Kinderloop Safety: A Business Development and Feasibility Report

This report assesses the feasibility of implementing enhanced safety measures in Kinderloop to ensure the well-being and development of children aged 3-10. It highlights the importance of innovation in business operations, especially in child development, and details the benefits of the proposed safety measures, including emotional and skill development, increased learning capacity, and knowledge enhancement. The report outlines the cost structure, revenue streams (fees, advertisements, B2B partnerships), key resources (technology, safety companies), customer relationships, and customer segments. Success factors such as monitoring development, market research, technology usage, and risk control are also discussed. The analysis concludes that the implementation of these safety measures is feasible and profitable for Kinderloop, contributing to its sustainability by meeting market demands and providing significant benefits.

SAFETY IN
KINDERLOOP

Introduction
 In the recent business operations, it is important for the organizations
to adopt the innovations so that the business can be sustainable in
nature. The failure of the organization in adopting the new ideas will
not enable them to survive in the longer run

Reason of the innovation
 In Australia, it can be seen that the development of the children is an
important aspect that helps the country to grow further (Schonert-
Reichl et al., 2015). The use of right educational functions will help
the children in understanding the values that are present within the
country. The advantages of developing the children in a proper
manner will help them as follows:
 Emotional development
 Skill development
 Increasing the learning capacity
 Developing the knowledge and understanding (Marotz, 2014)

Benefits of the idea
 Help in securing the safety of the children within the organization
 Will monitor the activities of the children in a proper manner so that
the development can be documented properly
 Proper feedback regarding the security system can be provided to the
organization (Khwaja et al., 2014)

Cost structure
 The initial cost for the safety measures needs to be borne by the
clients
 Premium security services will be given at an amount of $100
 The clients can opt for normal services where the children will not be
monitored

Revenue Streams
 The fees that will be taken up from the clients
 The advertisements that will be provided
 The B2B model that will help in promoting the facility in other
organizations (Boyd et al., 2013)

Key Resources and Key Partners
 The technology for the safety measures will be high end so that the
safety measures can be installed properly
 The partners will be the safety companies that will help in installing
the applications within the organization.

Customer Relationships andCustomer Segments
 The company will cater to clients of various age groups. Most
importantly, the children who are aged between 3-10 years will be
admitted in to the organization so that proper development can be
ensured.
 The interaction with the clients can be done in a direct manner, as
they will provide a nominal fee for the first 3 months after the safety
measures have been installed

Success factors
 Monitoring development
 Researching the market
 Technology usage
 Risk control

Feasibility

Conclusion
 The above analysis shows that the installation of the safety measures
will be profitable for Kinderloop, as the success factors of the
organization depends on meeting the requirements. The idea
feasibility is positive and it depends on the demands in the market
along with the benefits. Thus it can be stated that the use of the
safety measures will help the organization to be sustainable.

References
 Boyd, A., Golding, J., Macleod, J., Lawlor, D. A., Fraser, A., Henderson, J., ... & Davey Smith, G. (2013). Cohort
profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.
International journal of epidemiology, 42(1), 111-127.
 Crittenden, P. M. (2013). Raising parents: Attachment, parenting and child safety. Routledge.
 Gordon, R. A., Fujimoto, K., Kaestner, R., Korenman, S., & Abner, K. (2013). An assessment of the validity of the
ECERS-R with implications for measures of child care quality and relations to child development. Developmental
psychology, 49(1), 146.
 Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet
safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of violence, 3(1), 53.
 Khwaja, O. S., Ho, E., Barnes, K. V., O’Leary, H. M., Pereira, L. M., Finkelstein, Y., ... & Khatwa, U. (2014). Safety,
pharmacokinetics, and preliminary assessment of efficacy of mecasermin (recombinant human IGF-1) for the
treatment of Rett syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4596-4601.
 Marotz, L. R. (2014). Health, safety, and nutrition for the young child. Nelson Education.
 Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F., & Diamond, A. (2015).
Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school
program for elementary school children: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental psychology, 51(1), 52.
 Singh, A., Park, A., & Dercon, S. (2013). School meals as a safety net: an evaluation of the midday meal scheme in
India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62(2), 275-306.