Assessing and Measuring Healthcare Professional Performance Methods

This report examines various methods for monitoring the performance of healthcare professionals, emphasizing the importance of assessing their effectiveness to ensure patient safety and well-being. The report details five key assessment methods: regulatory inspections, consumer surveys, third-party assessments, and statistical indicators. Regulatory inspections, often conducted by statutory inspectorates, ensure adherence to health and safety standards. Surveys of consumer experiences offer insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of care. Third-party assessments, such as ISO 9000 standards and accreditation programs, evaluate compliance with established benchmarks. Statistical indicators provide data-driven insights into performance, identifying areas for improvement. The report also highlights the significance of internal assessments, such as professional development and colleague relations, in evaluating a healthcare professional's overall performance and impact on health outcomes. The report concludes by underscoring the complexity of assessing performance due to the collaborative nature of healthcare and highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation to maintain high standards of care.

Running Head: MEDICAL
0
Medical
10/23/2018

MEDICAL
1
Ways to monitor the performance of health care professionals
Performance in any system, here healthcare is defined as the reflection of values in relation to
the explicit goals of the various stakeholders, such as patients, consumers, doctors,
professionals, insurers and regulators. Assessing and measuring the performance of health
professionals or doctors in the healthcare settings is essential along with the assessment of
patient’s health improvement. As the health professionals are responsible for the effective
delivery of health services leading to the patient safety and wellbeing, therefore they must be
assessed carefully for their profession (Kieft et al., 2014). There are five different types of
methods of assessing and measuring the performance of health professionals or hospital
performance.
 Regulatory inspection- In many countries there are some of the statutory inspectorates
to monitor the performance of the hospitals that means assessing the effectiveness of
doctors or health professionals. As some countries, have specialisations to implement
infection control and blood transfusions. These inspections standards have some of
the legal authority, which every hospital has to follow in order to ensure effectiveness
of their services. Licensing inspection is initiated in the countries like United States,
for the new hospitals, which ensures or confirms and measures the performance of the
hospitals or healthcare in terms of fulfilment of the minimal requirements for the
health and safety of the patients or consumers (Tsai et al., 2015).
 Surveys of consumer’s experience - Standardized surveys of the patients and their
family members in the hospitals are the reliable indicators of the performance
measurement of the doctors or health professionals in the healthcare. Through
surveys, it has been analysed that the hospitals or health professionals are focused
towards acquiring health education and patient empowerment, comfort, complaint
mechanisms and continuity of care and patients wellbeing. Advantages to use this
method is that from the patients survey and experience is that it becomes easy to
assess and monitor the healthcare performance, as they describe about the outcomes
of attaining health services (Fernandes et al., 2015).
 Third-party assessments – Some third-party assessments are the other tools utilised to
monitor the performance of health professionals, includes ISO 9000 standards, peer-
review, accreditation programmes measures the performance of the health
professionals and hospitals, in terms of the compliance with the published standards.

MEDICAL
2
ALPHA principles programmes are some other methods to assess quality of
healthcare, thus valuating performance of health professionals is used especially in the
healthcare of Europe (Plebani and Sciacovelli, 2017).
 Statistical indicators – The use of statistical indicators, suggest the issues of
performance evaluation and management of the health professionals in the healthcare. These
are the indicators, which assess the performance of the health professionals either internally
or externally, and represent accessible, and fairly economical & potential standard, and non-
invasive methods of evaluating performance. The raw data of the hospital is measured which
evaluates and identifies the factors of effective working of the doctors or nurses in the
hospitals and identify if there are any variations from the expected performance standards
(Kontopantelis et al., 2014).
Measuring a doctor or health professional performance is a complex activity, because they
work with other specialists, nurses and many other people in the healthcare. Therefore, there
are some of the other key indicators of their effective or poor performance such as
professional development of the health professionals, Colleague relations, participation of the
doctors in the practice goals and improvements, and engaging themselves in other
professional activities or programmes. Hence, these are some of the self-evaluation areas or
methods, also referred to as ‘internal assessment’, which facilitates assessing the performance
of the health professionals in the healthcare to monitor the impact affecting the health
outcomes (Busse, Aboneh and Tefera, 2014).
.

MEDICAL
3
References
Busse, H., Aboneh, E.A. and Tefera, G. (2014) Learning from developing countries in
strengthening health systems: an evaluation of personal and professional impact among
global health volunteers at Addis Ababa University’s Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital
(Ethiopia). Globalization and health, 10(1), p.64.
Fernandes, O., Gorman, S.K., Slavik, R.S., Semchuk, W.M., Shalansky, S., Bussières, J.F.,
Doucette, D., Bannerman, H., Lo, J., Shukla, S. and Chan, W.W. (2015) Development of
clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital pharmacists using a modified
Delphi approach. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 49(6), pp. 656-669.
Kieft, R.A., de Brouwer, B.B., Francke, A.L. and Delnoij, D.M. (2014) How nurses and their
work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study. BMC
health services research, 14(1), p. 249.
Kontopantelis, E., Springate, D., Reeves, D., Ashcroft, D.M., Valderas, J.M. and Doran, T.
(2014) Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice
performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. Bmj, 348, pg. 330.
Plebani, M. and Sciacovelli, L. (2017) ISO 15189 accreditation: navigation between quality
management and patient safety. Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 36(3), pp. 225-230.
Tsai, T.C., Jha, A.K., Gawande, A.A., Huckman, R.S., Bloom, N. and Sadun, R. (2015)
Hospital board and management practices are strongly related to hospital performance on
clinical quality metrics. Health Affairs, 34(8), pp. 1304-1311.