluation Principles. Journal of Business
Economics and Management 6(4), 275-284.
Van Staden, M., & Steyn, B. (2009). The profile of the chief audit executive as a driver of
internal audit quality. African Journal of Business Management 3(13), 918–925.
Zamzulaila, Z., Zarina, Z., & Dalila, M. I. (2007). The role of internal auditors in Malaysian
local authorities. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2(2), pp.
237-244.
Zohra, F.T. & Huq, U.R. 2014. The effects of internal audit report disclosure on investor
confidence and decisions. Journal of Business Studies 35 (2), pp. 131-150.