Leadership Theories Application to Bill Gates of Microsoft: A Case

This case study explores the application of leadership theories to Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, analyzing his leadership style and its impact on the company's success. It examines how Gates utilized a blend of leadership theories, including participative leadership, to drive Microsoft's growth and market dominance. The study highlights Gates' ability to foster hard work, enthusiasm, and employee involvement in decision-making, contributing to the company's long-term stability and economic appreciation. The case study also acknowledges the challenges faced by Microsoft and attributes the company's resilience to Gates' leadership approach, which emphasizes continuous learning, adaptability, and the cultivation of a motivated and engaged workforce.

Application of Leadership Theories 1
APPLICATION OF LEADERSHIP THEORIES TO A LEADER IN AN ORGANIZATION: A
CASE STUDY OF BILL GATES
Name
Institution
City/State
Professor
Date
1

Application of Leadership Theories 2
Introduction
Leadership is the ability to lead a group of people in an organization or a society. Different
authors have given different definitions for the term leadership. According to Summerfield
(2014), some authors define leadership by what the leaders do while other focus on what
leadership is as a terminology. Among the definitions used by different authors include taking
people to places they have never been before. Some also use the term leader to bring out the
meaning of leadership. For instance, leaders rally people towards a better future. While the
definitions vary from one author to the other, all of them agree that on three basic parts of the
leadership concept. First that there must be an individual who is referred to as a leader, secondly,
that there must be a group of people or an organization that the leader is charged with the
responsibility of giving direction and lastly, that there must be a common goal for which the
leader steers the people they lead to achieve. The primary purpose of leadership is to produce
useful charge especially non- incremental charge (Summerfield 2014, p.257). Leadership
theories, on the other hand, are a system of ideologies that aim at explaining how leadership
works and the types of techniques that are applied in leadership. Due to the evolution of
organizations ’structures and change in time. The theories used for leadership styles and
techniques have changed over time. According to Offerman (2018), the past twenty years have
witnessed various changes in the leadership theories. The Author considers some of the changes
as naïve. However, we cannot write the theories off including those that Offerman (2018) refer to
as naïve. Some of the existing leadership theories include the great man (trait) theory, trait
theory, behavioral theory, participative leadership theory, situational leadership theory,
contingency theories, transactional leadership theory and transformational leadership theory each
of these theories look at leadership from a different and unique perspective.
2

Application of Leadership Theories 3
Organizations are entities comprising of multiple people driven by a common purpose such as
business or government departments (Cornwell, Howard-Grenville and Hampel 2018, p 772).
Organization structures require that there exist one person who acts as the leader of the
organization. Today very many successful organizations attribute their success to the leadership
style of their leaders. The leaders of these organization work on identified leadership framework
supported by a number of the leadership theories. While the different theories poi not too
different concepts on leadership, come of them are not applicable as standalone theories. They
need the support of the application of other theories to enable successful leadership. Some of the
globally successful organizations include Apple, Google, Amazon, Coca-cola and Microsoft
companies. This paper amylases the application of leadership and management theories today
with a focus on Bill Gates of Microsoft Company (Granshaw 2014, p. 77).
Bill Gates and Microsoft Company
Bill Gates is not only a business leader but also a philanthropist and a technologist. The founder
of technology giant was born and raised in Washington in a supporting family that gave him the
necessary support to pursue his love and desire to work with a computer. At 13 years old the
businessman was first introduced to computers in his Lakeside School where he learned
programming at a basic level (Lyons 2010, p. 21). The skills he gained enabled him to develop a
simple game known as “tic-tac-toe.” He later made arrangements to work with Computer Center
Corporation so that he could spend more time with computes of the organization. His main aim
during the time he worked for the company was to learn source code which included Lisp and
Fortran Machine code. He later enrolled at Harvard University to study Mathematics and
computer science (Kupfer and Gates 1996, p.103). The interest he has for pursuing his coding
saw him drop out of college to start his own company. In the Year 1976, the Microsoft Company
3

Application of Leadership Theories 4
was officially founded, and one of the first contracts that the company ever signed was with
Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems and involved the development of the simple
operating system. At the initial stages of the company, Bill would pack and send off orders as
part of his engagement in the Microsoft business. Other than that, he would also strive to review
every line of code. The turning point for the Microsoft Company was in the year 1980 when the
IBM, a leading PC manufacturer approached the company for new basic operating systems for
their computers (Stone 2002, p.37). Even though the company has tapped the attention of the
leading PC produce, other PC clones also started emerging, and Microsoft had to work had to
sell the software to them. Through these efforts, the company was able to attain market
dominance as most of the clones now come with Microsoft’s software as a default part of the
PCs. The 1990 Microsoft release become the best seller which replaced graphics interfaces and
text interfaces (Stone 2001,p. 1). Another version of Windows was released in the year 1995, and
it becomes the backbone of all another version of Windows including Windows 2000, Vista and
XP (Microsoft Corporation 2017, p.21). Thought the time Bill Gates has worked with Microsoft,
he has been able to diversify the software to ensure market domination. For instance, Internet
Explorer browser comes pre-installed in the computers to make sure that it commands and
reasonable percentage of the market share. However, the company has been battled out of the
game when it comes to search engines by Google.
The foundation and growth of Microsoft Company had taken the determination and leadership of
Bill Gates starting for the foundation when he dropped out of college to start his own company to
the first contract that the company ever signed. The company has grown to a world tech giant
over the years creating employment opportunities to some people all over the world. By the year
2018, Microsoft Company had an approximate of 141,000 employees all over the world. The
4

Application of Leadership Theories 5
company’s net worth in 2018 was recorded at $100 billion while Bill’s net worth was estimated
at $90 billion (Microsoft Corporation 2017, p.21). For Bill Gates to achieve this, he had to use
more than one leadership style in running the company. While the most outstanding leadership
style that is easily pointed out in Bills leadership is Authoritarian, he has to mix the style with of
their styles of leadership to propel his company to greater heights. Some authors have given the
various description of Bill’s business leadership style. Some of the attributes that have been
pointed out by other authors include, thinking big, putting passion, staying focus, following long-
term approach, simulating creativity and intellect, caring about other people and considering
learning as a continuous process that only ends only at death.
Application of Leadership theories
For Microsoft to come up, stabilize and become a world business giant, the CEO had to employ a
mix of leadership theories and styles. While Bill Gates developed his theories of leadership, he
still managed to intertwine his leadership theories and other leadership theories that already
existed and these that were developed by scholars and business leaders elsewhere (Chakravartula
2017, p 145). In the study of the Bill Gates approach of business leadership, the following
leadership theories application is acknowledged.
Participative Leadership theory
Participative leadership is leadership that involves all the members of the team in developing
strategies and procedures of attaining the goals of the organization.
While most corporate organizations do not embrace the democratic approach of participative
leadership, some find the autocratic participative leadership as a way of involving the employees
5

Application of Leadership Theories 6
and staff in decision making. The autocratic participative leadership dictates that the leader
should allow the workers or the team to brainstorm on ideas and generate as many ideas as
possible (Chakravartula 2017, p.102). However, it is the leader who makes the final decision.
The decision is then communicated to the rest of the team. While both Democratic and autocratic
types of participative leadership approach are founded on the participation of the employees and
the team, autocratic participative leadership approach is more goals oriented and works best
when the team has deadlines to meet (Huang 2012, p.127). Bill Gates makes use of this rare
character in making some decisions on management of the company, and some timed on the new
products of the company. The CEO of Microsoft Company puts faith in his employees and has
value for the contribution that employees make for the overall prosperity of the company. In the
past, participative leadership was considered controversial. The practice of the leadership style
was not widespread among business and organization leaders. However, with time, and with the
changes in consumer behavior a wide range of products and service industries, corporate leaders
began to embrace the participative leadership style to the fine solution to the organizations and
business problems and to improve delivery to customer’s expectations (Dootson 2016, p.37).
Currently, participatory leadership style has become one of the most admired and most applied
among corporate and organization leaders today.
The experiments conducted by Henry. A. Landsbergis in the 1950s of the impact of participatory
leadership in employee performance found out that the productively of the employee improved
with the introduction of participative leadership styles (Van Wart 2013, p.561). The employees
are motivated when they know that they are part of the decisions made in the organization and
that their input has value in the determination of the outcome of the company’s services or
products. Organizations that practice participative leadership style have their employees deliver
6

Application of Leadership Theories 7
even in the absence of the leaders. Furthermore, the workers tend to be more committed to
achieving the organization’s goals and have constant group morale. Even though Microsoft is
one of the largest companies that exist in the world today, it does not mean that they don’t have
their share of problems. However, it is clear that the company has stood the test of time and that
is majorly attributed to the leadership style of the Bill Gates. The CEO has cultivated the attitude
of hard work and enthusiasm to succeed among the team members. The company was founded
on the fundamental principles that propel it even today (Schlender and Ballen 1995, p 35). Bill
Gates was so determined to start his own company that he could not Waite to finish his college
education. The self-motivation that he had when he founded the organization is the self-
motivation that he cultivates in his employees today through participative leadership. The leader
of Microsoft comprehends the need of involving his team members in key decision-making
processes in the business. He also understands that businesses have fluctuations and changes that
a corporate leader has to adapt to have a successful business.
The participative leadership style has been instrumental for the CEO as he does no find a hard
time delegating tasks either (Jones 2007, p.175). When the employees believe in the objective
they want to achieve and strive towards achieving them; it becomes easy to delegate tasks as the
duties will be handled adequately with or without the presence of the leader. The leadership style
ensures that the employees own the company and its objective creating room only for minimal
supervision and monitoring. The leader can have confidence in the employees to do the right
thing if not all the time then most of the times. Bill Gates has perfected in the practice of
participatory leadership and the practice, in combination with other leadership style has seen him
develop his company over the years through economic appreciations and depreciation (Boje and
Smith 2010, p. 351). The worth of the company keeps rising year in year out as the giant tech
7

Application of Leadership Theories 8
company maintains its dominance of the computer software provision and as the number of
people who own personal computers increases all over the world as time goes. It is vital to note
that participative leadership is not a standalone means to achieve success in a business or
organization. It has to get support from other leadership styles to bridge the gap the gaps that
may exist when dealing with different types of employees and team members.
Trait Leadership theory
This theory was majorly developed with the aim of finding out the main distinctive personalities
of leaders that lead to the success of any organization. The theory puts a lot of emphasis on
qualities and characteristics that leaders should have. The reason behind the development of this
theory was to help find and recruit the right set of individuals to be appointed into the leadership
positions of the organizations. According to this theory, leadership qualities arise from the
combined influence of various traits (Oliveira et al. 2016.p.23). This involves the integration of
social abilities, cognitive abilities and the tendencies of dispositions; it should be noted that these
traits do influence each other simultaneously.
8

Application of Leadership Theories 9
Even though traits such as cooperation, dependency, assertiveness adaptability and decisiveness
have been pointed out as part of the characteristics of leaders, there is no quantifiable technique
of identifying the leadership characteristics. This means therefore that there aren’t any consistent
set of attributes which may give a full explanation of true leadership.
To some extent, all prominent and gifted leaders in the world may possess a few similar
attributes nevertheless; it is a tall order for all leaders to have common sets of personalities. This,
therefore, means that the trait theory is incapable of supporting its momentum. The position of a
leader is not only influenced by traits, but there are also other factors to be considered (Oliveira
et al. 2016.p.23).
To become common knowledge among people that you cannot change somebody’s attributes
over a short timeline. According to Lewis (2018), it is believed that attributes of leaders don’t
have to change necessarily during harsh times as stated in theory. With this in mind, it has been
concluded that trait theory is simplistic and thus does not fully give account on leadership. It
only concerns itself with what people think about their leaders thus having law clarifications on
personal attributes and inappropriate prediction power over their job performance.
Despite its setbacks, trait theory of leadership has enabled contemporary entrepreneurs to adopt
strategies that they can use in identifying upcoming leaders. Most of these departments do use
personality traits to choose their prospective leaders. Individuals who are diligent, thoughtful and
extraversion are best fit for leadership positions. In this case, this theory should also be
considered as a selection tool. Bill Gates seems to understand the importance of this theory in
business. However, the approach is not limited to business corporations only but applicable to
9

Application of Leadership Theories 10
government and non-governmental organizations as well. There are particular traits that the CEO
of Microsoft Company looks at in his employees and business leaders who steer help him steer
toward achievement of the corporate goals. The attributes help on the allocation of duties and
areas of delegation. It is vital to know the habits and skill of your employees as a leader so that
you can know what to expect from them interim of delivery of assigned duties. Some of the traits
that the CEO focuses on include; adaptability adapt to various situations, assertiveness, level of
energy, ability or inability to corporate with others, level of self-confidence, diplomatic and
creative. The leader might also get interested in the conceptual skills, tolerance to stress,
dependability, willingness to take responsibility and fluency in speaking of the employees.
The character traits of the employees determine their ability to work under certain environments
(Suder 2005, p.147). It is essential that the leader knows the character traits of his employees or
followers to guide them in giving their best to the Corse of the company. The leadership concept
of trait theory has helped the CEO choose the kind of environment to subject-specific employees
to ensure that they give their best. The Microsoft Company has some employees distributed all
over the world as it is vital for the leadership to provide that the employees can deliver their best
in the environment in which they are at the moment. This means that an evaluation of the traits
of every employee is essential for the company to determine the roles that they play in attaining
the objective of the company.
Situational and Contingency theories
It should be noted that there are no particular theories that fully satisfies itself or is best in every
circumstance. To come up with practical and successful leaders, leaders ought to adapt to diverse
styles of leadership depending on the objectives, situations and the nature of the stock of
10

Application of Leadership Theories 11
competence. According to this theory, leaders ought to have more cognitive and psychomotor
abilities so that they can adapt and implement diverse leadership techniques (Burris et al.,
2013.p.9).
Due to globalization and continuously changing the environment of work, it, therefore, follows
that the styles of leadership also have to be flexible at every point and conform so that it can be
able to deal with the issues facing the organization it is operating for. This theory and model
which was developed by Fielder was formulated so that it could address the problems of the
workplace. This theory further tries to show that leaders become more active when their traits are
adequately matched with the right situation. This theory is based on three situational factors, i.e.,
leader-member relations, task structure, and position power. This involves developing a high
degree of confidence, trust, and loyalty while task structure entails the number of alternative
solutions and options. This theory allows the leader to manipulate the prevailing circumstances
to become successful (Schyns 2011. 59).
The Adair’s Action model characterizes leadership in three circle diagram. This elements, i.e.,
contingent and situational elements determine the responsiveness of the leader on how he/she
will address the issues of the organization to achieve its objectives.
This theory has also been subjected to a lot of criticism. There is no flexibility in it. The theory
tries to assert that flexible leaders may cause chaos to the organization and thus should be
changed. The LPC scale has only 50% reliable variance thus it I, not that reliable to be used as a
tool of measuring leaders’ capacities thus bringing unpleasant environment and confusion. Bill
Gates has used this theory right since the beginning of the company. He made decisions to start
the company based on the situation he was in at the moment. He had the desire to start his own
11

Application of Leadership Theories 12
company, and he also had the skills to start the company. Based on these circumstances he made
up his mind to start his company.
Furthermore in the early stages of the development of Microsoft, when PC clones production had
started spreading out, the CEO had to make decisions to aim at supplying all the clones with the
company’s software (The Forbes 4001998, p.302). As much as that was a market opportunity for
the company, production of PC clones was not expected. However, Bill Gates made a decision
based on the market situation at that time, and the decisions gave the company a great market
share regarding the supply of computer software. As the computer market got comparative, the
CEO had to make arrangements to maintain the company’s market dominance. It is for this
reason that the company chose to diversify to maintain market dominance in the wake of
technological advancement (Suder 2005, P.146). To a great extent, Microsoft has succeeded with
this in exception of search engines where Google successfully specialized. Furthermore, the CEO
has to constantly make more decisions based on both the internal and external environment of
the company. There may be some external factors such as changes in government regulations
and the invention of more sophisticated PCs which the company has to keep in check and adjust
to comply with.
Behavioral theory
This theory is based on the specific behavior of leaders. It thus assumes that the behavior of
leaders can be used to assess whether they can be influential or not (Larsson, 2017,p. 59). This
will further show if either they will become successful or not. The behavioral theory was
developed due to high criticism of trait theory. This theory tries to assert the fact that the
qualities of leadership are not necessarily born inside an individual but can be learned (Oliveira
12

Application of Leadership Theories 13
et al., 2016 .p.7). From comprehensive research on behavioral theory, four leadership behaviors
were developed namely; concerned task oriented empowerment of people and development,
directive leadership and participatory leadership.
This theory was developed by McGregor which was about the X & Y manager theory. It states
that the assumption of leaders concerning human nature influences the whole organizational
leadership stratagem greatly. According to theory X managers, they believe that human beings
are generally lazy and do not want to work thus they should be followed and forced to work
(Grey et al., 2018. P.43). Thus, the leader is required to continuously supervise the stocks of
competence for them to work and achieve the goals of the organization. It is the nature of human
beings to evade work.
Contrary to this, theory Y managers hold the belief that the presence of favorable working
atmosphere supported by the willingness of the workers to carry out their tasks without
supervision is what makes the organization realize its goals. In theory X, the leader here does
have the domineering strict control over their employees while theory Y leaders are considerable
and show sympathy towards their employees. In line with this, the most crucial aspect of
leadership is to value collaboration approach and teamwork (Egner, 2009). It only pays attention
to leadership qualities which are developed throughout life. It is not a guarantee that after
learning the behaviors the leaders will execute them correctly. When the models are studied
empirically, they end up producing different results of managerial grid thus causing disputes that
the managerial grid should be containing more information.
The founder and CEO of Microsoft testify to use a blend of both manager X and manager Y
depending on the character traits of the individual employees. While some employees like
13

Application of Leadership Theories 14
comfort zones, some are flexible and can work in a wide range of environments. It is therefore
paramount for the leader to categories the employee appropriately, especially when working
under pressure (Olusoga, 2014, p. 37). The different groups of employees need different types of
motivation to ensure that the goals of the company are achieved. There are those employees who
are self-motivated and give their best to the company even without supervision.
On the other hand, there are also some employees who lack the self-drive and would easily give
up in tight situations. This type of employees works best under supervision. They have a motive
which may not directly link to the company goals. The kind of motivation applied, in this case, is
different from the one applied on the self-motivated individuals. Application of manager X,
therefore, works best for the less motivated employees. Instead of giving reasons why they have
to work extra – time to achieve goals, it is logical to introduce overtime wages, and they will
work overnight and help the organization achieve its goals.
On the other hand, self-motivated employees do not need monitoring. However, they might need
guidance on the appropriate and most efficient ways and method of achieving the set goals. For
this category of employees, motivations such as recognition of efforts or introduction of an
employee of the year awards are enough to motivate the employees to keep their male for
achieving the company objectives high. In a business setting such as Microsoft, employees are
hired based mainly based on their skills; it is, therefore, vital to evaluate the employees based on
their attitude towards works so that the management of the company can plan on how to work
with them under pressure.
The Great Man Theory
14

Application of Leadership Theories 15
This theory was based on the fact that there are those people who have been destined to escort
others (aristocratic leadership). Power is only confined to the aristocratic individuals. In this
case, those people who belonged to the upper families were envied and looked upon by others
due to their living status. In this line, it was believed that only a limited number of individuals
had unique qualities of becoming leaders. The most criticized misconception of this theory was
the blind conviction that leadership qualities could never be inherited nor learned or passed down
to other people (Offermann et al., 2018.p 13). This theory was very biased even from the term
great man thus orienting the leadership traits to the male sex. This theory is not practical because
when it is applied to the contemporary society, we may end up producing unconstructive
outcome due to the diversity of the stock of competence which gave rise to complex and a more
integrated working environment. This theory when applied it may end up developing pessimism
amongst stock of competence thus leading to diversion goals and objectives of the firm (Lewi
2018, p.32).
The model of the great-man theory fails to address the prospects and the expectations of the
existing contemporary organizational workforce since it is restricted to offering leadership
qualities to the aristocratic families (Offermann et al. 2018, p. 13). The theory seems to be
unreasonable since it advocates for absolute superiority, trying to give out a handpicked set of
qualities and characteristics of the leader to which the theory was developed. This theory
assumes that leaders are born and are not made thus possess certain attributes that were inherited.
It also assumes that great leaders can only arise when there is dire need of them. Even though the
great man theory is not applied intentionally by Bill Gates, it manifests itself naturally in him
about his company. Bill Gates is an existing example of people who are born leaders. The CEO
of Microsoft did not study leadership or MBA, but he makes one of the most successful world
15

Application of Leadership Theories 16
business leaders. The entrepreneurial skills and the managerial ability he exhibits are fully
inbuilt. Through these leadership skills, he has created a business empire with a world-wide
market. It is the leadership in him that saw him develop an interest to pursue his line of codes
and ambition to come to start his own company. The aspirations to lead made him want to take a
different route other than the norm.
Dispersed leadership theory
This is a type of leadership that is informal, and it does not associate itself with the
organizational hierarchal model. It is among the most contemporary methods of leadership were
all individuals within the organization are encouraged to contribute their skills of leadership
without any limitations of hierarchy. The idea of involving all members leads to maximum
productivity in the organization. This theory bases its argument on the fact that developing the
acts of leadership culture and working environment that is conducive can make an organization
to be progressive (Offermann et al. 2018.p 13).
The entrenchment of the responsibilities and commitment of a leader through the entire
organization without the limitation imposed by the formal chain of command provides a higher
affinity towards the success of the organization (Oliveira et al., 2016, p.23). This theory
furthermore argues that the social behavior of an individual together with the relationship of the
person will determine the qualities a leader should possess. The advantages of this theory over
other theories are the fact that it is more responsive to customer and market requirements. It
leads to a quality decision since the combination of thoughts from the various stock of
competence brings about the formulation of viable solution mix. It creates convenient ways of
managing the desired complex demands.
16

Application of Leadership Theories 17
Criticism of the theory
This theory has also been subjected to both professional and scholarly criticism in that when this
theory is followed; it will lead to fragmentation of work if no core value and objectives are being
worked for. The decision-making process may tend to slow down due to the involvement of
more workforce. It also tends to bring down the value of leadership since everyone thinks they
are capable of doing it (Khan, 2015. p.7).
At the initial stages of the company, Bill Gates as the founder and the CEO hired some of his
friends to work with him in his new company. However, he still performed roles that would
naturally be categorized as technical and not managerial. For instance, he handled packaging and
delivery of products when he could assign one of the employees to handle such tasks as he dealt
with managerial duties. Furthermore, the CEO also goes through all the codes line by line to
confirm all the written by the company. He uses the hands-on technique of leadership. Even
though the delegates of the responsibilities to other staff, he remained fully involved in the
operations of the company. Dispersed leadership theory is not widely applicable in the corporate
setting as most managers and corporate leaders stick to their management roles. Bill Gates is one
of the known corporate leaders who apply this leadership theory.
Transactional leadership theory
The transactional theory of leadership is based on the assumption that the only motivation for
people to work should either come in the form of reward or punishment. Furthermore, the theory
stipulates that everybody who accepts a job offer accepts the authority of the manager and that
the prime purpose of an employee is to do what their manager tells them to do (Khan 2017,
17

Application of Leadership Theories 18
p.169). The theory works in the clearly defined organization and leadership structures. It also
assumed that when a manager allocates work to a subordinate, the subordinate becomes wholly
responsible for the task and that they have all the resources they need to accomplish the task.
Critics of the theory point out that the theory is more of a management theory than a leadership
theory.
Furthermore, it has element obtained in the theory of manager x and manager Y. Bill gates
selectively used the elements of this theory in management when it comes to employee
motivation. Some employees attend to their duties in fear of losing their jobs if they do not
perform. This does not only apply to Microsoft Company but also to some corporate in the world
today. On the other hand, good performance towards meeting company goals and objectives is
always rewarded.
Transformational Theory of Leadership
As opposed to the transactional theory of leadership that that uses the reward to achieve the
goals, transformative leadership theory points out that a leader can make a connection with the
team members or the followers to raise the level of motivation and morality (Tepper 2018, p.
1357). Transformative leaders, therefore, do not require the use of incentives to motivate the
followers, on the contrary, the followers felt motivated and intrigued to act morally just by
connecting to the leader. They draw their inspiration from the leader. In the corporate setting,
this kind of leadership style is rarely pointed out as it is always overshadowed by the blend of
other leadership styles (Hamza and Abdelmonem, 2018, p 48). In most cases, transformative
leadership is practiced alongside different leadership style such as transactional leadership to
bridge the gap created by the difference in personalities in of the employees.
18

Application of Leadership Theories 19
Bill Gate has applied this leadership theory both within his company and outside the company. In
the company, the CEO’s story of how the company was formed act as an inspiration to some
employees who would want to emulate their boss both in actions an in character (Company
Spotlight: Microsoft Corporation’2004, p. 57). While most of the weight of the applicability of
the theory relies on the perception of the employees of the leader, it is upon the leader to develop
character traits that are admirable by the followers. The enthusiasm that Gates has towards the
growth of the company encourages some employees who work in the company to work with
diligence and emulate his passion. Outside the organization, the charitable works of the corporate
leader and the impact it has in the lives of the people not only in the USA but also in other parts
of the world (Levine 2016, p. 7). Through his charitable actions, he has encouraged some people
from all over the world to participate in charitable activities and support of the less privileged in
the society.
Conclusion
Leadership involves three key aspects. The first one is the individual who steers the vision and
guides others towards achieving the vision. The second aspect of leadership is the group of
individuals who are willing to be guided by the individual with the vision. The third aspect is a
common goal; all the individuals in the group should work towards achievement on a common
goal. The leadership theory provides an abstract explanation of the methods of leadership that
various leaders apply to meet their objectives. Various corporate heads and other organization
leaders apply different leadership theories. Most of the leaders apply a combination of various
leadership theories in their organizations and companies. In the case of the CEO of Microsoft, a
19

Application of Leadership Theories 20
combination of the following theories is applied in the running of the multi-billion company.
Participative, trait, situation and contingency and dispersed leadership theories. These theories
are evident from the operation of Microsoft Company and the decisions of the Bill gates in
running the company. It is evident that the success of Bill Gates and his company has come as a
result of the application of some of the best leadership theories and practices. It is also true that
CEO was born a leader and that he natured his leadership and entrepreneurial skills through
taking risks and grabbing opportunities. As the company grew to get international attention, the
employees of the company had to increase in number as the products of the company were sold
and used all over the world. This gives the CEO a big team to manage. The management requires
setting goals, motivating the employees and handling some of the jobs directly in order o achieve
the company objectives and goals. Bill Gates had maintained some of the leadership traits that he
had when he started the company through the growth of the company to date. The difference is
the large team that he now has to work with. At the early stages of the development of the
company, Microsoft under the leadership of Bill Gates sort to provide computer software to all
the PC clones that were produced at the time. This move was to dominate the market and was
motivated by the situation of the market. Today, all the computers that come with Windows
software have a default browser for internet use. This move is still aimed at achieving the current
market dominance. Most of the decisions and actions of Bill Gates about Microsoft Company
can be explained using the leadership theories and various leadership styles. The actions and
decisions are the application of leadership theories.
References
20

Application of Leadership Theories 21
‘The Forbes 400. (cover story)’ (1998) Forbes, 162(8), pp. 165–428. Available at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=1114334&site=ehost-live
(Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Boje, D. and Smith, R. (2010) ‘Re-storying and visualizing the changing entrepreneurial
identities of Bill Gates and Richard Branson’, Culture & Organization, 16(4), pp. 307–331. doi:
10.1080/14759551003769250.
Burris, K. (2013) ‘Asian Americans’ and Caucasians’ implicit leadership theories: Asian
stereotypes, transformational, and authentic leadership’, Asian American Journal of Psychology,
4(4), pp. 258–266. doi: 10.1037/a0035229.
Chakravartula, C. M. (2017) ‘Face the Books: A Leadership Journey’, Journal of Library
Administration, 57(6), pp. 701–711. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2017.1340766.
Company Spotlight: Microsoft Corporation’ (2004) MarketWatch: Technology, 3(9), pp. 51–59.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=14386299&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 10 October 2018).
Cornwell, T. B., Howard-Grenville, J. and Hampel, C. E. (2018) ‘The Company You Keep: How
an Organization’s Horizontal Partnerships Affect Employee Organizational Identification’,
Academy of Management Review, 43(4), pp. 772–791. doi: 10.5465/amr.2016.0209.
Dootson, P. (2016) ‘Where do consumers draw the line? Factors informing perceptions and
justifications of deviant consumer behaviour’, Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7–8), pp.
750–776. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1131734.
21

Application of Leadership Theories 22
Granshaw, M. (2014) ‘Performing Cultural Memory: The Travelling Hibernicon and the
Transnational Irish Community in the United States and Australia’, Nineteenth Century Theatre
& Film, 41(2), pp. 76–101. doi: 10.7227/NTCF.41.2.5.
Hamza, A. And Abdelmonem, M. (2018) ‘The Relationship between Transformational
Leadership and Employee Empowermentin Certain Egyptian Sports Federations’, Ovidius
University Annals, Series Physical Education & Sport/Science, Movement & Health, 18(2), pp.
119–124. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=s3h&AN=130442227&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 10 October 2018).
Huang, X. (2012) ‘Helplessness of empowerment: The joint effect of participative leadership and
controllability attributional style on empowerment and performance’, Human Relations, 65(3),
pp. 313–334. doi: 10.1177/0018726711429876.
Jones, B. A. (2007) ‘“Table Top Theory” as a Policy Framework for Gauging the Confluence of
Teaching and Private Sector Interests’, Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(2), pp. 185–204.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=eft&AN=507973953&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Khan, H. (2015) ‘An Investigation of Leadership Theories Best Fitting the Professors’ Tripartite
Scholarly Activities Relating to Teaching, Research, and Service--Part 1’, Competition Forum,
13(2), pp. 350–370. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=s3h&AN=113046507&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 8 October 2018).
Khan, N. (2017) ‘Adaptive or Transactional Leadership in Current Higher Education: A Brief
Comparison’, International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 18(3), pp. 178–
22

Application of Leadership Theories 23
183. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=eft&AN=123305868&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Kupfer, A. and Gates, B. (1996) ‘GATES on BUFFETT’, Fortune, 133(2), pp. 102–104.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=9601187672&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 10 October 2018).
Larsson, G. (2017) ‘Leadership behavior changes following a theory-based leadership
development intervention: A longitudinal study of subordinates’ and leaders’
evaluations’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(1), pp. 62–68. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12337.
Levine, M. (2016) ‘Andrew Carnegie and Bill Gates: Philanthropy and oligarchy, then and
now’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(1), pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1037/ort0000150.
Lewis, K. (2018) ‘Gender-Gaps, Gender-Based Social Norms, and Conditioning from the
Vantage Point of Leadership Theories,’ International Forum of Teaching & Studies, 14(1), pp.
17–25. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=eft&AN=129377823&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 8 October 2018).
Lyons, D. (2010) ‘Bill Gates/Randi Weingarten’, Newsweek, 156(26/1), pp. 52–55. Available at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=56666169&site=ehost-live
(Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Microsoft Corporation (2017) Microsoft Corporation MarketLine Company Profile, pp. 1–53.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=124666926&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 9 October 2018).
23

Application of Leadership Theories 24
Offermann, L. R. and Coats, M. R. (2018) ‘Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change
over two decades’, Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.003.
Oliveira, K. A. C. (2016) ‘Children’s Implicit Leadership Theories in Middle Childhood:
Christian Children’s Perceptions in the Cavite Province,’ Journal of Research on Christian
Education, 25(3), pp. 251–272. doi: 10.1080/10656219.2016.1237908.
Olusoga, P. (2014) ‘Coaching under Pressure: Mental skills training for sports coaches’, Sport &
Exercise Psychology Review, 10(3), pp. 31–44. Available at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=97467358&site=ehost-live
(Accessed: 10 October 2018).
Schlender, B. and Ballen, K. (1995) ‘What Bill Gates REALLY Wants. (cover story)’, Fortune,
131(1), pp. 34–36. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=9501097633&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Schyns, B. (2011) ‘Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership:
How and Why It Can Make a Difference’, Academy of Management Learning & Education,
10(3), pp. 397–408. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=67074182&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 8 October 2018).
Stone, A. (2001) ‘Microsoft’s Staying Power on the Street’, BusinessWeek Online, p. N.PAG.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=6089861&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 10 October 2018).
24

Application of Leadership Theories 25
Stone, M. (2002) ‘Introduction to IBM marketing suite’, Journal of Database Marketing, 10(1),
p. 37. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=7300005&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 9 October 2018).
Suder, G. G. S. (2005) ‘Interview with Jean-Philippe Courtois, CEO, Microsoft EMEA’,
Thunderbird International Business Review, 47(2), pp. 153–161. doi: 10.1002/tie.20046.
Summerfield, M. R. (2014) ‘Leadership: A simple definition,’ American Journal of Health-
System Pharmacy, 71(3), pp. 251–253. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130435.
Tepper, B. J. (2018) ‘Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a
Dynamic, Person–Environment Fit Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), pp.
1343–1368. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0163.
Van Wart, M. (2013) ‘Lessons from Leadership Theory and the Contemporary Challenges of
Leaders’, Public Administration Review, 73(4), pp. 553–565. doi: 10.1111/puar.12069.
25