Marks and Spencer: Employee Motivation and Organisational Structure

Verified

Added on  2023/01/19

|8
|570
|77
Report
AI Summary
This report provides an analysis of Marks and Spencer's approach to employee motivation, organisational structure, and leadership. It begins by outlining the benefits of employee involvement, such as increased value and better decision-making, while also acknowledging potential issues like communication complexities. The report then details various motivational strategies, including incentives, flexible working conditions, and recreational activities. The analysis considers Marks and Spencer's adoption of a flat organisational structure and reviews relevant leadership behaviors. The report concludes with a discussion of the cited references, providing context for the findings. This document is designed to help students understand the practical application of management and leadership theories within a real-world business context. This report is available on Desklib.
Document Page
ATHE ORGANISATION
BEHAVIOR
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
TABLE OF CONTENT
INTRODUCTION
TASK 3
3.1 Analyse the benefits and issues with involving employees in organisational decision making.
3.2 Explain different ways to motivate employees.
CONCLUSION.
REFERENCES.
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Marks and Spencer is British multinational which is in retail business. The company is having its
headquarter in Westminster, London. The company's founder is Michael Marks and Thomas Spencer. The
company is having the number of employee as 80000 plus. Revenue the company is having is £10000 plus.
The company is located in almost 1500 location over the world. The company was founded in the year
1884. The financial performance of the company kept on improving year on year which is really
commendable. The chairman of the company is Archie Norman.
Document Page
TASK 3
3.1 Analyse the benefits and issues with involving employees in organisational decision making.
The employees feel they are valued in the organisation(benefits)
Making accurate decision(benefits)
Blurring of the relationship between the roles of management and the employees(issues)
Complexity in communication(issues)
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
TASK 3
3.2 Explain different ways to motivate employees
Giving incentives to the employees for the good work done by the employees.
Flexibility in working conditions.
Recreational activities.
Document Page
CONCLUSION
In the conclusion all the points considered are based on taking Marks and Spencer. Here analysis of the
characteristics of different organisational structures are taken which includes Hierarchical, Matrix and
Flat structure and The Marks and Spencer follows Flat structure. Different theories of the leadership
behaviour and work relationship and interactions are demonstrated here. Also, at last the different ways
and pros and cons of motivating the employees is mentioned here
Document Page
REFERENCES
Fletcher, T.E., Carnicelli, S. and Snape, R., 2016. Leisure Studies Association: past, present and future. Brazilian Journal of Leisure Studies. 2(2).
pp.35-45.
Govender, K., 2018. The Relationship Among Leadership, Organisation Culture, and Performance in the Public Service. Advanced Science
Letters. 24(7). pp.4914-4917.
Gross, M., 2017. Planned behavior: The relationship between human thought and action. Routledge.
Hind, C. and Steyn, R., 2015. Corporate entrepreneurship-Distilling the concept. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small
Business Management. 7(1). pp.69-87.
Jena, L.K. and Pradhan, S., 2018. Conceptualizing and validating workplace belongingness scale. Journal of Organizational Change
Management, 31(2), pp.451-462.
Pantaleo, S., 2019. Creativity and elementary students' multimodal narrative representations. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,
The. 42(1). p.17.
Pasiecznik, I.W.O.N.A. And et.al., 2017. Local community e-waste awareness and behavior. Polish case study. Environment Protection
Engineering. 43(3).
Salzberg, A.C., Gough, M.Z. and Suen, I.S., 2019. Sustainable innovation behavior in restaurants. Journal of Foodservice Business
Research, 22(2), pp.167-190.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 8
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]