Analyzing Lee's Company using Hofstede's Five Cultural Dimensions

This report examines Lee's challenging situation at his company through the lens of Hofstede's five cultural dimensions. It explains how power distance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence versus restraint apply to Lee's workplace. The report analyzes Lee's behaviors and interactions, offering insights into the cultural differences between Korea and Australia. It discusses what Lee can do to adapt to the company culture while maintaining his work style. The report also provides recommendations for the Korean manager on how to manage individualistic employees and retain talent. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural perspectives in the workplace and the impact of these dimensions on the working relationship.

Running Head: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 1
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Name
University
Course
Tutor
Date

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 2
Professor Hofstede’s cultural dimension model is a clear way of understanding the cultural
differences that exist in the society. Lee’s case study explains his challenging situation at work
which when described using Hofstede’s model appears to be a regular occurrence.
Describe how Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions could be used to explain the situation at
Lee’s Company
The Power Distance Index (PDI) is the kind of gap that exists and is also accepted between those
with and without power. A high PDI is people have received the bridge created by power and
understand their position in the hierarchical distribution (Luger (2009)) low PDI, on the other
hand, comes in when there is the equal and widespread distribution of power exists, and
members of the society cannot accept when it is shared unequally. Lee is an employee who is
answerable to his manager and has to obey the commands from above for a healthy working
environment. There is, therefore, a high PDI in the company as workers have no much say to the
running and management of the business (Al-Sharqwi (2004).)
Individualism versus collectivism as the name suggests explains the ties people have towards
each other in an individual society. A high IDV comes in when people work towards their
responsibilities and end up having weak interpersonal communication. Collectivism, on the other
hand, people stick with a group and work towards the benefit of everyone involved. Lee seems to
have a high IDV as he works alone, completes the chores and that might be the reason as to why
he started receiving an unfriendly response (Marcus 2004, June)
Masculinity versus femininity exists with the distribution of responsibilities between men and
women. A masculine society has the expectations that men should be strong and prosperous, and
there is no overlap between their roles and those of women. A feminine society, on the other

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 3
hand, has a serious duplication and women feel that physical strength can be overcome by the
mental intellect (McDonough (2011)). Lee might have masculinity due to the way he works
alone to complete his chores before everyone else and head out. Like a mentality in a working
relationship might cause issues especially to the people who feel that work should be shared and
consulted.
Uncertainty Avoidance Index is another dimension that explains the different ways that people
deal with anxiety. With a high Uncertainty avoidance, individuals in the society strive to make
their lives predictable, and when they cannot control them, they end up putting their fate in a
super power like God (Migliore 2011). On a low UAI however, individuals tend to live a relaxed
and open life as there is no fear of the unknown. Lee’s case has a high UAI as he already predicts
the future of his working career and that worries him a lot to the extent that he wants to resign.
Indulgence versus Restraint usually explains the extent to which a society regulates the behavior
of its people. A society based on high IVR allows for individual gratification where everyone is
free to have fun and make their own choices. However, on a level IVR, the society regulates
people’s behaviors by enforcing strict norms. Lee’s company maintains a level IVR as he is
instructed to get rid of his casual look and follow all the rules that relate to the working
environment (Pierenburg (2011))

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 4
Discuss what; is anything Lee could do to remain at the company but continue to work in a
manner which he felt comfortable. Explain your reasons
Considering the dimensions mentioned above, Lee can still maintain his current job and get
comfortable. He should first change his perspective about work and observe the people close to
him for information. It is clear that Korea is different from Australia in the way people conduct
themselves as his behaviors seem to affect others in a negative way (Taras 2010). The power
Index should be his first consideration whereby he should be humble and give his superiors all
the respect they deserve. It is okay for him to question issues like the decisions made but
respectfully to have his voice heard. The reason as to why he is giving good suggestions and
none of them are getting implemented might be because of the way he relates to his superiors
(Taras 2010)
Collectiveness is again an important dimension to consider in working relationship because of a
good relationship with the team maneuvers success. Lee should, therefore, involve his colleagues
by asking for their views on his projects and engage them in making them feel useful. He should
also consider making a personal relationship with each one of them to improve the relationship.
The restraint dimension will also apply in this case, and he should try and fit in the group instead
of standing out which makes him a target of hatred (Jones 2007). Some employees would like to
dye their hair and wear casual jeans as Lee does, but it is not acceptable. When Lee does the
opposite of everyone, then the others feel that he thinks of himself unique and thus the kind of
treatment he receives. He can, however, suggest to the management on the acceptance of casual
wear to give everyone an equal basis, and not Lee alone.

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 5
How can the Korean Manager deal with more individualistic employees without losing the
competitive advantage of the talented workforce?
The Korean manager also has a role to play in ensuring that he can take control of his work
force. Some employee like Lee work differently, and since their skills are required, then
management should take all chances to maintain them (Wu 2006.)The manager can, for example,
demonstrate to Lee, the importance of team work by comparing the quality of work from an
individual and that produced by a group. Since the company requires great ideas in the sectors of
finances, sales and marketing, expansion and other areas, then consultation is necessary. Lee
should, therefore, be given valid reasons as to why working together brings success in any
organizations (Marcus 2004, June) He should also make sure that the employee feels welcome in
the environment to allow him to share with the rest of the team. Lee might be shying off from the
group due to fear of ridicule and criticism. It is therefore good to encourage the team to receive a
new employee and advise him according to the lifestyle of the organization.
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions are therefore applicable in our day to day activities depending on
the perception of the society that everyone resides. Lee’s case study is a good explanation as to
why people should try to understand each other’s perspective and work towards making
everyone comfortable. A working relationship can only be satisfying if the views and ideas of
each person are put into consideration.

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 6
References
Al-Sharqwi, SY (2004)., Hofstede's cultural dimensions and work-related values in Kuwait:
implications for employment policy.
Jones, ML 2007, Hofstede-culturally questionable?.
Luger, E (2009), Hofsteede's Cultural Dimensions.,. MünchenGRIN Verlag GmbH.
Marcus, AABVJ 2004, June, A practical set of culture dimensions for global user-interface
development. In Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction , 252261st edn,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
McDonough, S (2011), Connecting visual design and Hofstede's cultural dimensions: the United
States, Latin America and Spain. , University of Central Florida. , Orlando, Fla,.
Migliore, LA 2011, 'Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede's cultural
dimensions: Samples from the USA and India. ', An International Journal, vol 18(1), no. Cross
Cultural Management: , pp. pp.38-54.
Pierenburg, K (2011), Critical analysis of Hofstede's model of cultural dimensions to what extent
are his findings reliable, valid and applicable to organisations in the 21st century?, München,
GRIN Verlag GmbH.
Taras, V,KBLASP, 2010, Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade,
multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions.
Wu, M, 2006., 'Hofstede's cultural dimensions 30 years later: A study of Taiwan and the United
States. ', vol 15(1), no. Intercultural Communication Studies, p. p.33.

INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT 7