Analysis of EU-China Policy within International Political Framework

Verified

Added on  2023/01/06

|5
|660
|39
Report
AI Summary
This report provides an analysis of the EU-China policy, focusing on its international political dimensions. It examines the key considerations for the EU, including the importance of shared values, reciprocity, and opportunities for collaboration with China. The report applies frameworks of liberalism and realism to understand the political dynamics between the EU and China. It highlights the significance of national interests, political stability, and the impact of moral values. The report emphasizes the need for collaboration, especially in addressing global challenges like pandemics, and advocates for China's role as a responsible stakeholder in the international system. References to relevant literature are included to support the analysis, providing a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. The report concludes by underscoring the importance of these considerations for improving the political standing of the EU and promoting global political stability.
Document Page
INTERNATIONAL
POLITICAL ANALYSIS
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Table of Contents
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................2
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4
Document Page
MAIN BODY
The current article deals with the different pints which are necessary for the country to
consider at time of EU- China policy. This is very essential to be analysed at time of
international political analysis (Cohen, ed., 2017). The major reason underlying this fact is that
when the country operates in the global market then they have to decide for the political decision
keeping in mind all the global political situations. In the similar manner the when it comes to
EU- China policy then at that time also there were three major points to be considered. The first
one was the recognition that interest and values of EU are indivisible. The second on compass
was the reciprocity which states that the things must be decided with the mutual benefit of the
countries dealing with one another. This means that EU must welcome Chinese business to the
extent till Beijing respect the rules offered by EU. Along with this third compass states that
China and EU must always look for opportunities to work together.
In accordance with the International Political Analysis the scope of this is international as
this political analysis deals in the international market. This is related among two different
countries that is EU and China. Hence the scope of the article is related with the international
that is between two countries. When it comes to the framework applied for the international
political analysis the articles include the framework of liberalism and realism. The liberalism is a
type of political system which is based on consent and protecting and enhancing of the freedom
among the individual and having equality before law for every individual. Further the liberalism
can also be defined as the economic and political doctrine which majorly focuses on autonomy
of individual, equality and protection of rights of individual in a country.
On the flip side realism is a type of approach relating to political study and management
of practice relating to international politics. This theory mainly has a focus over the role of the
nation and state which is based on the assumption that is every state and nation is motivated with
the national interest and the moral concerns of the country. At the initial level the national
interest of all the countries are almost same that is having political stability and autonomy in the
country (Janker, Mann and Rist, 2018). In addition to this the moral values of the country varies
differently and has a different impact over the country and its working. With reference to the
case study it is clear and evident that the EU must go with China as and when the situation arises.
Document Page
In the present case as well of handling the pandemic the country must have focused on the
collaboration with other countries in order to improve the political system of the country. In
addition to this the invitation to Beijing for becoming responsible stakeholder within the
international system must be over the table that is they must go with the option (Graham and
Tucker, 2019). Hence, this will increase the political condition of the country and will improve
the political stability all over the globe.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Cohen, B.J. ed., 2017. International political economy. Routledge.
Graham, B.A. and Tucker, J.R., 2019. The international political economy data resource. The
Review of International Organizations. 14(1). pp.149-161.
Janker, J., Mann, S. and Rist, S., 2018. What is sustainable agriculture? Critical analysis of the
international political discourse. Sustainability. 10(12). p.4707.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]