This case study delves into the ethical responsibilities of a lawyer, Jarndyce, in a scenario involving a client, Estella, with whom he has a complex personal relationship. Estella, a blogger, faces a defamation case, and the analysis explores whether Jarndyce should represent her, considering potential conflicts of interest and adherence to the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015. The case highlights issues of professional duty, confidentiality, and the lawyer's obligation to act in the best interests of the client, while maintaining ethical boundaries. The study examines Jarndyce's actions, including his initial reluctance to take the case and his subsequent behavior influenced by personal factors, to determine if he is fulfilling his professional obligations. The analysis references relevant legal principles and the importance of maintaining professional conduct and avoiding any actions that could compromise the lawyer-client relationship.