Leadership Theories: Evolution, Models, and Organizational Impact

This report provides a comprehensive overview of various leadership theories, tracing their evolution from early concepts like the "Great Man" theory and trait theory to behavioral, situational, and transformational approaches. It explores the contributions of key figures like Max Weber and the development of models such as the University of Michigan and Ohio State studies, as well as Blake and Mouton's managerial grid. The report delves into the contingency theories, including Hersey-Blanchard's situational leadership and the path-goal theory, emphasizing the importance of adapting leadership styles to different situations and follower readiness. Furthermore, it examines transformational and transactional leadership, highlighting the characteristics of transformational leaders and their impact on organizational sustainability, motivation, and employee development. The report concludes by emphasizing the significance of effective leadership practices and the need for novel techniques to foster organizational success.

Theories of leadership

Running Head: Report
Contents
Contents......................................................................................................................................1
Introduction ...............................................................................................................................2
Literature review........................................................................................................................2
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................8
References..................................................................................................................................9
1

Running Head: Report
Introduction
There is a lot of writing on effective leadership; the field has scores of explicit streams, for
example, basic leadership, pioneer adherent association, the intensity of the pioneer, and a lot
more that have made significant commitments to our comprehension (Cacioppe, 2009). This
paper will discuss the evolution of leadership and how it is helping the organizations to
develop and arrange the vital operations. Effective leadership helps in reducing the level of
conflicts in the organization and it motivates the workers to give their best for the
organization.
Literature review
In this paper, a brief introduction to the history of the leadership will be depicted for the
hypothesis and research. The logical investigation of effective leadership was introduced by
the father of human science i.e. Max Weber (1864-1920). He set the inquiries of power,
status, and authenticity with regards to religion, legislative issues, and defense. Committing
incredible regard for the uncertain pressure among pioneers and organizations, he developed
a relentless pattern toward justification in each circle of society that made the job of pioneers
both increasingly dangerous and progressively significant (Uzohue, Yaya, & Akintayo,
2015).
“Great Man” thesis; it depicts that there are very few uncommon people, in public who could
shape history. Notwithstanding, studies show that it is a useful task, it is viably obvious and
along these lines unusable (Wart, 2013).
Trait theory; depicts to be focused on attempting to recognize the characteristics that discuss
non-pioneers as compared to pioneers. Does it tell about concentrating on "what" a powerful
2

Running Head: Report
pioneer is? It is not focused on "how" to viable lead. It is observed in the study that specific
physical, social, and individual attributes are natural (Judge & Piccolo, 2014). All the
scholars inspected the characteristics of extraordinary pioneers and clarified authority by the
inner characteristics.
Identity, physical, and mental qualities were analyzed depending on the carrier development
of the leader and how he helps others to come up and execute. Though much research was
done to distinguish the characteristics, no answer was found as to what qualities reliably were
related to incredible administration. One blemish with this line of thought was in overlooking
the situational and natural factors that assume a job in a pioneer's dimension of adequacy
(Avolio & Walumbwa, 2009). Besides, attribute hypothesis sets key characteristics for
effective authority (drive, honesty, fearlessness, want to lead, insight, and employment)
however it does not present the idea with respect to attributes. These are also associated with
people or could the instruction works on them. No two chiefs are similar, and no pioneer has
the majority of the attributes.
In Behavioural theory; earlier, development was a progressively engaged look for the premise
of pioneers. Social scholars recognized determinants of the initiative so individuals could be
prepared to be pioneers Examiners made character tests and differentiated the results against
pioneers. In the 1940s, this concept was taken to study for a long period of time. This
technique had two issues: First, the once-overs ended up being longer and longer when
looking into proceeded; second, the characteristics and traits separated were not mind-
blowing pointers across over conditions (Day & Zaccaro, 2014).
This second noteworthy push, which looked works on attempting to make sense of what
productive pioneers do, not what they resemble other individuals, began to look at pioneers in
3

Running Head: Report
the operations. That is, in the affiliation, they work in, by perceiving rehearses pioneers
demonstrate that development is for the performance of the association. The latest study
depicted that it is vital to change chiefs’ drive rehearses and acknowledge that the best styles
of power could be instructed. The University of Michigan and Ohio State activity
examinations received this methodology in Ohio State and the University of Michigan (Dinh,
Lord, & Liden, 2014). The accompanying critical push was to look at the situational settings
that impact boss in order to find significant models for speculation building and important
admonishment. A leading boss among the studies of the attributes pioneers is stated that an
individual does not transform into a pioneer by moderation of the responsibility for a mix of
characteristics, yet that the case of individual properties of the pioneer must bear some strong
relationship to the qualities, activities, and goals of the supporters (Wart, 2013).
(Early, 2017) In this paper, essential leadership models began by testing 1,800 explanations.
That was identified with different conducts of leadership. By ceaselessly refining the
practices, it examines two hidden components; idea and commencement of structure. In this
context, the idea depicts an assortment of practices identified with characterizing jobs. It must
also have internal and outer control systems, teams, and work coordination. During the
1960s, comparative examinations generated a sense of help if regularly short-sighted.
These two essential components that the study has recognized was about the thought of
structure, that achieved inquire about comparative discoveries. The purpose of this work was
to cut short the idea for the administration and it was only in conceived characteristic, yet
rather powerful initiative tactics and planning could be discussed and trained to
representatives. These analysts at this period of time were gaining reorganization. It separated
4

Running Head: Report
pioneers and it was assumed that it could be instructed. Furthering this work, Blake and
Mouton additionally built up a two-factor model of administration conduct like that found at
the University of Michigan. They called the components "worry for individuals" and "worry
for yield." They later included a third factor, that of adaptability. As indicated by these
examinations, leaders show practices that fall into the two essential classes: errand or
individuals. Contingent upon which class was indicated most of the time, a pioneer could be
set along the two continua. The result of this examination was principally expressive and
classified pioneers dependent on their conduct (Alkahtani, 2016).
Another way to deal with pioneer conduct concentrated on recognizing the best styles of
leadership. Work at the University of Iowa distinguished vote based (cooperation and
designation), absolutist (directing and brought together) and free enterprise styles (bunch
opportunity in basic leadership). These examine discoveries were uncertain in leader
connection (Alkahtani, 2016). Fruitful pioneers must almost certainly recognize pieces of
information in a domain and adjust their conduct to address the issues of their supporters and
of the specific circumstance. Indeed, even with great demonstrative aptitudes, pioneers may
not be viable except if they easily could manage their administration style. It will help to
fulfill the needs of their condition. The pioneer collaboration approach manages the
possibility of the connection between the pioneer's qualities, the pioneer's practices, and the
circumstance in which the pioneer exists. These possibility speculations make the supposition
that the impacts of one variable on authority are dependent upon different factors.
This idea was a noteworthy understanding at the time since it opened the entryway for the
likelihood that administration could be distinctive in each circumstance. With this thought a
5

Running Head: Report
progressively reasonable perspective on authority rose, taking into consideration of the
intricacy and situational explicitness of general viability. A few unique possibilities were
distinguished and examined, yet it is impossible to expect that any particular hypothesis is
substantial or helpful than another. Contingency speculations situational favourability is the
possibility where the hypothesis depicts and thinks about two factors related to the
organizational pioneer adequacy. It depicts the administration style and its impact.
The Hersey-Blanchard situational initiative hypothesis depends on the measure of course and
it also measures socio-enthusiastic. It helps in relationship conduct with a pioneer at a given
circumstance and the dimension of the development of the supporters. The pioneer errand and
relationship conduct is dictated by the dimension of supporter status. As the dimension of
adherent status changes, the measure of pioneer assignment conduct should overall alter to
coordinate the dimension of preparation (Cairns & Hollenback, 2008). Hersey and Blanchard
contended that there could be the best demeanors for administrators yet that there was no best
style of leadership. For instance, all chiefs ought to be worried about profitability and
individuals that concerned frame of mind can be effectively implemented. It could be done in
different styles, which depends on various circumstances.
Four administration components which could be called quadrants are "telling," "taking an
interest," "appointing" and "selling," are the part of this concept. The Path-Goal possibility
hypothesis manages an investigation of the population and all of them are controlled and
coordinated by pioneers. The significance of the adherents in initiative rose, and
administration was viewed as an association between the objectives of the supporters and the
pioneer (Kovach, 2018). The pioneers in an organization are basically in-charge, those create
practices. It helps and empowers for Transformational and value-based authority. Until 1978,
the focal point of the standard writing was initiative at lower levels, which was manageable
for a small gathering, exploratory strategies, and improved variable models. Official initiative
6

Running Head: Report
and the more indistinct capacities to incite sensational change were generally disregarded.
James Bums' book on the initiative, entitled Leadership, drastically changed that enthusiasm
by presenting the idea that value-based administration. It was being considered, and taken as
a very significant field - transformational authority – was being overlooked to a great extent
(Fairholm, 2011).
Another case of the initial hypothesis is Bass' Transformational and Transactional
administration model. Transformational and value-based authority begins in the circle of
political investigation; Bass took these ideas and connected them all the more for the most
part to manager subordinate relations (Toban & Sjahruddin, 2016). Bass finds that value-
based pioneers have an expense benefit in the introduction towards authority whereby they
focus on compensating exertion properly and guaranteeing that conduct fits in with desires.
All the while, they focus on trade-off, interest, and control. Whilst value-based authority is
probably going to be preservationist, the transformational initiative is either progressive or
reactionary. Transformational pioneers are magnetic, moving, visionary, mentally animating
and obliging of individual needs. They urge adherents to discover novel answers for issues
and representative, mentor, exhort and give input. The viability of transformational authority
is all around archived (Sternberg, 2013). The transformational authority approach offers a
standout amongst the best manners by which a supervisor can limit issues. Pioneers utilizing
this human asset-based framework that endeavor to move supporters through structure energy
and trust. Pioneers depict a dream of self-assurance, fearlessness, and confidence. Every
single worker is esteemed as an individual (Manz & Sims, 2013).
7

Running Head: Report
Authors proposed that the best heads have been formed by an extreme transformational
experience. They saw two gatherings of fruitful pioneers; they were, for the most part,
centered on professions and they had legends and good examples. Nerds need to change the
world and look for harmony between vocations, family and individual exercises. They have
fewer legends (Bennis & Thomas, 2012).
Conclusion
For the long run sustainability, effective leadership practices are a must. For that many novel
techniques and tactics are required to frame the arrangements. Motivation and encouragement
must be boosted by the leaders of the company so that the workers could work more
efficiently.
8

Running Head: Report
References
Alkahtani, A. (2016). The Influence of Leadership Styles on Organizational Commitment:
The Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence. Business and Management Studies,
2(1), 1-12. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ab4/6df2d8cb8194dd288783f98fe3e0e9ecdfe3.pdf
Avolio, B., & Walumbwa, F. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, andFuture
Directions. pp. 1-30. Retrieved from
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1036&context=managementfacpub
Bennis, W., & Thomas, R. (2012). Crucibles of Leadership. 80(9), pp. 39-45. Retrieved from
https://www.effectuation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Entrepreneurship-Theory-
1.pdf
Cacioppe, R. (2009). Leadership moment by moment! Leadership & Organization
Development Journal, 18(7), 335-345. Retrieved from
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/01437739710190648
Cairns, T., & Hollenback, J. (2008). Technical note: a study of Hersey and Blanchard’s
situational leadership theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,
19(2), 113-116. Retrieved from
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/01437739810208692
Chepurenko, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship Theory: New Challenges and Future Prospects.
Retrieved from https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2015/07/03/1082518448/04-
Chepurenko.pdf
9

Running Head: Report
Day, D., & Zaccaro, S. (2014). Leadership: A Critical Historical Analysis of the Influence of
Leader Traits. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254661228_Leadership_A_Critical_Historic
al_Analysis_of_the_Influence_of_Leader_Traits
Dinh, J., Lord, F., & Liden, R. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new
millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership
Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984313001203
Early, G. (2017). A short history of leadership theories. Retrieved from
https://leadersquest.org/content/documents/A_short_history_of_leadership_theories.p
df
Fairholm, M. (2011). The Themes and Theory of Leadership: James MacGregor Burns and
the Philosophy of Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.strategies-for-managing-
change.com/support-files/burnstransformationalleadership.pdf
Judge, T., & Piccolo, R. (2014). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-
Analytic Test ofTheir Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–
768. Retrieved from http://www.panglossinc.com/TA-TF%20Paper--JAP
%20published.pdf
Kovach, M. (2018). An Examination of Leadership Theories in Businessand Sport
Achievement Contexts. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 11(2), 1-17.
Retrieved from https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1215&context=jvbl
10

Running Head: Report
Kumar, K. (2015, May 27). Leslie Wilson, Reece Australia’s Boss And Forbes Billionaire .
Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com.au/leslie-wilson-reece-australias-boss-forbes-
billionaire-1449860
Manz, C., & Sims, H. (2013). SuperLeadership: Beyod the Myth of Heroic Leadership.
Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bbc6/8829286adc534769ad61e454dda2f0330746.pdf
Sternberg, R. (2013). WICS: A Model of Leadership in Organizations. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 2(4), 386-401. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dfde/11b7f6b7e0cabb3c07301c26d8a5e9bf299d.pdf
Toban, C., & Sjahruddin, H. (2016). The Antecedent and Consequence of Organizational
Commitment and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Public Administration,
4(2), 26-33. Retrieved from http://www.sciepub.com/reference/151303
Uzohue, C., Yaya, J., & Akintayo, O. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles,
Styles and their Relevance to Management of Health Science Libraries in Nigeria.
Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, 1(1), 17-26. Retrieved from
http://archive.wilsonquarterly.com/sites/default/files/articles/WQ_VOL18_SP_1994_
Article_02_3.pdf
Wart, M. (2013). Public‐Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment. 63(2), pp. 214-228.
Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-6210.00281
11