Essay on Administrative Intelligence and Kautilya's Enduring Relevance

This essay delves into the concept of administrative intelligence, tracing its historical roots and evolution, with a particular focus on the enduring relevance of Kautilya's Arthashastra. The paper examines how Kautilya's principles of statecraft, governance, and political strategy, articulated in his seminal work, continue to resonate in the modern world. It explores the application of Kautilya's ideas on topics such as political intelligence, recruitment of ministers, the role of spies, and the use of women in warfare, comparing them with contemporary practices. The essay also addresses the evolving nature of intelligence, comparing ancient and modern approaches, and considers the strengths and limitations of applying Kautilya's theories in today's complex geopolitical landscape. It also explores the concept of a welfare state, economic policies, administrative reforms, good governance, and foreign trade. The essay concludes by asserting the continued significance of Kautilya's insights, while acknowledging the need for nuanced interpretation in the face of rapid global change and provides a comparison between Western and Indian concept of state and war.

Running head: ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
Administrative Intelligence
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s note:

1ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
There is no gain stating the obvious fact that human intelligence, since the inception of
mankind, has experienced a steady evolution over a course of thousand years. The general
intelligence of any individual is defined as his ability to acquire as well as to apply his
knowledge in life, foreseeing the possible outcome, and adopting necessary strategies to fulfil or
combat the same. With the advent of technology and scientific advancement, the intelligence
acquisition method has also largely improved with time, and with the presence of spy agencies
and smart thinking robots, the transformation of intelligence architecture has undergone a rapid,
profound transformation. However, while scientific advancement has facilitated the invention of
new machines and robots that have helped in the development of various branches of intelligence
science such as cognitive science, artificial intelligence and brain science it should be
remembered that the origin of intelligence can be traced back to 100 years (Mitra and Liebig
2017). As the most powerful advisor and popular dictator in the court of Chandragupta Maurya,
Kautilya was the ultimate realist and famous pragmatist, whose eminent political treatise
Arthasastra, intended to enlighten a wise king how best to govern and administer the empire, in
the most discreet way. Although the treatise concerning itself with war and diplomacy seems to
be most relevant at a time of empires and kingdom, it should be remembered that Kautilya still
remains relevant in today’s world. As one of the greatest and most popular political books of the
ancient world, written back around the time of 300 BCE, Arthasastra remains highly relevant
today. This widely read and well-received treatise is the source of wisdom and intelligence even
in the 21st century, and needless to state that his ideas of a welfare state, economic policies and
administrative reforms, good governance as well as foreign trade are even applied today.

2ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
Before explaining how Kautilya remains relevant even today, when one seeks to define
intelligence, it is important to see how has intelligence evolved and progressed over the ages. In
many aspects the political intelligence in present world aligns with the concepts in Kautiliyan
Arthashastra. According to Gautam (2013) the concept of punishment and discipline in the
political system, the manner of appointment of ministers in 21st century aligns with the
Kautilya’s principles. Kautilya elucidated the method of recruitment of councilors, spies, priests,
envoys and how to protect princes and educate them. Further, Arthashastra also highlighted how
to keep the treatment of the prince under restrain. It explained the role and duties of the king
towards state in detail, the personal safety of king and duties of king towards female quarters. In
present world the recruitment of ministers based on certain educational qualifications and team
of professionals hired for their protection and personal safety can be traced back to Kautilya’s
Arthashastra (Shoham and Liebig 2016). It can be concluded that today’s political environment
to a great extent is governed by the Kautilya’s principles.
Intelligence in present is as old as time although the intelligent agencies are new. As per
Liebig (2014) Arthashastra emphasise on keeping the conduct of the ministers and prince under
confinement. It is the concept of vijigisu, where the king takes the responsibility to defend the
state. Its application in present day can be related with the Obama’s overarching strategy in
tracking Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The strategies used by Obama
to protect the state were confined and were disclosed only to operation team. Gautam (2013)
studied the relevance of Kautilya’s principles in modern India. First evidence of political
intelligence originating from these principles in India comes from Jawaharlal Nehru studying
Kautilya Arthashastra in Prison. Other evidences were given by the current President Pranab
Mukherjee and NSA Shivshankar Menon who are discursively engaged with

3ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
Kautilya’s thoughts. It gain indicates that the intelligence is as old as time. In contemporary
Indian life, the symbolic representation of Kautiliyan thought in street names and names of
educational institutions is found. The political strategic documents do not explicitly refer to
Kautilya. It is argued that the latent presence of these principles in present day politics and
primary socialisation due to its affinity with epics like Mahabharata. In Asia many countries like
India are striving for great power status. The contemporary politico-strategic challenges in India
seem to reuse the past as the political activities since 1947 appears to demonstrate, “Kautilyan-
realist learning curve”. Not only India but the manner in which Japan, Germany, US and other
countries are establishing the international relationships depicts the behaviour that aligns with the
concept of Rajamandala theory in the Arthasastra. In this aspect the political intelligence has
remained same (Warner 2014).
On the contrary, the intelligence was also found to change overtime in some other
aspects. The sixth book of Arthashastra deals with the seven factors of a commonwealth, which
act as a source of the circle of kingdom. It is called the saptagna theory (Gautam 2013). The
factors include the country, the minister, the king, the friend, the treasury, and the army. These
factors also make the ideal of a well organised state in present world. This fact is less realised
due to greater emphasis on political theory and thought put forward by Plato and Aristotle. Thus
may have brought the deviation of modern day intelligence from the ancient time. There are
seven constituent elements of the statecraft. However, only four of these elements are used in the
western conception of state. In many western countries the concept of economy is the basis of
state is missing. In Arthasastra, this aspect is considered an important constituent of the state
(Goria 2017). The western discourse on peace finds military security as the precondition. On the
other Indian discourse emphasise on establishing peace without the primacy of military

4ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
hardware. Unlike India, the western thinkers do not consider peace as both means and the end. In
western countries, peace is considered a goal that can be attained by having a high degree of
military self-reliance. The war and conflict in the world is due to this fallacy of belief. Even
Kautilya does not highly focus on the importance of military for state. It gives equal importance
to all the seven constituents, where each one of them is interdependent (Crosston 2016).). The
concept of war among neighbouring countries still exist today which accords to Warner (2014)
may be misinterpretation of theory. It is argued that most people misinterpret this theory as
“considering neighbouring states as enemy and enemy of an enemy as friend” (Shoham and
Liebig 2016). In this aspect it can be argued that the official thinking in India is not influenced
by the Kautilya Arthasastra’s foreign policy theories. However, many countries in west Asia
follow its tenets in a serious fashion.
It appears from the above discussion that intelligence is old as time in many aspects. It
has evolved from the Kautilya Arthasastra. In present world this however differs from the
Arthasastra in many aspects. It can be concluded that the Kautilya’s principles are relevant in
present times just like in ancient times. It continues to be relevant and may remain so in future
generations. However, there is a need of great amount of scholarship because the world is
changing dramatically and it is difficult to establish the relevance to Kautilya’s work in terms of
the present day intelligence completely.
Kautilya has provided a detailed description about the responsibilities and duties of the
king, ministers and the other state officials. Kautilya has also provided a detailed commentary on
the state's political administration. He has explained how the political administration can be
effectively undertaken and managed. He also gave instructions about the defense of the
boundaries of the state, protection of the forts and the ways in which the infiltration of the

5ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
enemies can be handled effectively. The Arthashastra of Kautilya differentiates legal issues into
criminal and civil matters and gives importance over the specific guidelines for administering
justice in terms of evidence, witness and procedures. Moreover, Kautilya strongly preached
dignity. However, he maintained that the penalties must be fair and proportionate to the offence
that has been committed. This principle of Kautilya is relevant even today's scenario because the
need for comprehensive and sound administration for the state has been uplifted by the
propensity of the strong to flout the law and to perform the same repeatedly (Gautam 2013). A
government can only be acknowledged as good if it is administered in a structured manner.
Kautilya suggested that good governance must dodge any kind of extreme decisions and extreme
actions. According to him, soft and the harsh actions must be taken accordingly depending on the
prevailing circumstances. According to him, sovereignty is only practicable when there lays co-
operation with others. He also preached that the administrative measures are required to be taken
only after proper deliberations (Singh 2012; Liebig 2013).
In present case political scenario, enemies are no longer a state actor but a non-state actor
like terrorist so using a spy as stated by Kautilya is a good strategy to ascertain the motive of the
enemies. Kautilya advocated of utilizing women as a weapon of war. He regarded women as
source of sexual satisfaction for the enemies of the troops, participating in the war. According to
him, women are a powerful addiction and a king must use them against an enemy (Prabhu and
Dwivedi 2015). He proposed to use women as a source of assassination and thereby creating
dispute among the enemies. Thus the prospective enemies end up killing each other as a result of
lust against ravishing women. Kautilya also proposed to use women as spy (Vittal 2011).
Women promised pleasure to the king or the higher authorities of the opposing enemies and at
the time of the climax, the enemies would end up revealing their secret game plan to these

6ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
women spies. These spy women then inform the same to the emperor, helping them to combat
the attack of the enemy tactically (Vittal 2011).
This game plan in warfare of using women is relevant in present day scenario as well.
United States and United Kingdom intelligence agencies promote recruitment of female staffs
and target middle-aged women for these jobs. However, the reason behind the use of the women
as a spy in the political warfare has changed its perspective. Now-a-days, in the era of feminism,
women are no longer treated as a symbol of sex or objectified as a symbol of sexual desire. On
contrary women are recruited on the basis of high emotional intelligence and to create work
place diversity (BBC News 2017). They now are provided with more flexible work environment
in order to provide them career support and to encourage more women to join the council of
foreign intelligence (Bhadu and Singh 2012).Kautilya believed that the heredity troops are more
dedicated when comes to patriotism than that of hired troops. In other words, troops consisting of
men born in the same kingdom are claimed to remain loyal to the king. However, this concept of
Kautilya though stands strong on the psychological grounds but fails to stand out in present day
socio-political scenario. Now the countries are separated as developed, developing or third world
countries. With the advancement of the concept of outsourcing, increase in population, need for
cheap labor and increase in the number of detention refuges, the developed countries are now
using the citizens of the third world countries as the soldiers of war fare. For example, more than
100, 00 people of Iraq are working on a contractual basis with the United States Department of
Defense. Two of the most common out sourced militant troops of US is Black water and Armor
group. However, there are reports that these private armies are working as security agents in the
day time and serving as terrorist at night, thus once again proving Kautilya's hypothesis as a true
statement (Sihag 2017).

7ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
A far-sighted visionary that Kautilya was, it is no wonder that his political treatise has
withstood the test of time, and has proved to be crucial and useful in framing the administrative
and military reforms of the present era. It is important to note how the Western thinkers and
sociologists had expressed various views and ideas regarding political administration that had
already been shared by Kautilya in Arthasastra. It should be remembered that Arthasastra spoke
of practical realism, rather than mere political philosophy as spoken by Plato and Aristotle. It
should be noted that although the ‘Prince’ written by Machiavelli is also a remarkable political
treatise, advising a king to follow steps that would help him in perpetuating his rule, Arthasastra
is different as it enlightens one about how to create a sustainable, and productive state. This is
precisely the reason why the ideas expressed in Arthasastra are even relevant today. The German
sociologist Max Weber is always praised for his theory of Bureaucracy, where he propounded
that the key to running an efficient and highly productive state is to create a government
administration system run, controlled and managed by the departments staffed with the non-
elected officials, that will ensure maximum transparency and integrity in action (Malhotra 2014).
Weber believed that organized hierarchies can only ensure the most efficient and rational form of
administration and this systematic process of administration will only help in maintaining order
as well as maximizing efficiency. Since the 18th Century, the international political system has
witnessed a modern form of bureaucracy, whereby the inefficient and unfair practice of tax
farming as was prevalent at earlier times, soon got replaced by an organized method of tax
collection, whereby the Exchequers being enrolled to raise taxes, by exerting control over the
system of tax revenue and government expenditure (Gautam 2013). Further, by the advent of 20th
century, bureaucratic form of administration became highly popular amongst all the nations, with
the public sector of almost all the countries employing over 5% of its workforce for working for

8ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
the government. It is no wonder that some of the greatest critics and theorists of all time, such as
J.S Mill has claimed that most of the successful monarchies of the world were based on the
notion of bureaucracy, and he stated the chef reason behind the success of bureaucracy lies in the
fact that its representatives are chosen solely on the basis of appointment, rather than direct,
unfair election (Smith 2016). However, although the term bureaucracy is a recent one, coined in
the 18th century only, Kautilya had already spoken about the importance of exercising control on
the people of the state, even on the importance of creating a spy-network to keep surveillance
over the whereabouts of the officials, and the ultimate aim behind the same was fair and
transparent administration. Further, it is important to note that Kautilya’s maxims of
administration already included features such as hierarchy, defined competence of each office,
selection and appointment of employees by merit, promotion by seniority-cum-merit,
compensation, training and discipline, which were later being discussed by Weber. However, it
should be remembered at present, many countries are trying to shift focus away from
bureaucratic system of administration, and make their ways towards privatization, as the former
is often being accused of paralysing individual initiative resulting in stagnation, while the latter
allowing sufficient room for progress and improvement (Gautam 2013). Hence, considering the
problem of suppressed creativity, many countries are however moving away from bureaucracy.
However, even today in many countries, bureaucracy is the most acceptable form of public
administration.
Though it is a less acknowledged fact, but the mass surveillance policy of the government
is of indispensible importance in smoothly administering a nation. In order to ensure national
security, and offer protection to the residents of a country from the terrorists, the government of
various countries has also initiated various surveillance programs. For example, only a very few

9ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
days back, the US government was in news for collecting highly confidential data from the
phone logs and Internet data from millions of Americans as part of its mission to keep the United
States safe, and with the advent of technology, the domestic spying technique has already
reached another level. However, it is less known a fact that Kautilya’s Arthasastra had already
spoken about the importance of mass surveillance program, considering it to be a key component
of any efficient administrative system. Kautilya sternly believed that the spies should keep a
close eye on the high officials of the country to examine their loyalty and commitment towards
the government, as well as the citizens of the country to know their reaction towards the abilities
and competence of the administrator. Kautilya believed that this would help the ruler gain
comprehensive knowledge about the functioning of the administrative staffs as well as the
loyalty of the employees working there (Kumar 2016). At present, in order to tighten up the
vigilance system, the government of many countries is not only monitoring the whereabouts of
its people through recording systems, but also monitoring and evaluating the performance of the
government representatives by installing CCTV cameras in office rooms as well as across the
streets. A large number of mass surveillance programs as carried on by the government of
various countries such as BULLRUN (USA), Magic Lantern (USA), GhostNet (China),
Frenchelon (France) make use of advanced technology, including commercial software such as
NarusInsight, that helps in instant identification of the culprits, or flaws in the system, and as a
system is much more time-saving and effective (Tanwar 2014). However, all these government
bodies, while monitoring the internet and telephone communication or supervising staff
performance, are necessarily employing the use of the time-tested statecraft intelligence designed
by Kautilya in his Arthasastra.

10ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
One of the most impressive aspects of Arthasastra is its detailed account of the
importance of effective fiscal management, which alone can ensure the creation of a highly
productive and financially sound nation. At present, the economists believe in increasing the tax
base as it is the only way of creating more assets on the tax rolls (e.g., new or improved business
properties, homes, and rental properties) to spread the cost of operations across more entities
(Murthy and Rooney 2016). There is no gain stating the fact that this will result in more money
to enhance government-funded community features that in turn can add to higher quality of life.
However, this is not a new concept, and such scientifically proven techniques have already been
discussed by Kautilya as he was the first one to advocate that the tax base should be increased,
rather than the tax rate. An efficient and financially sound fiscal management policy was
initiated by Kautilya who deeply believed that the function of a ruler or an administrator is to
collect sufficient taxes to sustain the kingdom, rather than collecting too much tax that end up
overburdening and destroying its people. Further, it is equally important to note here that
Arthasastra was the first book that spoke about the importance of creating distinct tax structures
for people belonging to different financial backgrounds, whereby the wealthy persons should
always pay higher tax than the poorer people (Manrai and Goel 2017). At present, the tax policy
of the government of all the countries is completely based on this idea, whereby the federal tax
rate is based on the income level of the citizen, and exemption is provided to an employee
earning below a certain level.
Unlike former times, when the ruler of a kingdom followed a set of administrative rules
and policies, duly communicated to the ministers, at present a well-written constitution states the
laws of the country, and lays forth the roles and responsibilities of the government and each of its
representatives in serving the nation. Although a well-written Constitution is a unique addition to

11ADMINISTRATIVE INTELLIGENCE
this, it is important that the essential content of the Constitution of most of the countries is
derived from Kautilya’s Arthasastra. First of all, akin to the function of the President in today’s
administration, Kautilya stated that the functions of a king are to act as the military, legislative,
executive and judicial head of the State. At present, most of the economists speak of the
importance of a Welfare State, and yet it is important to note that Kautilya was the first one to
have stated that the king was like the Father and all the people or subjects of his country were his
children. That is how he is supposed to take care of them. Again, it is no less important that the
three important internal issues for the ruler to attend, as mentioned in Arthasastra are: Raksha—
which literally implies the king’s duty to protect life and liberty within his state; Palana that
states the king’s commitment to ensure national law and justice; and, Yogakshema or to ensure
absolute welfare of the people. In today’s world, as absolute monarchy has got replaced by
democracy, these three characteristics are found to be subsumed in the constitutions of all
modern states in the form of preservation of Life, Liberty, Justice, Equality and Property.
Kautilya’s Arthasastra was composed long back in the year of 321 BCE, and yet it has
not lost its relevance, as the oldest and most exhaustive political treatise enlightening the modern
administrators on a variety of issues, right from diplomacy, war and peace, to military statecraft
and political intelligence. As a classical work of political theory, Arthasastra has kept on
shedding light on important military policies and administrative systems that have helped
countries to improve the art of their governance. It is indeed important to state that much of the
scientific management concepts of today’s world is indebted to this book of 15 chapters, 380
Slokas and 4968 Sutras.