Significance of Judicial Administration in the United States

This report examines the significance of judicial administration in the United States, focusing on its structure, processes, and administration. It begins with an introduction to the judiciary system as a mechanism for conflict resolution, highlighting its role in interpreting laws. The discussion section delves into the three-tiered structure of the US jurisdiction, including district courts, circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court, outlining their respective functions in criminal and civil cases. The report then explores the processes involved in judicial administration, such as in personam and in rem jurisdiction, and the importance of due process. It also examines the administration aspects, including the adversarial system, the rights of the accused, and the overarching objectives of protecting citizens' rights and interpreting the law. The report emphasizes key concepts like judicial control and the balance between justice and individual rights within the American legal framework.

Running Head: SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note:

1SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction................................................................................................................................2
Discussion..................................................................................................................................2
Literature review....................................................................................................................2
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................9
References................................................................................................................................10

2SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Introduction
Judicial administration of United States is posed on individual court. Judiciary system
refers to the practices of the court that interprets the policies of law on behalf of the state.
Epstein et al., (2015) considers the judiciary system as the mechanism for the resolution of
the conflicts. The judiciary system belongs to the doctrine related to the separation of the
power. The judiciary system does not make any statutory law or any other law. The judiciary
system varies from place to place. Courts having judicial capacity branches contains the
capacity to change the laws and processes of the judicial review. Rhee, (2013) mentioned that
in the general practice of jurisdiction the interpretation of law involves the constitution,
regulations, and statutes. They also possess the capability to create laws according to the
requirement of the case. On the other hand, Bohm & Haley, (2017) mentioned about the civil
law and jurisdiction where the courts interpret the law, however this procedure has the
prohibition of creating any rule or regulation. Hence, this study will demonstrate the
significance of Jurisdiction administration of United States. It will describe the structure,
administration, and the processes of the judicial system.
Discussion
Literature review
Structure
Born & Rutledge, (2018) mentioned that the jurisdiction of United States possess
three levels. It includes the district court, the circuit court of appeals, and the supreme court.
All the three levels possess different functioning and functionality for the criminal cases.
Chin & Vernon (2014) mentioned about the history to demonstrate the structure of the
Jurisdiction system of United States. At the initial stage, the court of the state heard about the
legal matters about its citizens. At that time of period, the jurisdiction was demonstrated

3SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
according to the geographical locations. According to the period, the Supreme Court heard
about the cases considering the national attention and it involved the cases that possess the
rights that had been violated by the state court (Bassiouni, 2014). The Supreme court was
then considered as the court of appellate. With the time, the young country started to take
initiative to develop and expand the matters situated outside the states. On the other hand,
Freer (2017) mentioned about the assemble of the congress and started the debate that
required a separate court namely the higher court. The purpose of the initiation of the
appellate court was to try the cases with the constitutional rights. There is various argument
about the believes about the federal law that need to be arbitrated in the state at the initial
stage.
Freer (2017) mentioned about the structure of the district court. The district court of
United States possess the jurisdiction with the case that includes both the civil and criminal
activities. The civil actions need to be arise through the violation of any individual’s violation
of the constitutional rules or regulations. The cases of civil maritime involves the citizens
from various states that are also heard in the courts situated at the districts (Bassiouni, 2014).
The criminal cases of the United States, have the procedure of jurisdiction about hearing the
similarity related to the United States party and its relation to the suit. The judge possess the
complete power to determine the seriousness of the issue. Llewellyn, (2016) mentioned than
94 district courts in the United States. The U.S Circuit Court of Appeals hears about the cases
that has close connection with either one or both the involved parties which are dissatisfied
with the procedure of judgement within the U.S District court. The lower level of the court
ruling has three types of judges who determines the seriousness of the case and provides
decision according to the seriousness of the issue. Llewellyn (2016) mentioned that there
more than 13 Circuit Court of Appeals within the U.S. The study also mentioned that, these
are the courts with the supreme power. Along with this, it also mentioned that there are more

4SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
than 179 permanent judges with the jurisdiction administration of the United States.
However, the process allows only three judges to complete the hearing of a single case.
Neubauer & Fradella, (2018) demonstrated the structure of the supreme court situated
in the administration procedure of the United States. It is the highest authoritarian court in the
United States jurisdiction framework. Article number 3 of the constitution of United States
demonstrates that the Supreme Court and the authorized body of Congress has to pass the
laws for establishing any system or regulation in the lower courts. In the procedure of the
federal jurisdiction the 94 district level courts (considered as trial courts) and the other 13
courts comes under the authority of the Supreme court. Apart from this, there are appellate
panels for bankruptcy that possess 3 panels with proper authorization (Eagly & Shafer, 2015).
These authorization needs to hear the appeals from the bankruptcy court decisions. These are
the panels that need the federal courts of appeals and that must be situated by the circuit court
of appeal. The Congress party generated various articles on the jurisdiction procedure of the
United States. Among them, the Article number 1 or the courts of legislation have the entire
power to control (Epstein et al., 2015). Judicial control is the ultimate authority that need to
become the final decision maker for all the constitutional law.
Processes
Bassiouni, (2014) defines the term jurisdiction first to demonstrate the processes of
Jurisdiction in the United States. According to the definition it is the power of the
government to generate legal interest and formulate courts as the decision maker about the
limits and capabilities of the states and the citizens to access the power. To understand the
procedure of the jurisdiction of United States it is important to understand the nature of the
suit that has been introduced within the court (Llewellyn, 2016). In case of introducing any
dispute against a person in spite of any property, the proceedings need to be considered in

5SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
personam, where the jurisdiction establishes the defendants individual to render a fruitful
decree. Freer (2017) mentioned that, in the common cases the existence within the state is
enough to formulate a personal jurisdiction in spite of an individual in case of serving any
process.
On the other hand, in case of a resident who is not existed within the state domicile
alone is considered to be enough to make him exist within the reach of the state courts. The
reason behind this is to provide personal judgement to the person (Karlen, 2014). However, it
is worth to be mentioned in this regard, the defendant, left at his last and common place of
abode where the family continues to reside is an inadequate initiative as it is not reasonable to
calculate or provide actual notice about the procedure and related opportunities to be heard.
Born & Rutledge, (2018) also mentioned about the case of a non-resident. The study
mentioned that there is a clear mention that no individual should be deprived from the issues
including poverty rights through the decree. It will consider all the case without the
appearance not serving for the effectiveness of the party. During the time of initial cases, the
process of one court was not able to run into another and the summon a resident of the
mentioned state for providing the response to proceed against the case. A single consent was
enough to formulate the jurisdiction even in the case where the person is absent or have any
connection with the litigation and the related forum.
Roberts, (2018) mentioned about an example where the appearance of the defendant
challenged the jurisdiction procedure of the court that was deemed with a voluntary
submission with the power of the court. In case of any special case of denying the jurisdiction
can be treated as the behavior of consensual issue and submission to the related court (Karlen,
2014). In this case, the concept of construct consent being seized upon as the basic
requirement for obtaining or appealing to the jurisdiction facilities. As example, it can be said
that, the case of the automobile, the state was provided with the permission to become

6SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
engaged with the fiction including the conditioned highways among the consent of the related
drivers to use in the state courts in case of any accidents or other transactions that are being
raised by these kinds of use. Reiman & Leighton, (2015) mentioned that, the court provides
the approval of the legal fiction with the jurisdiction created out of any consent. The basis of
these kind of jurisdiction was actually the power of the state to generate the acts performed in
the state which were dangerous for any individual or any particular property.
Karlen (2014) mentioned about a curious fact about the United States jurisdiction
while describing the process. It depicts that a corporation possess no legal existence outside
the geographical boundary of the state charter. Hence, the basic level of the state court and its
jurisdiction for the foreign corporation has been possessing an uncertain rather than certain
with due respect to the individuals. On the other hand, the corporations with ‘continuous and
systematic’ affiliation with the forum that make them the essential home as a broadly
amendable for the suit.
Administration
Lynch, (2014) mentioned about the importance of judicial system of the United States
at the time of describing the administration of the United States. The system possess two
kinds of major objectives for protecting the rights of the citizens and the proper interpretation
of the law in relation to the existing case. The Judicial system is comprised of different stages
of courts including the state court and the district court for dealing with different kinds of
problems associated with the society (Bricongne, Garcia & Turrini, 2019). The courts are
based on the system of adversarial concept about the notion of justice. In this type of system,
the litigants deliver their cases in front of the neutral body that refers to the jury or the judge
of the selected court. The situation provide them the argument from each side that allow the
judge to investigate the truth or the conflict related to the case. In spite of providing

7SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
documented arguments, the evidences and the testimonies are presented to both the parties
and the court also.
Bohm & Haley, (2017) mentioned that in case of any criminal case, the prosecution
and the judge need to perform for the government and for the system at the same point of
time. The rights of the procedure relate all the processes that are created to promote fairness
that allow all the parties the scope to positively present the case. With the standardizing
procedure all the court cases are executed, the regulations restricts the government from
convicting the accused individual without providing any scope for properly defend the self
from the charges. The most general procedure in this regard is the right that is actually
enforced at the time of the accused become arrested for the first time.
Csonka, Juszczak & Sason, (2017) again demonstrated the three branches of the
judicial procedure that the government has set up for founding the root of the cases. The
system of the cases, protects all the individuals from the undue of the prosecution.
Quintanilla, (2013) mentioned that a person would much rather that of numerous guilty
person should escape from the punishment of death, rather than that one innocent individual
is directed to be condemned or capital sufferings. This is the basic rule that is situated at the
heart of the American Judicial system. This concept can be viewed with much broader
perspective as it involves the rights of freedom about all the citizens of America.
Magherescu, (2019) mentioned that, while the entire system of Jurisdiction is charged with
the task of interpreting and proper application of the law for a specific case, the Supreme
court of the same framework has the responsibility to decide and determine the law
(Bricongne, Garcia & Turrini, 2019). On the same hand, the Judicial framework follows the
system to obey the determinations from the previous cases and the related rules and
regulations. Along with this, the entire system and the courts needs to obey the rules and
regulation mentioned within the constitution.

8SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Bricongne, Garcia & Turrini, (2019) mentioned that, the right and regulation provided
to the population of America belong to the Bills of Rights that are the basic criteria for the
Judicial system to hear any case and provide the decisions. Along with this, the study
mentioned that no matter what the domain includes (marriage, health, voting, and
immigration) the federal courts of the United States plays an important role within the lives
of all the people of America. The study only focuses on the existence of two types of courts
including the state and the federal court. It defines the federal court as the bodies to settle the
disagreements with due concern to the constitution, state-based disputes, and the
congressional legislations. Rhee, (2013) mentioned that most of the Americans are familiar
with the term called lifetime appointment at the United States supreme court, there are many
other surprising things one of them is more than 900 judges contain lifetimes appointment for
the judicial systems. In the United States, the administrative office is designed with 23 posts
regarding the judicial emergencies to determine the critical tasks. According to the dictation
of the American Constitution, the president is appointed as the federal judge at the time of the
Senate providing advices to the consents related to these appointments. Hence, the outcome
of the American judicial system is delicate with the desire of the White House as the
difference from the home-state senators.

9SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that, the politics of the United States plays a greater role
in the judicial system. Researchers have observed that, the judges often possess fickleness in
their decision at the time of deliberate processes. It is considered as one of the greater issue
associated with the judicial system of the United States. It refers that the judicial system of
the United States and the federal judges possess repercussions on the lives of the common
people. Researchers often stated that the federal system of the United States often affects the
progressive aspects associated with the entire judicial procedure. For an instance, the crime
related to gun violence has become a common agenda for the people of America. However,
there are enough evidence that show reasonable control over the use of guns that reduces the
use of gun as a medium of public threat. It is situated at the center of the progress of the
Americans. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of United States has possess equal eye for
all the cases within the nation and properly obey the amendments made in the constitution of
America.

10SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
References
Bassiouni, M. C. (2014). International extradition: United States law and practice. Oxford
University Press.
Bohm, R. M., & Haley, K. N. (2017). Introduction to criminal justice. McGraw-Hill
Education.
Born, G. B., & Rutledge, P. B. (2018). International civil litigation in United States courts.
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Bricongne, J. C., Garcia, N. M., & Turrini, A. (2019). Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure,
economic reforms and policy progress in the European Union (No. 87). Sciences Po.
Cassella, S. D. (2018). Asset Forfeiture Law in the United States. In The Palgrave Handbook
of Criminal and Terrorism Financing Law (pp. 427-446). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Chin, G. J., & Vernon, C. J. (2014). Reasonable but unconstitutional: Racial profiling and the
radical objectivity of Whren v. United States. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 83, 882.
Csonka, P., Juszczak, A., & Sason, E. (2017). The establishment of the European Public
Prosecutor’s Office. The road from vision to reality. EUCRIM, 125-133.
Eagly, I. V., & Shafer, S. (2015). A national study of access to counsel in immigration
court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1-91.
Epstein, L., Segal, J. A., Spaeth, H. J., & Walker, T. G. (2015). The Supreme Court
compendium: Data, decisions, and developments. Cq Press.
Freer, R. D. (2017). Aspen Treatise for Civil Procedure. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Karlen, D. (2014). Appellate Courts in the United States and England (Vol. 22). Quid Pro
Books.

11SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Llewellyn, K. N. (2016). The common law tradition: deciding appeals (Vol. 16). Quid Pro
Books.
Lynch, G. E. (2014). Our administrative system of criminal justice. Fordham L. Rev., 83,
1673.
Magherescu, D. (2019). Admission of Guilt Agreement as a Special Procedure of the Penal
Trial–A Particular Attention upon the Romanian Model.
Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2018). America's courts and the criminal justice system.
Cengage Learning.
Quintanilla, V. D. (2013). Critical race empiricism: A new means to measure civil
procedure. UC Irvine L. Rev., 3, 187.
Reiman, J., & Leighton, P. (2015). Rich get richer and the poor get prison, the
(subscription): Ideology, class, and criminal justice. Routledge.
Resnik, J. (2014). The Privatization of Process: Requiem for and Celebration of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure at 75. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1793-1838.
Rhee, W. (2013). Evidence-Based Federal Civil Rulemaking: A New Contemporaneous Case
Coding Rule. Pace L. Rev., 33, 60.
Roberts, J. (2018). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge.