Letter of Advice: Addressing Legal Issues for Fleur Online Beauty
VerifiedAdded on 2022/12/14
|8
|2140
|151
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a detailed letter of advice addressing legal issues faced by Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd., focusing on animal testing and data disclosure concerns. The analysis examines the legal ramifications of the company's practices, specifically the conflict between its public stance on anima...
Read More
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

Letter of Advice Marking
1
1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

Contents
Legal Issues arising on Facts-......................................................................................................3
Legal rules-..................................................................................................................................4
Application of rules to issues-.....................................................................................................5
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................8
2
Legal Issues arising on Facts-......................................................................................................3
Legal rules-..................................................................................................................................4
Application of rules to issues-.....................................................................................................5
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................8
2

Dear Ivy and Daisy,
Legal Issues arising on Facts-
As per given case study, it has been identified the different legal issues or problem, when
expanding the business in marketplace.
Animal testing issue- on the basis of evidence, it has been released by Ivy and Daisy with
a shock that one of their best selling product or service in marketplace. But it indeed involvement
of extensive animal testing. Whenever, enterprise is selling skincare items in graduate people So
that it would require to maintain a proper regulation (Amberg and Fogarassy, 2019). Otherwise,
it appears that some of other kind of skincare product that they have been selling which not
undergone any kind of tests. Afterwards, consumer can use these kind of products which causes
as long standing people face a quite server allergic reactions. In this way, it is directly affecting
the reputation of business in marketplace. On the basis of evidence, it has been examined that
limited Research was directly affecting the overall business profitable rate.
Animal testing related issue has been arises, when Skin product selling enterprise is not
performed animal experiments, which are widely used to develop a new item and test the safety
of other skin items. Sometimes, different kind of experiment cause the pain to animal and
involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways. As per given Scenario, Ivy and Daisy will
agree with animal protection but they can perform such experiment testing. Therefore, it can
easily represents the positive result or outcome of skin items. in current scenario, humans are
mainly focused on the benefits, advantage of product which could be obtained by using specific
method or technique.
Information disclose issue- Disclosure is one of the most common issue identified that
make facts or information known to the public. As per evidence, it has been identified the
information disclosure issue where Helga, an employee of fleur online beauty pvt ltd.
Threatening to go into media and share a company’s information (Helm and et. al., 2018). The
owner of enterprise has been considered that Helga to be trouble makers and poor performers. At
3
Legal Issues arising on Facts-
As per given case study, it has been identified the different legal issues or problem, when
expanding the business in marketplace.
Animal testing issue- on the basis of evidence, it has been released by Ivy and Daisy with
a shock that one of their best selling product or service in marketplace. But it indeed involvement
of extensive animal testing. Whenever, enterprise is selling skincare items in graduate people So
that it would require to maintain a proper regulation (Amberg and Fogarassy, 2019). Otherwise,
it appears that some of other kind of skincare product that they have been selling which not
undergone any kind of tests. Afterwards, consumer can use these kind of products which causes
as long standing people face a quite server allergic reactions. In this way, it is directly affecting
the reputation of business in marketplace. On the basis of evidence, it has been examined that
limited Research was directly affecting the overall business profitable rate.
Animal testing related issue has been arises, when Skin product selling enterprise is not
performed animal experiments, which are widely used to develop a new item and test the safety
of other skin items. Sometimes, different kind of experiment cause the pain to animal and
involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways. As per given Scenario, Ivy and Daisy will
agree with animal protection but they can perform such experiment testing. Therefore, it can
easily represents the positive result or outcome of skin items. in current scenario, humans are
mainly focused on the benefits, advantage of product which could be obtained by using specific
method or technique.
Information disclose issue- Disclosure is one of the most common issue identified that
make facts or information known to the public. As per evidence, it has been identified the
information disclosure issue where Helga, an employee of fleur online beauty pvt ltd.
Threatening to go into media and share a company’s information (Helm and et. al., 2018). The
owner of enterprise has been considered that Helga to be trouble makers and poor performers. At
3

that time, Ivy and Daisy will try to convince their Helga, where they are not disclosing any kind
of information of company. Otherwise, it will be terminated their contract of employment
immediately.
Information disclosure vulnerabilities can have impact in both direct and indirect ways,
which may be depending on the purpose. Therefore, evidence shows the sensitive information
for business where some employees are trying to leak data. In some cases, the act of disclosing
sensitive information alone can develop as greater impact on the overall business performance.
The owner of enterprise has been signed a legal contract for every employees whereas they are
not sharing company’s sensitive information or data in outside. Otherwise, it has been occurred
as legal action against the person. In this way, information disclosure issue is handled in ethical
way to promote the awareness among individual people in the workplace.
Legal rules-
According to the given case study it has come into observation that there are various
kinds of legal issues that have been arising within company because of which not only their
brand reputation is getting damaged but it is also impacting relationship between all the four
shareholders.
First legal issue faced by Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. Is that on public domain they have
declared that they are animal protection activist but despite of this given information on public
domain, their best selling product has been involved in extensive animal testing. As per the
privacy Act is important for organization to present their privacy policies to global privacy laws.
It is one of the main principle that they need to follow which is to be transparent and open. If
Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. Hides the fact that their best selling product has been involved in
extensive animal testing but public information provided by them is that they are animal
protection activist. This will break their legal principle of being open and honest. This will
further result in breaking of Animal Act, 1979 (Millard, 2019). This is because it is important for
organizations to openly disclose that they were involved in animal testing and what kind of
testing is being done on Animals. Not disclosing can result in some legal consequences that can
4
of information of company. Otherwise, it will be terminated their contract of employment
immediately.
Information disclosure vulnerabilities can have impact in both direct and indirect ways,
which may be depending on the purpose. Therefore, evidence shows the sensitive information
for business where some employees are trying to leak data. In some cases, the act of disclosing
sensitive information alone can develop as greater impact on the overall business performance.
The owner of enterprise has been signed a legal contract for every employees whereas they are
not sharing company’s sensitive information or data in outside. Otherwise, it has been occurred
as legal action against the person. In this way, information disclosure issue is handled in ethical
way to promote the awareness among individual people in the workplace.
Legal rules-
According to the given case study it has come into observation that there are various
kinds of legal issues that have been arising within company because of which not only their
brand reputation is getting damaged but it is also impacting relationship between all the four
shareholders.
First legal issue faced by Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. Is that on public domain they have
declared that they are animal protection activist but despite of this given information on public
domain, their best selling product has been involved in extensive animal testing. As per the
privacy Act is important for organization to present their privacy policies to global privacy laws.
It is one of the main principle that they need to follow which is to be transparent and open. If
Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. Hides the fact that their best selling product has been involved in
extensive animal testing but public information provided by them is that they are animal
protection activist. This will break their legal principle of being open and honest. This will
further result in breaking of Animal Act, 1979 (Millard, 2019). This is because it is important for
organizations to openly disclose that they were involved in animal testing and what kind of
testing is being done on Animals. Not disclosing can result in some legal consequences that can
4
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

be faced by company. It is one of the main responsibility of the organization to maintain validity
of information provided by them on public portal. In case any kind of information provided on
public portal is not being flowed then on the basis of that information consumers can drag
company to court legally and ask for compensation.
Another legal issue that can be faced by Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. is of non-disclosure
of information issue in which Basil who was the sole shareholder of Lisab Pty Ltd. It is one of
the main legal principle of signing a contract to disclose and exchange all important information
with each other. While signing a contract it is extremely important for both the parties to identify
loopholes within a contract and include a clause of disclosing important information with each
other. In such case in order to avoid future complications both the parties should involve event of
contract breach term and condition. While the contract is valid and one of those parties find that
some of the most important information is hidden from them in on the basis of this, that contract
can be discarded easily (Meigs and et. al., 2018). While signing a contract both the parties are
required to disclose their personal and relevant information to each other. So this clearly helps in
understanding that it is important that should be included and terns and condition of contract
should be reviewed twice before signing. If any kind of non-disclosure of information term is
been broken and this clause is mentioned in the contract then in such case contract can be broken
and contract braking party can be asked for compensation for the same.
Application of rules to issues-
In Australian, it is implementing a ban on the cosmetic testing on the animals. It means
that new ingredients used in exclusively in different cosmetic items, or imported into Australia
where they cannot use specific information from animal testing to prove as safety aspects.
According to industrial Cosmetic act 2019, it has been applied this legal regulation along
with different chemical industries, who are manufacturer different skin related product in
marketplace. As per implementation of regulation, it is consistently with remain protect human
health and environment (Belinfanti and Stout, 2017). While there is new trends away from
animal testing. Some people are not completely aware about certain kind of risks, threat. The act
5
of information provided by them on public portal. In case any kind of information provided on
public portal is not being flowed then on the basis of that information consumers can drag
company to court legally and ask for compensation.
Another legal issue that can be faced by Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd. is of non-disclosure
of information issue in which Basil who was the sole shareholder of Lisab Pty Ltd. It is one of
the main legal principle of signing a contract to disclose and exchange all important information
with each other. While signing a contract it is extremely important for both the parties to identify
loopholes within a contract and include a clause of disclosing important information with each
other. In such case in order to avoid future complications both the parties should involve event of
contract breach term and condition. While the contract is valid and one of those parties find that
some of the most important information is hidden from them in on the basis of this, that contract
can be discarded easily (Meigs and et. al., 2018). While signing a contract both the parties are
required to disclose their personal and relevant information to each other. So this clearly helps in
understanding that it is important that should be included and terns and condition of contract
should be reviewed twice before signing. If any kind of non-disclosure of information term is
been broken and this clause is mentioned in the contract then in such case contract can be broken
and contract braking party can be asked for compensation for the same.
Application of rules to issues-
In Australian, it is implementing a ban on the cosmetic testing on the animals. It means
that new ingredients used in exclusively in different cosmetic items, or imported into Australia
where they cannot use specific information from animal testing to prove as safety aspects.
According to industrial Cosmetic act 2019, it has been applied this legal regulation along
with different chemical industries, who are manufacturer different skin related product in
marketplace. As per implementation of regulation, it is consistently with remain protect human
health and environment (Belinfanti and Stout, 2017). While there is new trends away from
animal testing. Some people are not completely aware about certain kind of risks, threat. The act
5

can be established by Australian government scheme which means that minimize level of risk
among animal, human. On behalf of regulation, it has been issued the certificate by director of
every commercial enterprise. In order to consider all kind of health & safety measurement.
Moreover, any kind of animal testing occurred that means to record data or information of
specific rules. It cannot be used “any live vertebrate” animal for purpose of product testing.
According to the act, it should be prescribed a specific kind of rule or regulation in proper
manner.
On the other hand, It has been identified the information or data disclosure issue in the
organization. Usually, it is becoming harmful for entire business reputation so that Australian
government implement as data protection Act 2014, including privacy principles. Within specific
circumstances in which use and disclosure is permitted. But according to evidence, it has been
examined that particular employee for online skin product selling enterprise will try to share the
sensitive information of organization (Helm and et. al., 2018). At that time, Data protection act
2014 has been used by owner of enterprise and also related to the principles disclosure in each
perspectives.
For Example- each and every stakeholder have a right to express their opinion or view
about the use of disclosure of personal information. But company will not allow for individual
people to directly interact with outsider, share any kind of information. On the basis of evidence,
it has been identified that Helga, an employee of Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd threatening to go
media with sensitive information. At that time, It should applicable as data protection act, remind
her of the confidentiality agreement. In this way, stakeholder supported the extending to the
business and always try to establish a strong relationship.
Australian government regulates information privacy and protection through federal state,
territory laws. In order to include a proper Australian privacy principle (APP), which contained
in privacy act apply to Cosmetic business industries. Especially regulators have been expressed a
certain expectation that regulated entities. In order to protect or secure sensitive data or
information in proper manner.
6
among animal, human. On behalf of regulation, it has been issued the certificate by director of
every commercial enterprise. In order to consider all kind of health & safety measurement.
Moreover, any kind of animal testing occurred that means to record data or information of
specific rules. It cannot be used “any live vertebrate” animal for purpose of product testing.
According to the act, it should be prescribed a specific kind of rule or regulation in proper
manner.
On the other hand, It has been identified the information or data disclosure issue in the
organization. Usually, it is becoming harmful for entire business reputation so that Australian
government implement as data protection Act 2014, including privacy principles. Within specific
circumstances in which use and disclosure is permitted. But according to evidence, it has been
examined that particular employee for online skin product selling enterprise will try to share the
sensitive information of organization (Helm and et. al., 2018). At that time, Data protection act
2014 has been used by owner of enterprise and also related to the principles disclosure in each
perspectives.
For Example- each and every stakeholder have a right to express their opinion or view
about the use of disclosure of personal information. But company will not allow for individual
people to directly interact with outsider, share any kind of information. On the basis of evidence,
it has been identified that Helga, an employee of Fleur Online Beauty Pty Ltd threatening to go
media with sensitive information. At that time, It should applicable as data protection act, remind
her of the confidentiality agreement. In this way, stakeholder supported the extending to the
business and always try to establish a strong relationship.
Australian government regulates information privacy and protection through federal state,
territory laws. In order to include a proper Australian privacy principle (APP), which contained
in privacy act apply to Cosmetic business industries. Especially regulators have been expressed a
certain expectation that regulated entities. In order to protect or secure sensitive data or
information in proper manner.
6

Conclusion
From above discussion, it has concluded that advice Ivy and Daisy in relation to animal
testing, data discourse issue within organization. It has been concerned about the legal issues
arising on the facts, accuracy of identification of relevant issues on given case problem. Analysis
legal principles which helps for maintain or control the critical situation or condition. Moreover,
it has been applied the relevant laws to specific issues.
On the basis of fact in given case problem such as information disclosure and animal
testing. These are identified the most common issues and consider as important aspect by
business stakeholders such Ivy and Daisy. In order to conduct a meeting and discussion on the
particular areas of issue where it can retain control and ensure that overall business company
maintain its current business model. It ensuring that does not sell beauty products, involve
animal testing. So as implementing the suitable legislation in regard industrial Cosmetic act
2019. Through this act, it has been summarized that enterprise use a specific restrict procedures
or policies to control the animal testing. On the other hand, it has been summarized about the
data protection 2014, which primarily used in the cosmetic enterprises, those are selling a beauty
products in marketplace . As per analysis, it has been identified that major involvement of
employee cause the reputation or brand image. This is because of disclosure of company’
sensitive information or data in front of outsiders. Therefore, it has been implementing data
protection act 2014, as legal privacy principle in which supports for protecting the sensitive
information. As per discussion, it has been identified that each and every employees signed a
contract agreement as employment, did not disclose any kind information enterprise information
or data.
7
From above discussion, it has concluded that advice Ivy and Daisy in relation to animal
testing, data discourse issue within organization. It has been concerned about the legal issues
arising on the facts, accuracy of identification of relevant issues on given case problem. Analysis
legal principles which helps for maintain or control the critical situation or condition. Moreover,
it has been applied the relevant laws to specific issues.
On the basis of fact in given case problem such as information disclosure and animal
testing. These are identified the most common issues and consider as important aspect by
business stakeholders such Ivy and Daisy. In order to conduct a meeting and discussion on the
particular areas of issue where it can retain control and ensure that overall business company
maintain its current business model. It ensuring that does not sell beauty products, involve
animal testing. So as implementing the suitable legislation in regard industrial Cosmetic act
2019. Through this act, it has been summarized that enterprise use a specific restrict procedures
or policies to control the animal testing. On the other hand, it has been summarized about the
data protection 2014, which primarily used in the cosmetic enterprises, those are selling a beauty
products in marketplace . As per analysis, it has been identified that major involvement of
employee cause the reputation or brand image. This is because of disclosure of company’
sensitive information or data in front of outsiders. Therefore, it has been implementing data
protection act 2014, as legal privacy principle in which supports for protecting the sensitive
information. As per discussion, it has been identified that each and every employees signed a
contract agreement as employment, did not disclose any kind information enterprise information
or data.
7
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

REFERENCES
Book and Journals
Amberg, N. and Fogarassy, C., 2019. Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics
market. Resources. 8(3). p.137.
Belinfanti, T. and Stout, L., 2017. Contested visions: The value of systems theory for corporate
law. U. Pa. L. Rev. 166. p.579.
Helm, R.K., and et. al., 2018. Limitations on the ability to negotiate justice: Attorney
perspectives on guilt, innocence, and legal advice in the current plea
system. Psychology, Crime & Law. 24(9). pp.915-934.
Meigs, L., and et. al., 2018. Animal testing and its alternatives: the most important omics is
economics. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation: ALTEX. 35(3). pp.275-305.
Millard, D., 2019. Liability for non-disclosure in pre-contractual negotiations.
8
Book and Journals
Amberg, N. and Fogarassy, C., 2019. Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics
market. Resources. 8(3). p.137.
Belinfanti, T. and Stout, L., 2017. Contested visions: The value of systems theory for corporate
law. U. Pa. L. Rev. 166. p.579.
Helm, R.K., and et. al., 2018. Limitations on the ability to negotiate justice: Attorney
perspectives on guilt, innocence, and legal advice in the current plea
system. Psychology, Crime & Law. 24(9). pp.915-934.
Meigs, L., and et. al., 2018. Animal testing and its alternatives: the most important omics is
economics. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation: ALTEX. 35(3). pp.275-305.
Millard, D., 2019. Liability for non-disclosure in pre-contractual negotiations.
8
1 out of 8

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.