MBA501: Facebook Stakeholder Strategy Development and Analysis

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Facebook's stakeholder strategy development and implementation, along with a portfolio analysis of D&H Food Group. The Facebook analysis categorizes stakeholders into Swing, Defensive, Offensive, and Hold groups, offering strategic options, recommendations, and implementation strategies for each. The D&H Food Group section applies BCG, GE-McKinsey, and Synergy matrices to assess the performance of different business units (Munchy Biscuits, Pure Juice, Funville, Burgers R Us, and Home Fresh), providing recommendations for each based on their matrix classifications. The report draws upon academic sources to support its findings and provides a detailed overview of strategic management concepts in the context of real-world business scenarios.

Stakeholder Strategy Development
and Implementation
Facebook
[Student Name] – [Student Number]

Introduction
Facebook is an American online social
networking site which is founded by Mark
Zuckerberg on 4, 2004.
The headquarter of this organization is
established in Menlo park in California.

Stakeholder Analysis (summary)
Facebook has four kinds of stakeholder as it is
discussed as below:
◦Swing,
◦Defensive
◦Offensive
◦Hold

Stakeholder Analysis (summary)
There are four kinds of stakeholder named as Swing,
Defensive, Offensive, and Hold.
◦Swing stakeholder: this kinds of stakeholders have
highercompetitive threat and higher cooperative potential.
◦Defensive stakeholder: This stakeholder has lower
cooperative while higher threat of competition.
◦Offensive stakeholder: These stakeholders has lower
competitive threats while the higher competitive potential.
◦Hold stakeholder: This kind of stakeholder had lower
potential and lower competitive benefits (The Death of
Facebook, 2019).

Swing Stakeholder: strategic options
On the basis of data , It is addressed that
Facebook facilitates to make connection
between users of family and friends.
It could also facilitates to have news and
trading data (Reif ,2019).

Swing Stakeholder:
recommendations
It could also make the page and start a
collective petition for raising their issue.
It can support to comprehend the positive
and negative aspect of any issues
(Chen ,2019).

Defensive Stakeholder: strategic options
The authority of the government could
informed individual by Facebook.
It could be supportive for the people to
eliminate the probability of danger from any
situation (Ansoff, et. al., 2019).

Defensive Stakeholder: recommendations
The government could tried to address the
privacy issue of Facebook.
It could also supported to operate the
business in one direction (Ferlie and Ongaro,
2015).

Offensive Stakeholder: strategic options
The workforces are stakeholders that have
higher cooperative potential as well as less
competitive threat.
It is also addressed that employee supported
their employees at the higher level for
increasing the growth of firm (Frow, et. al.,
2016).

Offensive Stakeholder: recommendations
The organization should use the training
and development method that supported to
the employee for making an innovative
culture and support to get higher
competitive benefits (Geisler and
Wickramasinghe, 2015).

Hold Stakeholder: strategic options
This kinds of stakeholder is capable to make
higher competitive benefits. This kinds of
leader could also having the less cooperative
potentials as well as lower competitive threat
(Ginter, et. al., 2018).

Hold Stakeholder:
recommendations
Facebook could support to ads organization
for reaching at the huge number of
consumers.
It could lead to finds the ways by which
organization will address different methods
which could support to get higher competitive
advantages (Karuppan, et. al., 2016).