Justifying Hacktivism: Moral High Ground or Virtual Vigilantism?
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/12
|20
|1041
|340
Presentation
AI Summary
This presentation delves into the complex question of whether hacktivism is morally justified or simply virtual vigilantism. It begins by defining hacktivism as the use of computerized software to promote political agendas or highlight societal issues, acknowledging both its potential benefits and risks. The presentation explores the differing views on hacktivism, considering it as a form of protest, web defacement, and a tool for promoting fundamental rights. It discusses the role of hacktivist groups like WikiLeaks and Anonymous, highlighting their involvement in revealing human rights issues and challenging institutional confidentiality. The presentation also addresses counterarguments, noting the potential for hackers to act with ulterior motives and undermine democratic principles. Ultimately, it emphasizes the mixed nature of hacktivism, acknowledging its capacity for both positive political mobilization and negative impacts on society, referencing scholars who underscore the importance of upholding civil rights in cyber activities. Desklib provides a platform to access this and other resources for students.
1 out of 20