MCAST Inclusive Education: Exploring Cognitive and Behavioral Learning

This assignment delves into the contrasting aspects of behaviorism and cognitive learning models, highlighting their differences and interrelations. It emphasizes the importance of empathy as a crucial schema domain for educators. The analysis extends to Kolb's learning theories in the context of classroom scenarios and evaluates various teaching techniques, advocating for a multidimensional approach that integrates cognitive and behavioral interventions. The assignment further explores the concept of learning through self-made concepts and its potential flaws. It concludes by examining the techniques employed by different instructors, emphasizing the significance of connecting textbook knowledge with practical experience and incorporating social learning methods for improved educational outcomes. Desklib offers a wealth of similar resources for students seeking academic support.

Name

Question 1
(a)
Behaviorism is an extrinsic method of the learning where an individual responds to the
stimuli's coming from the side of the external environment. The stimulus has the potential to
change the behavior of the subject and affect the learning curve. A cognitive model of
learning, on the other hand, is an intrinsic model where the subject recalls a particular
memory and act in accordance with that. He treats it as a role model (Mclead, 2017).
(b)
The difference between Cognitive and behavioral learning
Cognitive learning is more about observations that an individual is making during the course
of the events. Behavioral learning is an outcome of an act or a reaction to any of the
stimulants that are present in the external environment (Weegar, 2012). Cognitive learning is
natural teachers or even the subject does not have control over it. Behavioral learning, on the
other hand, is a method where concepts like trial and error play a major role and a teacher can
control the learning curve of a kid (Clark, 2012). Classroom learning is behavioral learning,
practicing the dance moves of a cartoon character after looking at it on a TV screen is an
example of Cognitive learning.
Relations between Cognitive and behavioral learning
Discovery, reinforcement and critical assimilation of the events form the key factors of both
types of learning processes. The process of exploring during behavioral learning can add a
new dimension to the knowledge gained through a cognitive means (George, 2005 ).
Behavioral learning is dependent on the reinforcement of the events and knowledge;

sometimes cognitive senses can also cause this reinforcement. Critical assimilation is another
factor which is applicable in both types of leanings (Taggart, 2017).
Question 2
Five broad schema domains are Safety, stability in the environment, feeling of nurturance,
empathy, feelings, and respect. Empathy in my views is the most important factor, learners
are ignorant. As a teacher looking after behavioral patterns of a learner, empathy is the most
demanding field. It demands a teacher to quickly understand the mindset of the learner and
react accordingly (Kaplan, 2018).
Empathy demands the constant attention of the teacher and allows him to experiment with the
prescribed curriculum or teaching methods. Sometimes it allows him to experiment with the
course material and tweak a few things to create adaptability in the topic and the method of
the teaching. When we check all the five broad schema domains then empathy comes out as
the most difficult domain to practice. Rest of the other domains can be considered as
stationary domains whereas the domain of empathy is variable in nature (Nebal, 2017).
Question 3
(a)
In the above-mentioned video we can identify two major aspects of learning theories as
described by Kolb, first is related to the instigation of the correct behavior. As we can see that
in the video a kid is throwing tantrums. He is expressing anger by throwing away objects. We
should not eat food once it is spilled on the floor is the main lesson. In the present video, the
teacher failed in understanding the plea of the kid, his aggressive behavior is an outcome of
the fact that the teacher failed in fulfilling his demand. Ideally, the teacher or the caretaker
should adopt two strategies. She should try to involve kid a cognitive learning behavior

where he should tell him about other kids are eating peaches because they are eating it from
the plates and not from the floor. An alimentation from the main group is a wrong response
(Guneya, 2012). The framework of Kolb defines Social constructivism as an important
learning technique. The theory of punishment and rewards clubbed together with social
constructivism can be the answer to this situation.
Question 4
(a)
Most of the instructors are promoting the concept of learning it through “self-made
concepts.” One of the flaws in this theory is related to the formation of wrong concepts,
wrong concepts may lead to the formation of the difficulties that can become a hurdle.
However, once they pass this hurdle, the learning becomes an integral part of the memory of
the learners. Most of the instructors in the given video are using this technique to the great
impact.
(b)
The technique of Gary Williams where he connects the textbook thoughts with practical
experience increases the spectrum of learning for the kids in multiple ways. It allows them to
focus on single information from multiple viewpoints. Zoe Daniels studies her class well on
the merit of the IQ and then plans a one-on-one interaction with the students. Julie Port
follows the traditional structure of answer first question later technique where she gives away
an interesting solution to the kids and then discusses the problems associated with it. Miriam
Torres adopts the technique of group teaching where social cognitive learning plays a crucial
role.
(C)

All the four participants mentioned in the previous answer cover a multidimensional
approach towards cognitive learning by adding a pinch of behavioral interventions to ensure a
smooth learning curve. The method adopted by Julie Port can be improved by adding some
tricks from the framework of social learning methods. She can also adopt the technique of
role-playing, in the group to bring out better results from the exercise.

Bibliography
Clark, K. (2012). Learning Theories. Radiological Technology, (Online), Available at:
(http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/90/2/172.extract. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)
George, S. (2005 ). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. E-learning Library, (Online),
Available at http://er.dut.ac.za/handle/123456789/69. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)
Guneya, A. (2012). Effective learning environments in relation to different learning. Procedia ,
(Online), Available at: https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042812016096/1-s2.0-S1877042812016096-
main.pdf?_tid=dfa69be8-edcc-433c-b095-
b4e69cc661e6&acdnat=1549466623_0906d1f68a4833aefb7fed330efab02d. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)
Kaplan, D. (2018). Behaviorism in Online Teacher Training. Scientific Publisher, (Online), Available
at:https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=83687.
Mclead, S. (2017). Behaviorist Approach. Simply Psychology, (Online), Available
at:https://www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)
Nebal, C. (2017). Behaviorism in the Classroom. The learning Scientist, (Online), Available
at:http://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2017/8/10-1. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)
Taggart, E. (2017). Pavlov, Watson, and Skinner on Behaviorist Theory. Sophia, (Online), Available
at:https://www.sophia.org/tutorials/pavlov-watson-and-skinner-on-behaviorist-theory. (Accessed:
5-2-2019)
Weegar, M. (2012). A Comparison of Two Theories of Learning Behaviorism and Constructivism as
applied to Face-to-Face and Online Learning. E-Leader Manila, (Online), Available at:https://www.g-
casa.com/conferences/manila/papers/Weegar.pdf. (Accessed: 5-2-2019)