Essay on the Roles of Legal Professionals in England

Desklib provides past papers and solved assignments for students. This essay analyzes the diverging roles of legal professionals in England.

The distinction between the legal professionals of the English
legal system is clouded and lacks any real divergence in their
respective roles.

Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Main Body..................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
Reference List..........................................................................................................................11
2

Introduction
The legal system of any of the country needs to be clear to all the people living in it. There
are some particular aspects, which give a relevant knowledge related with proper kind of
assessment of the scenario. The possibility of having a major issue is related with proper
situational development. The legal authorities have to consider the facts to be related with the
requirement of the citizens. The roles and responsibilities are always clearly stated to the
people so that they can get assistance when they need it. The possibility of having a major
issue is related with the demand of the people. In the following segment of the essay, a clear a
precise discussion is going to be conducted which will articulate the roles of different legal
professional of the English legal system. There have been many issues, which are associated
with understanding of the matters, which force the professional to work beyond their rights to
make sure that the plaintiff is supported well. The discussion is going to make a justified
evaluation of the roles and responsibilities that are associated with the legal responsibilities of
the professionals.
3

Main Body
Management process of the English legal system is facing major challenges that are
associated with work roles of the professional. It is seen among the people that they are not
performing only the given responsibility but they are also giving the best kind of response to
the people who are associated with the plaintiff segment1. Issues have been discovered related
with proficient knowledge of the people who are working in the scenario. It is argument
among the critics that the roles are not clear to the people but they are behaving leniently. The
management of the work force and culture needs to make some amendments in order to make
a better kind of approach to the issues. The management process has to be checked and they
should enhance the services, which are associated with proper kind of roles specification.
This is going to result in a proper prospect, which will lead towards making a better kind of
job execution.
There are different types of people involved in the legal matters and the roles of them are
separate as well. The process of making a better kind of scenario needs to be enhanced in
order to draw a logical conclusion. The roles of different people have top the understood first
in order to make a justified statement towards performing the activities. The different
designations are Arbitrator and mediator, Legal secretary, Notary, Paralegal, Law costs
draftsman, Legal cashier, Legal executive, Solicitor, Usher, Barrister, Judge and many others.
It is argued that the functionality of the people is not limited to the given segments and this is
making them work more to the situation development process2. It is a necessary factor to be
taken into consideration because in the end it is harming their productivity. They often use
the clouded responsibilities in order to get less work done by them. On the other hand, the
service providers often misuse their responsibilities as well and they took advantage of the
situation.
The role of the arbitrators can be taken into consideration as well because they are one of the
non-judicial bodies of the entire legal system. There are many segments where it is seen that
the issues are minimised in a proper manner by the authority by using their professional
1 Stuckey, R., 2017. Best practices for legal education
2 Ritchey, K.L. and Vanek, C., Thomson Reuters Global Resources ULC, 2018. Systems, methods, and interfaces for aggregating and
providing information regarding legal professionals. U.S. Patent 9,904,712.
4

skills3. If the roles of the arbitrators are taken into consideration then it can be stated that they
are not liable to contribute to the legal matters in judicial aspects. There have been cases
where the arbitrators took major roles in resolving the issues on the outer sides of the court.
In accordance with the employment contracts that are assigned by the UK employment
authority, the arbitrators are liable to make settlement outside the court, with no legal
attachments. Giving advice is not their job but they can give decisions to the issues after
hearing from the plaintiff and the defendants. Taking sides of any person is strictly prohibited
but reports say that they act against it and by clouding their responsibility and rights; they are
violating the contract paper.
The job role of the Barristers does not allow them to make any kind of decision out of the
court and if they are doing it then they are making a wrong statement. Being a Barrister, they
are violating the norms, which that have to follow strictly. The management process does not
allow them to make any kind of statement outside of the court. That is the sole responsibility
of the arbitrators. In the UK legal system, it is one of the most prominent incidents to make a
better kind of statement. The management needs to make sure that they are making a positive
statement regarding the issue minimisation. The job role of the barristers and the arbitrators
are different and this kind of activity from the barristers’ end is hampering the income of the
arbitrators as well4. The highly qualified barristers with proper experience sometimes are
allocated with certain works by the higher authorities of their union, which are not a part of
their concern. Inexperienced people get the job done but being not performed in a proficient
manner, they get a negative feedback from the end of the service receivers. Ultimately, the
services get wasted. It is better to get the job done with the most proficient people and in
accordance with different types of data sources, the service providers are lagging proper kind
of human support.
One of the major confusion in job responsibility and execution can be seen in the cashier and
cost draftsman’s job role. It is one of the major factors, which being related to the financial
sides of the legal prospects the service providers do not get any relaxation and their job roles
are often altered. The job role of the Law costs draftsman is unique where they try to deal
3 Wiggers, G., Verberne, S. and Zwenne, G.J., 2018. Exploration of Intrinsic Relevance Judgments by Legal Professionals in Information
Retrieval Systems. Anne Dirkson, Suzan Verberne, Gerard van Oortmerssen & Wessel Kraaij, p.5.
4 Thomas, S. and Thomas, S., 2018. Knowledge on ethical and legal responsibilities in the field of psychiatric nursing among staff
nurses. International Journal of Nursing Care, 6(2), pp.142-146.
5

with the issues encountered by the client organisation related with cost. The sole
responsibility of the person is to make sure that the services are being provided to the client
organisation and proper charges are being taken from them. It is a major concern to think of
because in the end it is going to provide a proper cost structure to the people who are getting
charged for the services. The calculation of cost remains to them and they often represent the
client to the court whenever cost related the clients in the court are facing issues. The cashier
is very different from it but they often are misunderstood from their job responsibility and
they are asked to make a record like the draftsman and present them to the court5. Their
responsibility is to present the cost related data to the solicitors as they work with solicitors.
The most of the times it is seen that the issues get out of control and both the above
mentioned professional have to intervene each other’s territory to get the data extracted
properly.
There is a need of understanding that they might be dealing with the proper financial aspects
but it is necessary to understand that the job role is different. The client-based information
cannot be found from the people who are working with the solicitors. The job responsibilities
in this segment needs to be clear in order to make a logical justification of the issues that are
seen in the job execution segment. The roles are different and due to less knowledge of the
people, the service providers get a wrong job responsibility to perform and it costs the entire
job execution in a negative manner.
The process of making a proper kind of alteration needs to be managed in a specific manner
so that the job execution is not hampered. The management process needs to be considered in
this segment and the services provided by the authority needs to be enriched with supremacy.
The service providers in the legal segment need to make sure that there is no divergence in
the job roles. The most appropriate approach is to have a proper knowledge of service
providing regarding a particular role. The management process should make sure that there is
a necessary gap among the service providers’ roles. The management process needs to make
sure that the issues are being nullified in a proficient manner in order to make a profitable
change in the end6. There are different cases where the service providers have managed to
5 Shura.shu.ac.uk. (2019). [online] Available at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/10826/8/10702926.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
6 Fitz-Gibbon, K., 2014. Overcoming barriers in the criminal justice system: examining the value and challenges of interviewing legal
practitioners. In Reflexivity in Criminological Research (pp. 247-258). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
6

make a logical statement and they have reported to have a better kind of services in a
proficient manner. Apart from that, there are different courts as well which operate in
different segment. The issues associated with Common Law, Civil law can be taken into
consideration, and in this segment, the service providers have to make sure that the issues are
getting nullified in a proper manner.
The regulation of the Common Laws and Civil Laws are different and in these cases, the
roles of the professional get divergent from their original expertise area. For an example, if a
legal professional from Common Law area comes to help in a case, which is related with civil
regulations, then the possibility of making error will be high. It is seen among the English
legal system that the management is becoming reluctant to the issues, which are associated
with job execution. The process of making proper kind of issue management needs
experience and the service providers get it with the help of operating in the different parts of
the legal system7. The issues need to be managed in a proper manner in order to make
justified approach. The service providers have to be more serious regarding the performance
they have to show to the other segments related to the legal system to make a proficient
change. It is quite clear that the service providers are looking forward to make their skills
polished but they have major issues associated with logical implementation of decision-
making skills.
The issues need to be sorted and in accordance with that the service providers have to make
changed in their efficiently the divergence is a common factor to be taken into account
because in the long run this is going to ensure proper and productive results. The
management process needs to make a proper kind of change in the service-providing segment
in order to take charge of the liabilities they are facing. The management of different types of
issues are associated with proper knowledge and only divergence can provide this to the
people. The legal professionals have to make sure that the issues are getting understood by
them and they are making a logical impact on the service-providing segment. The legal
professionals have to make sure that they are giving a proper service to the people and
making a logical deduction on the issues that have been introduced to them8. The lawyers are
7 Britishcouncil.org. (2019). [online] Available at: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/english-effect-report-v2.pdf [Accessed
10 Apr. 2019].
8 Hodge, P.S., 2017. Judicial Development of the Law of Contract in the United Kingdom. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 85, p.1587.
7

one of those service providers who have to make a proper kind of understanding of what is
needed to be done by the local authorities to nullify the social issues.
The lawyers have reported that they have supported difference cases by being the cost
manager as well and it is an alarming condition to the efficiency of the people. The service
providers need to think of a proper kind of understanding of the matters in order to make a
justified approach towards proficiency. The lawyers have also reported that they have worked
as arbitrator to make a justified change in the decision making process of the people. The
arbitration by the lawyers with a proper kind of knowledge is even more effective because
out of the court, they provide suggestions, which are concerned with the matters, and it gives
a logical deduction of what can happen if the plaintiff loses the case9. It is a major concern to
be taken into consideration by the people who are handling the issues.
The issues are needed to be managed in a proficient manner and in accordance with that they
have to make a proficient management to the scenario as well. The issues are important to e
analysed and the steps are important as well to make a logical deduction of the issues being
faced by the legal professionals while performing different types of stuffs. The majority of
the legal professionals are working out of their area of expertise and still getting proficient
results, which is a positive side for them10. The possibility of making a change in the system
is high and with this process, the service providers are going to make proper alterations in the
situation as well. The necessity of having an expert will be enhanced if the people who are
working in the scenario experience any types of issues. The roles and responsibilities are
stated and the legal professionals are trained for that but they are providing extra services in
most of the cases to earn more. The services for which the plaintiff is paying need to be
provided proficiently but in a diverging condition like this, the possibility of getting a proper
result is being lowered day by day.
From the above discussion, it is seen that the responsibilities are clouded and the people are
taking advantages of this divergence. This prospect of making changes are visualised and it is
important for the lawmakers to make some changes in the agreements or provide proper kind
9 Supremecourt.uk. (2019). [online] Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-180308.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
10 Judiciary.uk. (2019). [online] Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/lcj-report-2017-final.pdf [Accessed 10
Apr. 2019].
8

of training to the professionals11. There is a necessity to make proper changes to the system is
more evident and it is important to make major changes in the ambience to have a proper
kind of result. The best thing to be done by the legal professionals is to form a community
where they can discuss the issues that are being faced by them in order to comply with the
client demands. This will help in making a logical deduction of the issues to make a proper
kind of settlement with the client.
11 Pure.qub.ac.uk. (2019). [online] Available at:
https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/35860061/Implications_of_divergences_in_adult_protection_legislation.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
9

Conclusion
From the above discussion it is important to highlight that the people who are in the decision
making segment are looking forward to make changes in the system and they are getting a
proper response in the system as well. From the above discussion, it can be concluded that the
service providers have to think in a logical manner before making any kind of approach. The
decision making process needs to be enhanced and in accordance with that the professional
have to be trained. There is a need to enhance the services and in accordance to that, the
service providers have to make some modifications as well. It can be concluded that the
management of the legal professional have to make decisive changes, which are associated
with proper kind of situation management. The divergence is going to last in the system
because there is no remedy associated with increased demand. In the end, a service provider
needs to take steps that are along side with the condition.
10

Reference List
Britishcouncil.org. (2019). [online] Available at:
https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/english-effect-report-v2.pdf [Accessed 10
Apr. 2019].
Fitz-Gibbon, K., 2014. Overcoming barriers in the criminal justice system: examining the
value and challenges of interviewing legal practitioners. In Reflexivity in Criminological
Research (pp. 247-258). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Hodge, P.S., 2017. Judicial Development of the Law of Contract in the United
Kingdom. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 85, p.1587.
Judiciary.uk. (2019). [online] Available at:
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/lcj-report-2017-final.pdf [Accessed 10
Apr. 2019].
Lawsociety.org.uk. (2019). Legal professionals - who does what? - The Law Society . [online]
Available at: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/legal-professionals-who-does-
what/ [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
Pure.qub.ac.uk. (2019). [online] Available at:
https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/35860061/Implications_of_divergences_in_adult_protectio
n_legislation.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
Ritchey, K.L. and Vanek, C., Thomson Reuters Global Resources ULC, 2018. Systems,
methods, and interfaces for aggregating and providing information regarding legal
professionals. U.S. Patent 9,904,712.
Shura.shu.ac.uk. (2019). [online] Available at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/10826/8/10702926.pdf
[Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
Stuckey, R., 2017. Best practices for legal education.
Supremecourt.uk. (2019). [online] Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-
180308.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2019].
11

Thomas, S. and Thomas, S., 2018. Knowledge on ethical and legal responsibilities in the field
of psychiatric nursing among staff nurses. International Journal of Nursing Care, 6(2),
pp.142-146.
Wiggers, G., Verberne, S. and Zwenne, G.J., 2018. Exploration of Intrinsic Relevance
Judgments by Legal Professionals in Information Retrieval Systems. Anne Dirkson, Suzan
Verberne, Gerard van Oortmerssen & Wessel Kraaij, p.5.
12