ECH020N226S: Research Proposal Methodology Peer Review - University

This document presents a peer review of a research proposal's methodology section. The review assesses the clarity, appropriateness, and suitability of the research design, including the theoretical framework, sample selection, data collection methods, and ethical considerations. The reviewer provides comments and suggestions for improvement, while the author reflects on the feedback received. Specific attention is given to the use of academic literature and the accuracy of referencing. The document includes the module code ECH020N226S and relates to a BA Early Childhood Studies program. Desklib offers a platform for students to access similar research materials and solved assignments.

Running head: PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
Peer Review Form for Methodology
Name of the University:
Name of the Student:
Author Note:

1PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
Criteria Reviewer comments
(including guidance for
improvement)
My reflections on the
reviewer comments
A general overview: Is the
research to date clear and
presented appropriately?
Do you think the length is
appropriate at this point?
Is the information presented in
a suitable fashion that some
understanding can be given?
The length of the research is
appropriate. It consists of 3000
words and the topic is being
clearly addressed, along with
proper citations and references.
The information is being
presented in a suitable fashion
along with correct citations.
Please comment on the
content of the research to date
 Explains the theoretical
framework underlying
your assumption of our
social worlds and discuss
the relevance of a
qualitative/quantitative/m
ixed approach to your
own study.
 Selection of
samples/participants:
describe how many
people are to take part in
your study, their
For the research, the
information will be collected
from various sources, which
includes both primary as well
as secondary data sources.
Starting from the beginning the
primary data has been collected
from various sources such as
surveys, questionnaires and
observations. In addition to
these form of sources, the
secondary sources are also
there, which consists of the
information that are
particularly available on the

2PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
backgrounds if
appropriate and the
reasons for selecting
them
 Choice of data collection
methods to be discussed:
justify what data
collection methods are to
be used and describe how
you are going to employ
the methods in your
study.
internet or online sources.
Moreover, both the types of
data are used for conducting
this study. The primary sources
such as surveys, questionnaires
and observations will help the
researcher in gaining huge
personal knowledgeable
insights.
Please comment on the
research to date
 Ethical considerations and
implications: critically
review ethical principles,
scrutinize the ethical
issues involved in
conducting own study,
and identify implications
for research with young
children
I have maintained the
professionals and ethical
issues, while conducting the
entire research work. I did not
leak any sort of personal
information or details of the
survey respondents, without
their consent. I was sure about
the facts that are being
collected from the primary as
well as secondary sources.
Fabrication of any information
or facts is highly unethical and
I have strictly avoided.
Moreover, I took prior consent
from all the respondents
regarding personal information

3PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
for the whole research
procedure.
Please comment specifically
on the use made of academic
literature / references
sourced
Do you feel the literature
referred to is appropriately
academic and links made?
Please comment on the
accuracy of referencing
The literatures are being
reviewed and cited
appropriately. The referencing
style is Harvard.