Analyzing IoT Connectivity: Technologies, Challenges, and Applications

This essay provides an in-depth analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) connectivity, exploring its meaning, advantages, and challenges across industrial and domestic sectors. It discusses various connectivity options such as short-range and long-range wireless, cellular, and extra-terrestrial connectivity, highlighting the rapid growth of cellular IoT and the potential of 5th generation wireless technology. The essay examines the role of IoT connectivity in industries like healthcare, farming, and security, and identifies key stakeholders involved in its development. It further delves into specific connectivity solutions like LPWA, cellular, and extra-terrestrial options, comparing their bandwidth, range, and reliability. The paper also addresses issues related to data rate, connectivity cost, and limitations such as resistance to change, protocol proliferation, higher energy consumption, compatibility issues, and data security. The conclusion emphasizes connectivity as a fundamental aspect of IoT, supporting digital transformation and new business models.

INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
Internet of Things (IoT) Connectivity
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
The prime determination of this essay is to determine the connectivity aspects of Internet
of things. This paper will provide in depth knowledge about the different challenges and issues
related to connectivity. All the different connectivity devices used in smart cities are discussed in
this paper with prime importance. Now coming to the meaning of connectivity, it can be said that
it is the process by which the user data are added to the network, processed, stored and finally
analyzed using different types of platform. This working principal is used in almost every
networking system (Zanella et al., 2014). The concept of data intensive environment can be
successfully implemented using the concept of IoT connectivity. There are many advantages
regarding the connectivity in both industrial sector and domestic sector and at the same time it
can be said that there are different types of issues as well related to it which will be discussed in
the later units of this paper.
The internet of things can be defined as a network of physical device, vehicles, home
appliances, electronic gadgets, software, sensors and acculators. Connectivity is a very essential
aspect of the cloud and network communication now a day as a huge number of corporations are
getting the benefit of using cloud services to avoid data explosion. Adaptation is the key to
success in the IoT world, along with that it can be said that connectivity is very important for the
evolving networking technologies also (Andreev et al., 2015). The improved connectivity aspects
are really helpful in optimizing the available resource in a private corporation as it provides a
huge amount of security and privacy to the data which are circulated with the organization or
outside it.
There are generally two categories of connectivity of internet of things in the smart city
which is the short range wireless connectivity and the long range wireless connectivity. Even the
satellite connections are also dependent on the connectivity of the internet of things (Mahmoud

2INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
& Mohamad, 2016). The connectivity of internet of things in cellular technology is growing at a
rapid speed. By the end of the year 2021 there will be around more than 30 billion users of
cellular internet of things. The growth of the non-cellular internet of things are also not far
behind the cellular technology. The growth of the users of the non-cellular technology was found
to be around 3-4% every year. The enhanced connectivity options will give rise many new
technologies as well. The extensive growth and development in the field of cellular technology is
also seen, as the 5th generation wireless technology rolling down the floor by the end of 2019.
Connectivity is the main reason behind the successful implementation of the internet of
things in different sectors such as healthcare industry, farming, fishing and space technology.
The different types of wireless internet of things sensors which transmit information about the
soil moisture and other non-living resources are used in the farming technology (Mumtaz et al.,
2017). Internet of things with alarm systems are connected in each corner of the museums and
government building which provides security to the living and the non-living aspects of the
organization. Long term protection can be provided to the homeowners with the help of
improved internet of things based technologies. The different types of wearable fitness devices
are also based on the connectivity of the internet of things. The devices have improved
connection in every environment irrespective of the climate and other adverse conditions (Bello,
Zeadally & Badra, 2017). The connectivity of internet of things is also used in the healthcare
industries as it helps in monitoring the activity levels of the patients, these devices provide
efficient feedback on heart rate and respiration.
There are different categories of stakeholder who are associated with the designing and
development of the internet of things connectivity such as the chipset and the radio makers,
platform vendors are the other stakeholders associated with the IoT based devices. The

3INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
manufacturers of the devices and the corporation which implements those systems in their
environment are other types of stakeholders associated with the internet of things. The
corporations which have implemented the internet of things or planning to use internet of things
can select from more than 30 different connectivity options having different bandwidth, range,
reliability, cost, specifications and network management features. The choice of the internet of
things is generally based on the needs and requirements of the corporations. The different types
of connectivity solutions which are generally chosen by the global corporations are the
unlicensed one, low power, LPWA, cellular and extra-terrestrial (Madakam, Ramaswamy &
Tripathi, S2015). Each of these categories has a unique characteristic’s and specifications
comparing the bandwidth, range and the other connectivity feature. The full potential of the
internet of things based systems are properly analyzed before they are incorporated into a
system. The unlicensed solutions are very much expensive compared with the other type of types
of connectivity devices, however it can be said that the unlicensed devices are more prone to
outside interferences such as the adverse weather conditions such as the thunder storms and
cyclones, electrical obstacles. Transmission of the signals of the wireless technologies is not very
smooth due to the different building barriers.
The different connectivity options are discussed in this section of the paper. Our first
topic of discussion is the LPWA which is the Low Power Wide Area connectivity. The two main
specifications of the LPWA are low power and wide area. Low power specification allows
devices to operate for many years which collects data on an hourly basis and it has a significant
impact on the battery self-discharge and degradation (Mineraud et al., 2016). The wide area
delivers at least 500 meters of signal range from the gateway of the device to the end point.
There are connectivity issues mostly in the urban and the underground locations.

4INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
The LPWA provides longer battery and extensive range with a lower cost than the other
type of connectivity options (Patton et al., 2014). LPWA is a huge aspect of internet of things
connectivity. Around 20 percent of the total global networking population is covered by the
LPWA networks and the growth and development in the field of networking technology are
enhancing the service provided by this connectivity option. The application of the low power
mode wide area is increasing the internet of things connectivity. Some of the global corporations
are developing and implementing the proprietary LPWA technologies such as the Link labs,
Lora, weightless and Sigfox. The narrow band IoT is the most widely used connectivity option
these days. Each of the options has its own characteristics features such as the Sigma have the
capability to manage its own network whereas LoRa has the support of more than 400
networking partner. The narrowband technology internet of things depends upon the existing
cellular technology and are applied in large scale productions.
Cellular connectivity is the other important aspect of the connectivity in the internet of
things. The availability and the reliability of the cellular connectivity are much more than the
LPWA. The speed provided by the cellular connectivity is a maximum of 100 megabytes per
second (Höller et al., 2014). The limitation associated with the cellular connectivity is the higher
maintenance cost and higher power consumption. As most of the IoT based systems run on a
battery so the higher battery consumption is bigger issue for all those IoT based systems.
The other type of connectivity is the extra-terrestrial connectivity which is used in the
space technology specially in the satellite. Even the most recent microwave technologies are also
using the extraterrestrial connectivity. Even this technology is also used in the defence sector
also in the unmanned drones (Zachariah et al., 2015). This type of connectivity has low to
medium bandwidth and the reliability provided by this connectivity varies from medium to high

5INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
so it can be said that the effectiveness of this connectivity is maintained. However, this is not
usually used in the industrial sector due to the compatibility issues.
The internet of things connectivity is used in different types of industries in smart cities
such as the automotive industry where the bandwidth is potentially low and have a very low
capability to manage a network (Aijaz & Aghvami, 2015). The manufacturing industry uses the
internet of things in optimizing their operations, it has a very low bandwidth but is very much
reliable. Asset management is very much useful in the defence industry which uses the internet
of things connectivity. The internet of things connectivity is managed with the help of the
network which has a very long range and is very much reliable. Yield optimization and asset
management are one of the specification of internet of things used in the agricultural industry
which have a higher reliability. Predictive maintenance is one of the main specification of the
internet of things used in mining industry, construction industry, oil and gas sector, it has a very
low bandwidth. Asset management is one of the most important specifications of the insurance
industry which uses the advanced internet of things connectivity. Remote monitoring which is
one of the most important specifications of the healthcare industry which is extensively managed
with the help of the advanced internet of things connectivity.
The other essential application of the internet of things connectivity is energy
management in the consumer industries (Jin et al., 2014). Productivity optimization,
personalization, energy monitoring is the other important feature of this industry which are
actively managed by the internet of things.
Data rate and Connectivity cost are the other types of issues related to the application of
internet of things connectivity. The growth and development in the field of broadband have led

6INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
to the growth of the cellular bands (Wortmann & Flüchter, 2015). The growth of the LTE bands
with TDD options is also very much on the rising scale. The measurement of the frequencies is
much better evaluated with the help of the internet of things connectivity. There are significant
developments in the meter bands, centimeter bands and millimeter band. Water quality
monitoring can be done with the help of the internet of things.
There are several types of short range wireless technologies such as the Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
and Zigbee which are the most commonly used IoT enabled devices (Weyrich & Ebert, 2016).
The satellite technologies which uses the internet of things connectivity are VSAT, LPWAN and
BGAN. These IoT connectivity technologies provides the network infrastructure and the
capability to communicate between more than one device.
The enhanced specifications of the internet of things connectivity are discussed in this
research essay and this unit of the paper will be focusing on the limitations (Mihovska & Sarkar,
2018). The prime limitation of IoT connectivity is the resistance to change in the business
organization who are planning to implement new IoT based technologies in their existing
environment. Management of the complexities associated with the incorporation of the IoT based
technologies is very much crucial for the maximum effectiveness of those technologies. Protocol
proliferation is the other type of complexity associated with IoT connectivity. The higher energy
consumption is the other type of drawback of the IoT connectivity. There are different types of
compatibility issues related to the application if the internet of things connectivity (Lee & Lee,
2015). Data security is the other important networking challenges associated with the internet of
things connectivity.

7INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
From the above paper, it can be concluded that connectivity is one of the prime
foundations of the internet of things connectivity as it is responsible for supporting the digital
transformation and development of the new business models and offerings. Billions of internet of
things devices can be connected with the help of the cellular networks. The connectivity of the
internet of things provides reliability, security and scalability to all its users. The future of the
internet of things connectivity is very much optimistic due to the constant evolvement of
technologies. The needs and requirements of the users are changing every day which is the main
reason behind the introduction of the newer networking technologies. The importance of data
which are transmitted from one system to another is increasing everyday as any kind of data
leakage may cause huge loss to business organizations who are implementing the internet of
things connectivity.

8INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
Reference
Aijaz, A., & Aghvami, A. H. (2015). Cognitive machine-to-machine communications for
Internet-of-Things: A protocol stack perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2(2),
103-112.
Andreev, S., Galinina, O., Pyattaev, A., Gerasimenko, M., Tirronen, T., Torsner, J., ... &
Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary
M2M radio technology roadmap. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9), 32-40.
Bello, O., Zeadally, S., & Badra, M. (2017). Network layer inter-operation of Device-to-Device
communication technologies in Internet of Things (IoT). Ad Hoc Networks, 57, 52-62.
Höller, J., Boyle, D., Karnouskos, S., Avesand, S., Mulligan, C., & Tsiatsis, V. (2014). From
machine-to-machine to the internet of things (pp. 1-331). Cambridge: Academic Press.
Jin, J., Gubbi, J., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2014). An information framework for creating
a smart city through internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 1(2), 112-121.
Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and
challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431-440.
Madakam, S., Ramaswamy, R., & Tripathi, S. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT): A literature
review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3(05), 164.
Mahmoud, M. S., & Mohamad, A. A. (2016). A study of efficient power consumption wireless
communication techniques/modules for internet of things (IoT) applications.

9INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY
Mihovska, A., & Sarkar, M. (2018). Smart connectivity for internet of things (iot) applications.
In New Advances in the Internet of Things (pp. 105-118). Springer, Cham.
Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X., & Tarkoma, S. (2016). A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things
platforms. Computer Communications, 89, 5-16.
Mumtaz, S., Alsohaily, A., Pang, Z., Rayes, A., Tsang, K. F., & Rodriguez, J. (2017). Massive
Internet of Things for industrial applications: Addressing wireless IIoT connectivity
challenges and ecosystem fragmentation. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 11(1),
28-33.
Patton, M., Gross, E., Chinn, R., Forbis, S., Walker, L., & Chen, H. (2014, September).
Uninvited connections: A study of vulnerable devices on the internet of things (IoT). In
Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (JISIC), 2014 IEEE Joint (pp. 232-
235). IEEE.
Weyrich, M., & Ebert, C. (2016). Reference architectures for the internet of things. IEEE
Software, 33(1), 112-116.
Wortmann, F., & Flüchter, K. (2015). Internet of things. Business & Information Systems
Engineering, 57(3), 221-224.
Zachariah, T., Klugman, N., Campbell, B., Adkins, J., Jackson, N., & Dutta, P. (2015, February).
The internet of things has a gateway problem. In Proceedings of the 16th international
workshop on mobile computing systems and applications (pp. 27-32). ACM.
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for
smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 1(1), 22-32.

10INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONNECTIVITY