This literature review, prepared for the LAW5SIN Statutory Interpretation course, delves into the multifaceted concept of ambiguity within legal texts. The review identifies and dissects three primary sources of ambiguity: semantic, syntactic, and contextual. Semantic ambiguity arises from the multiple meanings of words and phrases, while syntactic ambiguity stems from sentence structure, leading to varied interpretations. Contextual ambiguity emerges when conflicting information is present within a document. The review explores the implications of these ambiguities, acknowledging that while ambiguity can be confusing, it is not the same as vagueness and can enhance critical thinking skills. The author also discusses how ambiguity is often employed by lawyers for strategic purposes. The review concludes with a bibliography of relevant cases, journal articles, and legislation.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
