NSW Legal Ethics: Case Study on Misappropriation of Client Funds

This case study delves into the critical aspects of legal ethics in New South Wales, specifically addressing the misappropriation of client funds by a solicitor, Tim Ticker. The study presents a detailed analysis of the ethical and legal ramifications, referencing the Australian Solicitor Conduct Rules and relevant case laws such as Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association and PAUL THOMAS COE v THE NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION. It identifies the core issue as a breach of professional conduct and violation of legal ethical codes, leading to a loss of trust in the judiciary. The judgement emphasizes Tim Ticker's liability under the Australian Solicitor Conduct Rules and the need to maintain judicial decorum. The conclusion reinforces the importance of legal ethics in upholding court proceedings and ensuring ethical standards within the legal profession. Desklib provides access to similar case studies and solved assignments for students.

Legal Ethics NSW

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
Prepare a judgement ..............................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
REFRENCES ................................................................................................................................6

INTRODUCTION
Legal ethics are those principles which is used by legal profession in order to make sure
that legal practices is done in effective manner. These ethics has been helping in making better
professional perspectives developed in relation to those aspects that helps in achieving better
results in relation legal conduct. Such aspects has been making development of proper legal
framework which makes all kinds of elements covered that impacts courts ethical perspective. In
this file things covered is based upon case scenario which is related to misappropriation of
client's fund. In relation to this judgement is required to be presented providing relevancy to case
scenario.
MAIN BODY
Prepare a judgement
Issue: The main issue that has been marked out is related over misappropriation of clients
funds. This means when funds of client has been used with an intention of illegal means by
another person for one's own use or another unauthorized person. This kinds of misappropriation
can be conducted in any profession. The public official, trustee of a trust, an executor or
administrator of a dead person or by any person with responsibility to care for protection of
another assets(Bateman, 2017). It is consider to be an public offence. It can be understood with
an example that is Connecticut, an attorney who knowingly misappropriates a client's
funds or other property held in trust will be disbarred. A claim for misappropriation of
funds is subject to statute of limitations. When a claim is brought against the alleged thief
of the goods, the statute runs from the time of the theft even if the property owner was
unaware of the theft at the time that it occurred.
Rule:
Fraudulent misappropriation of funds is an offence which is covered within Australian
Solicitor Conduct Rules. In the act its has been explained that a person having collected upon
reeving money upon valuable security is required to be delivered as part of someone that has
been used in fraudulent means and makes person guilty of offence. This offence has been
punishable by maximum penalty of imprisonment of seven years in New, South, Wales. Further,

the act has been dealing with the offence that has been heard within the local court. The
maximum penalty that is imposed over single summary offence which is an imprisonment for
two years. In the act many offences has been carrying a penalty or fine. Summary of offences
within the act involves offences include those offences which are against the legal conduct
existing in an organization(Baron, and Corbin, 2017). This mainly includes offences which are
related over professional conducts. Then under legal ethical code of conduct in Australia are
Professional rules in this legal profession has been essentially regulating over particular state and
territory which is based upon making professional legal conduct to be divided within solicitor
and barristers. Under it various kinds of jurisdictions are covered. The profession has been
combined with those practices(Devlin, and Frame, 2019). In this purpose solicitor and barristers
are regulated separately by professional legal bodies like law societies and bar associations.
Legal profession rules are binding on Australian legal practitioners and Australian-registered
foreign lawyers to whom they apply. Both the laws are applied within the case scenario as the
scenario is based upon misappropriation of fund which is part of legal profession.
Relevant case laws
Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association
PAUL THOMAS COE v THE NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION
The case is based upon Professional misconduct of legal practitioner and findings outside
the scope of charge intent. Facts of the case is that appellant has been found guilty over
professional misconduct by legal services tribunal in relation over for falsely swearing an
affidavit with intent. In this tribunal ordered appellant name was removed from the role of Legal
Practitioners(Andrasi, , 2018). Under it appeal within which an issue was whether the tribunal's
has been finding went out of the scope in relation to charge. The tribunal has founded that
appellant has signed false affidavit within which reference is not intended. In the case further
evidence over appellants was in relation over good character. It was held in the case that it has
been foreseeable over submissions taking place during the course of proceedings, some
references that makes appellant intention marked. In this tribunal was entitled for finding out
false sign over affidavit. Also the case another aspect has been marked which is based upon
refusal of fresh evidence. The appeal regarding the aspects was presented which said that an
application for admission, rather than an appeal against the tribunal's finding. Also in this case it
was marked out that appellant swore upon false affidavit which makes member to speculate

about the appeal. The evidence has been presented over coming to an conclusion that it has been
intended for deceiving other persons. In this obligation was based upon tribunal over drawing out
reason regarding motive of appellant.
Judgement to be marked out
In relation to the above scenario it has been observed that Tim Ticker has used money of
Jane without her consent which makes him amount to misappropriation of funds. Since it is an
criminal offence so it has been marked out the Tim Ticker is brought under enquiry regarding the
misconduct(Hahn, 2018). This Tim Ticker is held liable within the Australian Solicitor Conduct
Rules which makes liability created in relation to violation of professional conduct. Also he has
violated legal ethical code making decorum of court break which amounts to legal breach.
Further, it has been identified that such misconduct has caused loss of trust over judiciary and in
order to maintain it the following judgement has been passed.
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion it can be concluded that legal ethics are those aspect which is
used in order to make discipline developed within proceedings of court. Also through the aspects
ethical aspects has been enshrined. In this file an judgement has been prepared by marking out
issues in relation over legal professional conduct. The issue identified is based upon
misrepresentation of funds that is an criminal offence. Also relevant cases has been explained in
relation to misrepresentation. In the end judgement is produced out of analysis done in relation
over case scenario that has been explained.

REFRENCES
Books and Journals
Andrasi, G., 2018. Hungarian legal ethics education: changes in accreditation standards. The
Law Teacher, 52(2), pp.231-235.
Baron, P. and Corbin, L., 2017. Ethics and Professionalism in Australia. Oxford University
Press.
Bateman, E., 2017. Lessons from America: How Modern Law Schools Should be Teaching
Legal Ethics. Available at SSRN 3265786.
Devlin, R. and Frame, S., 2019. Economic corruption, political machinations and legal ethics:
correspondents’ report from Canada. Legal Ethics, 22(1-2), pp.94-102.
Hahn, J., 2018. Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde’s Approach to Natural Law as Normative Legal
Ethics. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 7(1), pp.28-50.
Longan, P.E., 2018. Legal Ethics. Mercer L. Rev., 70, p.141.
Menkel-Meadow, C., 2017. The evolving complexity of dispute resolution ethics. Geo. J. Legal
Ethics, 30, p.389.
Newman Knake, R. and Murphy, E., 2018. Legal Ethics for the Real World: Building Skills
Through Case Study (Table of Contents, Introduction and Chapter 1). PROFESSIONAL
RESPONSIBILITY: A CONTEMPORARY APPROACH (Third Edition 2017).
ten Have, H. and Neves, M.D.C.P., 2021. Legal Ethics. In Dictionary of Global Bioethics (pp.
675-675). Springer, Cham.
TO, B., 2019. Topical issues of legal ethics and responsibility for its violation. Probs.
Legality, 145, p.205.
Yamane, N., 2020. Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Field and the Indispensable Human
Element Legal Ethics Demands. Geo. J. Legal Ethics, 33, p.877.