Analysis of LLP Internship: Law, Ethics, and Governance

This report provides a detailed analysis of a London Law LLP internship, covering various aspects of business law and ethics. It begins with an introduction to Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) and the context of the internship, followed by an examination of the roles of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government within the UK legal system. The report explores legal remedies, specifically focusing on limitations imposed by courts and the concept of specific performance, referencing relevant case law. It then differentiates between general partnerships and LLPs, highlighting the implications of limited liability and legal personality. Furthermore, the report discusses the legal and ethical considerations surrounding employee dismissal. The conclusion summarizes the key findings, emphasizing the interplay of legal, ethical, and governmental factors within the context of the internship. The report draws upon several academic sources to support its analysis.

LLP

Contents
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2
MAIN BODY..............................................................................................................................................3
Role of main branches of government.....................................................................................................3
Remedy of limitations imposed by courts and specific performance with reference to case law.............4
Difference between a general partnership in terms to separate limited liability and legal personality.....5
How an employee can be dismissed at law in context with ethical perspective.......................................5
CONCLUSION...........................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
A limited liability partnership is defined as a term in which all partners depending on
jurisdiction have certain limited level of liabilities. It is considered as a business structure which
provides different liability protection for all the owners in terms of potential tax breaks and
certain other benefits also (Wong, 2021).The below report is based on London law LLP
internship. In accordance with this an interview process was been conducted in which various
questions were been asked in context with department like contracts, corporate, employment and
public. An individual was asked different questions and these were roles of organs of
government in terms of the Executive, judiciary and the legislature and remedy of all limitations
which are imposed by the courts and specific performance with reference to the case law.
MAIN BODY
Role of main branches of government
 There are three key branches of administration which is a legislature, judiciary and
executive. In terms of British parliament it is the legislative organ of government which
is divided into dual parts and these are the elected House of lords and elected House of
commons. The executive organ is made up of the government machine only and is
accountable for implementing all the bills which are shaped by the parliament. In terms
of the third organ which is judiciary it is considered as the last branch of power in United
Kingdom and is made up of the court system. These people are the one who decide what
law should in applied to a specific case. In context with the branch of legislature as per
London, United Kingdom, both House of Commons and House of Lords can introduce
bills but in context with House of Lords they cannot propose a bill. The main role of
legislature is their law making functions. In earlier times, laws were either been provided
by customs, traditions or were issued by kings ( Fagetan, 2021). But as per present
situation legislature is the chief source of law. It states the overall will into laws and
perceives it as a legal character. They also play the role of transforming the demand of
people into authoritative laws. Legislature also reflects public opinions in context all
issues that are being arise. They control overall finances and without the approval of
them executive can’t spend any form of money.
 The role of executive branch of government, they have full authority and responsibility
for regular administration. Their main role is to execute and enforcement of laws. In
relation with London law and UK government the executive branch involves leaders with
the top leadership roles. There are different roles which are performed by the executive.
The most important is to maintain both law as well as order. They need to rely on an
administration staff in order to control and direct the public administration. In relation
with all military functions the executive appoints top army and allocates funds. In context
with London law, they regulate financial business of whole country in the form of setting
up a budget

 In relation with the branch of judiciary they play a very important role in British politics.
They act as a protector in accordance with all the possible excesses of both executive as
well as legislative organs. In terms of the interpretation and applications of all laws. In
context with this they all apply certain laws to specific cases (Lathif, Wijaya and Mihradi,
2021). When courts make certain decisions their interpretation of all respective laws are
done by the judiciary amounts to overall law making. The judiciary also has the role and
responsibility to safeguard the right of audiences. They play the responsibility to protect
all important rights of people.
 In context with UK, to run overall country in a calm manner all three organs play a very
important role. Legislative makes laws. The executive carriers out all laws and in context
with judiciary they assures that everyone gets justice and no law gets violated. As per the
case study of London law LLP internship, it was determined that internship was been
done in terms of commercial law and if everything gets smoothly then a training contract
can be formed ( Uchiyama, 2021). As there are different departments like public,
corporate and so on, all three organs play their respective roles and responsibilities. In
context with this Samuel also analyzed about their roles.
Remedy of limitations imposed by courts and specific performance with reference to case law
 There are various legal remedies which are considered when another party penetrated
their contractual commitment. In terms of definite performance it is considered as a
focused remedy which courts use when there is no other remedy which will reimburse the
other party. Courts enforce specific performance only if the underlying contract is fair
and equitable. Court can consider ordering specific performance as long as if anyone asks
for the remedy. In accordance with this equitable remedy orders the breaching party to
comply with overall contract? As per the case study the specific performance was that if
an individual would create good impression on all members of each department then it
may lead to training contract. Specific performance will only be awarded at that situation
where all damages which are been done would not offer an appropriate remedy to the
applicant ( Fabozzi, 2021). It has been imposed by the courts that there should be an
involvement of all necessary conditions where the loss has been incurred. There were
many limitations which were been developed in terms of London law.
 The court does not evaluate specific performance unless everything is clear in terms of
nature. With reference to limitations the courts have taken a particular restrictive
approach in order to grant specific performance orders. There are many factors on the
basis of which court imposes certain limitations in context with specific performance like
in relation with relief. In certain situation sit happens that a contract gets terminated due
to which it gives rise to a cause of action in terms of specific performance. In such cases
the terminations gets set aside. In relation with London Law, if Samuel becomes
successful then they would be able to spend some time with respect to various
departments and on the basis of it they get a sort of relief. In relation with specific

performance there are various types of remedies like in terms of valid contract, breach of
contract, damages with respect to monetary compensation and so on.
 There are many limitations which are imposed by the courts in terms of the relevant case
law as well as the legislation with respect to contracts. In context with the case study
there were certain limitations which were imposed by the government ( Jin and et.al,
2021).During the period of internship, Samuel was aware that if he creates an impression
them only further training contract would be done and at the same point of time only the
candidate who is successful would be able to spend some of their time in different
departments like in relation with corporate, contracts, public as well as employment.
Difference between a general partnership in terms to separate limited liability and legal
personality
In relation with general partnership it is defined as all profits and losses are separated
equally across all partners unless a documented contract assigns unequal distribution. In relation
with limited liability partnership they give all partners a limited input in context with all business
decisions and make the partially liable. On the basis of general partnership they are made
between two or more people who agree to share all profits and losses on equal basis. A limited
liability partnership offers more protection in context with individuals’ personal assets in the
form of limiting their liability to only the company ( Hadi and Udin, 2021). Both limited and
general partnership are considered as a form of arrangements in which individuals come together
to form a business relationship in order to carry out all business activities. All limited partners
invest a business in terms of its operations and they give a limited partner less control while in
context with general partners they used to participate in the daily business activities.
How an employee can be dismissed at law in context with ethical perspective
It is very important to use the right ways in relation with terminating all employees. They
should never get terminated for any kind of wrong reason. In context with equal employment
opportunity commission they enforce several laws against discrimination including civil rights
act and so on. There are certain factors on the basis of which employee can be dismisses. If an
employee keeps on neglecting his or her roles and responsibilities then they can be dismissed
from the organization due to which they will face lot of damage ( Ramadhani and Rahayu, 2021).
From ethical perspective there are various steps through which employee can be dismissed like
in the form of commence disciplinary action. In context with this if an employee is unable to
improve their performance then a progressive disciplinary action can be taken on the basis of
which termination of employees can be done. Consultation with employment law attorney can
also be done. In context with this all options need to be considered in advance and on the basis of
this termination should be done.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it has been concluded that there are three main organs of the
government in terms of legislature, executive and judiciary. All have their own roles and

responsibilities and on the basis of that laws are been carried further. There are many limitations
which are imposed by the government and in terms of that many contracts gets assigned. An
employee cannot be dismissed without any specific reason. So, with respect to this certain
methods gets applied on the basis of which they get terminated.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Wong, M., 2021. Tax Framework for Accessing Real Estate Asset Classes. In Understanding
China’s Real Estate Markets (pp. 127-136). Springer, Cham.
Fagetan, A.M., 2021. The Non Regulation of Hedge Funds in Offshores Jurisdictions: Cayman
Islands, British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, and Delaware. In The Regulation of Hedge Funds (pp.
283-331). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Uchiyama, T., 2021. Film and the Other Video Contents (TV program and Internet Video).
In Perspectives on the Japanese Media and Content Policies (pp. 115-144). Springer, Singapore.
Fabozzi, F.J., 2021. The basics of finance: an introduction to financial markets, business finance,
and portfolio management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jin, S and et.al, 2021. Does the belt and road initiative reshape China’s outward foreign direct
investment in ASEAN? Shifting motives of state-owned and private-owned enterprises. The
Singapore Economic Review, 66(01), pp.161-183.
Hadi, N. and Udin, U., 2021. Testing the Effectiveness of CSR Dimensions for Small Business
Entrepreneurs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), p.6.
Ramadhani, M.A. and Rahayu, E., 2021. A Shift in Corporate Social Responsibility Program to
Support Vocational Education in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(1).