Leadership, Ethics, and Environmental Impact: A Case Study Analysis

Verified

Added on  2020/04/29

|4
|1129
|78
Case Study
AI Summary
This document presents a detailed analysis of three case studies focusing on ethical leadership and management practices. Case Study 1 explores conflicts of interest among stakeholders concerning an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), examining ethical behaviors, favorable data interpretations, individual responsibilities, and environmental protection through ethical conduct. Case Study 2 addresses ethical dilemmas related to chemical waste management, evaluating the ethical implications of actions involving leaking drums and the responsibilities of individuals in such situations. Case Study 3 focuses on effective public speaking approaches, presentation preparation steps, techniques for audience engagement, and the strengths of a presenter in managing disruptions, offering insights into adapting presentation styles for different audiences. The document analyzes ethical considerations, decision-making processes, and the importance of responsible leadership in various scenarios.
Document Page
Case Study 1
a. Highlight conflict among the stakeholders from a group and individual perspective
On the case study conflict of interest can be observed escalating between the different stakeholders
whereby John questions the authenticity of the EIS report and claims the benefits have been
exaggerated while the environmental impacts have been underestimated. He goes on to question all
project engineers as a unit whereas Bill Rourke responds by defending the project engineering. This is
observed where he mentioned heir is no Prima Facia that can case launched on any of the project
engineers and stakeholders and why the north side council has not assembled a case against the
responsible individuals.
b. What is ethical behaviour in this situation?
The ethical behaviour in this situation is failing to highlight the factual environmental impact and its
effects and focusing only on the benefits to the Sydney residents. It also in breach of professional ethics
where results and finding related to the environmental impact statement have not been properly
represented by the engineers
c. Does a favourable interpretation of Data translate an unethical Conduct?
Yes, it does as it helps highlight the engineers focus towards securing project approval from the local
government by failing to focus on environmental impact statement and reports. The reports go
undisputed due to the council having placed full faith on the engineers to deliver an accurate result but
the engineers have demonstrated unethical practice by using their power and authority to manipulate
the finding in their favour.
d. Is it fair to single out an individual who is doing a job?
Job an ethic is not limited to an organization and every individual staff member must also be able to
raise their concern regarding the bad practice and failure to implement or address the true finding. This
makes it important to also include staff to a disciplinary hearing as they also have a responsibility to
highlight the issues identified.
e. Can the environment be protected by ethical conduct?
Yes, in fact, the environment can only be protected by ethical conduct where each individual must take
responsibility for the environmental wellbeing. This is critical as the environment is helpless and having
the public, professionals, and organization acting ethically towards maintaining environmental
guidelines will surely safeguard the environment.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Case Study 2 –
Question 1
a. What is the ethical behaviour in this situation?
The ethical behaviour would be to prevent Tom from returning the leaking drums back to residential and
densely populated areas this would place people’s health in danger. The rule clearly states not to bring
chemical waste to the residential or highly populated areas this can affect resident’s health and must be
abided to prevent causing a health concern.
b. What should scot do at this point?
Scott is ethically correct by highlighting it is against the law and should not be done he should emphasis
on having the leaking drums repairs on site and in the same ware house.
c. Do they choose a proposed course of Action?
No! They do not choose a proper course of action as y transporting the leaking drums they risk
damaging the environment and also play residents and other public in danger of exposure to the
chemical waste.
Questions 2
a. Is Scott’s assistant classified as unethical?
Yes, this is considered as unethical as he has followed ad help save single individual money rather than
consider the worst case scenario which could have exposed a large number of people to chemical waste
exposure and poisoning the environment.
b. Do they choose the right course of Action?
No, they do not choose the right course of action as they have failed to consider the public’s interest
and placed a large number of people and the environment in danger of exposure to the chemical waste.
c. Action to be taken on Tom and Scot
It is important that both Tom and Scott be held responsible for breaching chemical waste management
laws and the full force of the law imposed on their action to help set an example to other officers and
professionals who may be practicing the same. Only by setting an example can reforms be implemented
thus they must be held responsible for breaching the laws and punished for the same to the highest
degree.
Document Page
Case Study 3
Question 1
a. What speaking approach would you appreciate?
It is important to adopt the universal approach while addressing the public as this allows the individual
reach out to the public and demonstrate their understanding related to the given topic. In-depth
research on the topic must be done to allow the individual will the listener’s confidence but it’s also
important to retain strictness with regard to concerns which may not have been met. Sticking a balance
will allow the speaker retain the audience’s attention.
b. Steps linked to preparing a presentation
Step 1 – analysis and understand the audiences need
Step 2 – Topic Selection – select a topic or concern of public interest
Step 3 - outline the presentations objective
Step 4 – Introduce the topic to the audience
Step 5 - Deliver the presentations main points of concern
Step 6 – conclude the Presentation
c. Techniques used to captivate the audience
To help improve the audience’s attention towards the topic it’s important to provide clearly visible and
understandable images, graphs and other media which can assist the audience to correlate the
information to real-life situations.
Question 2
a. Melanie’s strengths
Some important strength exhibited by Melanin includes her ability to maintain a stable and focus mind
despite the audience and colleagues attempting to disrupt the speech. She retained a calms mind and
noted her present speech point and would continue after the disturbance was cleared. She had also
prepared in advance and handed out a plan to be implemented by the team after the meeting
demonstrating control and ability to plan ahead of the presentation.
b. Presenting to the chamber of commerce.
Document Page
Melanie’s was noticeable quite an would wait for the disruption to diffuse before continuing with the
presentation but in a situation where she needs to present to the chamber of commerce she would
need to adopt a more aggressive and controlling position by also managing the audience to ensure they
are not disrupting the proceeding thus demonstrating her leadership and managerial skills.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]