Legal Analysis: Iran v. USA Case on International Business Law Issues

This case study examines the legal aspects of international business, focusing on the dispute between the Republic of Iran and the United States of America. The assignment delves into the background of the case, which involves the alleged damaging of Iranian oil platforms by the USA, and the legal arguments presented by both parties. It highlights the role of international law, specifically the Treaty of Amity and the UN Charter, in addressing the conflict. The analysis includes the application of relevant legal principles, such as the prohibition on the use of force and the right to self-defense. The conclusion summarizes the court's findings and the implications for international business law, emphasizing the importance of treaties and international cooperation in resolving disputes. The study uses the case to illustrate the complexities and challenges in international trade and commerce.

Legal Aspects of International
Business and Enterprise

INTRODUCTION
The rapid increase in International Trade and Commerce, gives the regulations of
International Law, the objective of this law is to promote affluence, nature of good
investments. The dynamic mechanism of International Law, falls into the scattered
division of Private International Law and Public International Law. Admittedly, there
is significantly role imbricating the characteristics between these two categories. The
postulates of international trade, are dismaying and formidable, A trade generally
starts with initiating a contract of sale,

Background of the dispute
 Issues and facts of the Case-
The present case was Republic of Iran v. United States of America (2003), The
Republic of Iran, carried out proceeding by filling an application in the court office
against United States, in regard to the issue of USA damaging the Iranian Oil
Platforms. Legalities by supportive nature available to Iran instates the jurisdiction in
front of the court by the Treaty of Amity, the initiation of Lucrative (Economical) and
Delegated rights between the United States and Iran were documented at Tehran, in
the formation of that treated signed, Iran was ostensibly claimed that the oil rigged
were diminished entirely from the fault warships of United States (Mistry, 2020).

Continue…
 Rule of Application-
The forbidding put on the use of applied force which is prescribed in the directives of
international law is represented in the traditional global law and in the Charter of
UN (Article 2(4)), but it does not cover , forfeiting of a states exercising the right of
self defence , the reinstatement of the duties and requirements of the self security in
the customary international statues , is states in the case of Nicaragua v United
States of America (Li,2019). The clear protection of the UN Charter, with involving
the Article 51 abstraction from Article 2 (4). on the distinctive situation arrived in
regard to security council and looking after the action of US amount to legality of
Iran

Analysis
In the factual circumstances and the difference of opinion mentioned above, Iran
requested the court of law, to adjudicated on the footing of, the court of law has the
administration to look after the Treaty of Amity, which will eventually which will
beguile the conflicts and consider the submissions which are made by Iran, that the
diminishing and rolled out rupturing the oil platforms, which was all mentioned in
the statements mentioned by Iran. The United States has breached the liabilities to
Iran, Under the Article 1, 4 (1) and 10 (1) of the formulations of Treaty of Harmony
and on the groundwork of international law

CONCLUSION
On the mentioned date of 5 March 2003, on the grounds of the claim asserted by Iran
republican and the cross action claims introduced by the America, US appealed to
the court of law to adjudicate' that the America did not violate any of its liabilities in
respect to the The Iran republican, applying the protocol of Article 10, para (1),
withholding the concord of 1955, and that the claims which are presented by the Iran
republican, are terminated accordingly (Kandogan, and Hiller, 2018).

REFRENCES
 Garbellini, N., 2021. International trade as a process of choice of
technique. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, pp.42-50.
 Mishra, A.K., Vinzé, A.S., Gupta, R.S. and Menon, R., 2021. Advances in
Innovation, Trade and Business. Springer International Publishing.
 Vallina-Hernandez, A.M., de la Fuente-Mella, H. and Fuentes-Solís, R., 2020.
International trade and innovation: delving in Latin American
commerce. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración.