University Analysis: Internet Intermediary Liability in Defamation Law
VerifiedAdded on  2023/06/03
|6
|1439
|166
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a comprehensive summary of the legal issues surrounding internet intermediary liability in defamation cases. It examines various models used to determine liability, including strict liability, broad immunity, safe harbour, generalist, and notice-and-notice approaches. The report discusses the application of these models in different jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, analyzing relevant legislation like the E-Commerce Regulations, the Communications Decency Act, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It highlights the balance between protecting freedom of expression and addressing the spread of defamatory content, referencing international human rights frameworks. The report also delves into specific case studies, such as AY v Facebook and Karim v Newsquest Media Group Ltd, to illustrate how these legal principles are applied in practice. The analysis covers the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries, the concept of 'knowledge' in determining liability, and the challenges of content monitoring and removal. The report concludes by emphasizing the ongoing efforts to address this complex issue and the limitations of existing protections.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 6