MGMT6012: Self-Assessment Report: Management Perspectives Analysis

This report presents a detailed self-assessment based on the Gallup test findings, SWOT analysis, diversity analysis, and organizational fit. It begins with an introduction outlining the report's focus on self-assessment, incorporating elements like responsibility, harmony, and consistency. The research methodology describes the use of the Gallup Test Finder, SWOT analysis, and adaptability analysis. The SWOT analysis reveals strengths (psychological ownership, trust, problem-solving), weaknesses (multi-tasking, lack of proper selection), opportunities (career development), and threats (overconfidence). Diversity and adaptability are also analyzed, highlighting the person's time-keeping ability and ability to deliver promises. Organizational fit is evaluated by selecting the Coca-Cola Company, aligning with the company's ethical culture and community engagement. The report concludes with a summary of the self-assessment's insights and its importance in understanding the individual's strengths and capabilities.

Running head: MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Management Perspectives
Name of the student
Name of the University
Author Note:

2
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Research Methodology...............................................................................................................3
SWOT Analysis.........................................................................................................................5
Diversity.....................................................................................................................................7
Organizational Fit.......................................................................................................................7
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................8
References and Bibliography...................................................................................................10

3
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Introduction
The following report is basically based on the self-assessment of a person based on
the elements of the Gallup test finder. The report is basically a self-assessment of a person
based on a number of different elements. The self-assessment report has been based on
elements like responsibility, restorative, harmony, consistency as well as the capability of the
person as an includer. The Gallup test findings and the findings based on the different kinds
of the self-assessment analysis has been one of the major elements of the report. The report
provides a proper SWOT analysis for analysing the self-assessment report (Anthony, 2016).
The SWOT Analysis report has identified the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities as well as
the different kinds of the threats that helps to analyse the capabilities of a person in the most
proper and efficient manner. The providence of the Diversity analysis has further made the
report more compact in nature. The link up of the report with the first assessment has been
done through the analysis of the strategic fit within the organization (Hutsebaut, Feenstra &
Kamphuis 2016). The analysis of the strategic adaption to the organization for the person has
also been one of the major perspectives of the following report. The report has thus provided
a proper analysis of the self-assessment which is one of the most modern trends followed in
today’s professional circumstances. The self-assessment has helped the person to understand
the capabilities and analyse the organizational adaptation prowess in an established company.
Research Methodology
The methodology chapter of the research design is one of the most important elements
of the success of a report. The methodology chapter here has included the different tools and
analysis test that has been used in these self-reflective assessment report that has been used to
analyse the report and present the best results (Byham, 2010). The self-reflective assessment
report has been generally based on some clear and transparent findings that have been helpful

4
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
for the management of the business to answer the different questions in a proper and effective
manner. The most important part of the assessment lies on the fact that the methodology has
been selected based on the different kinds of the elements like The Gallup Test, self-
assessment analysis, SWOT test and test on the adaptability of the person in the company.
The methodologies of the study is crucial to the success of the research in the most proper
manner.
Gallup Test Finder- The gallop test finder is basically a self-help test that is conducted in
order to find out the different strengths of the person. The personal assessment of a person
helps to outline the strength of the individuals. Apart from this the gallop test finder is also
important for the individuals to assess their individual weakness and accordingly take the
necessary steps or implement the best strategies that are really helpful for the success of the
person. The identification of the individual strengths and the inner strengths of the person
will also help in the assessment of the person in the most successful manner. The proper
assessment of the person helps the person to develop himself both personally as well as
professionally.
SWOT Test- The SWOT test is basically an internal analysis of the person. The internal
analysis of the person will involve the analysis of the different kinds of the strengths and
weaknesses of the individual. The strength and weaknesses of the individual will help the
person to identify the advantages and the disadvantages in his own characteristics. The
presentation of the different kinds of the strengths and weaknesses of a person is highly
necessary for the success of the person (Byham, 2010). The SWOT analysis of the person
also paves the way for the person to identify the possible opportunities and threats that may
arise in the future. The identification of the proper threats and opportunities helps the person
to select the right strategy in life and analyse the strategy in the most efficient manner to

5
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
ensure professional success. The professional success of the person is highly important for his
professional development.
Diversity and Adaptability analysis- The diversity analysis along with the adaptability
analysis has been an additional presentation in this particular report as because the diversity
analysis and the adaption of the person in the company according to his own strengths and
professional capabilities is something to research on (Krueger Jr & Dickson, 1994). The
presentation of the different such research forms and the analysis of the adaption capabilities
of a person has further boosted the scope and prospects of the self-assessment report.
SWOT Analysis
As mentioned earlier, the strengths analysis and the presentation of the SWOT
analysis is one of the major findings from the following SWOT self-assessment report. My
SWOT Analysis report results are mostly based on the results of the Gallop Test Finder. The
report has been presented both in a tabular form as well as in a discussion form for all the
different perspectives of SWOT Analysis. The SWOT Analysis has been presented below;
STRENGTH OPPORTUNITIES
 Capability to take up psychological
ownership
 The trust of people towards me
 Selective in nature
 Love and ability to solve the problems
 Harmonious in nature
 Being consistent
 Opportunity to develop my professional
career
 Opportunity to ensure people holding
different viewpoints
 The presence of the trust for me among the
employees
WEAKNESSESS THREATS
 Willingness to be multi-tasking
 Absence of proper excuses and apologies
 Threat from overconfidence
 Threat from taking too many tasks

6
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
 The choice of specific kinds of problems
 The absence of proper modification of
objectives
 The absence of a proper form of accepting
the results
Strength- My inner strengths which were till now hidden to me has been revealed from the
different kinds of the Gallup strength finder. The Gallup Strength finder has presented a clear
picture of my characteristic and strengths. I was mostly unaware of these different kinds of
the strengths as I had some altogether different idea. First of all I have the capability to take
up psychological ownership which is one of the most important aspects of my nature.
Secondly I am capable of earning the trust of others as because people have immense trust in
me as they believe that I have the capability to take up strong leadership and responsible roles
and guide the other people in the right direction. I also have the strength of solving different
problems in a much easier manner. The solving of the different business problems in the
easiest manner is one of the toughest duties to ensure the success of a person. Apart from this
being harmonious, consistent and selective in nature helps me to address all the different
issues and address all the different kinds of the problems in an extensive manner.
Weaknesses- My biggest weakness is to be lacking the power of proper selection. I basically
fail to understand my limit and try to be multi-tasking in nature. However, I am not able to be
multitasking as I do not have that capability in me. The absence of proper excuses and
apologies is another major source of problem that continues to bother me. The absence of the
proper modification process and my choice to solve the already solved problems once again
is one of the largest weaknesses in my professional life. This weaknesses directly threatens to
demote my professional career.
Opportunities- The tests have also provided a number of different opportunities to me as
these opportunities has been my major strength. The opportunities can help me to improve

7
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
my weaknesses points and achieve for more success. I must ensure that I follow a different
perspective to utilize the opportunities and also ensure the success of my career in a proper
and efficient manner. My biggest opportunity lies in the trust shown by the people. I must
utilize this trust and ensure my success.
Threats- My weakness has invited a large number of threats that needs to be measured and
mitigated in a systematic way. The very first threat is my overconfidence. Too much
overconfidence has often led me to take a large number of tasks that I am unable to complete
in time. Apart from this I have also failed to implement the results of the study in a proper
manner. This has seriously been my threats and it has an adverse impact upon my
professional development.
Diversity
Apart from the SWOT analysis my High 5 results can also be considered to be one of
the most efficient test results that can help me to develop myself as a successful business
professional in the future. At the very beginning it has been assessed that I am a time keeper
and does all the work within the deadlines. Secondly I do not fail to deliver the promises
which can be linked to the SWOT result as because the SWOT result clearly suggest the trust
kept by others on me. This trust has been attained by means of delivering all the different
promises and also acting as a mentor for others. The High 5 results clearly suggest the
following as I can be easily trusted by others and I have the capability to mentor others. This
apart the emotional test results have also been one of the best in nature as because it has
helped me to answer the different kinds of self-related questions. First of all the presence of a
self-awareness and the presence of the self-management nature has helped me to achieve
different results which has been one of the best for me. The presence of the different other
results that includes the likes of the self-management and social awareness has also been one

8
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
of my positives. The SWOT result thus clearly links with these results and proves my inner
strength and capabilities.
Organizational Fit
The Coca-Cola Company can be justified as the best selection for me. There are a
number of different reasons behind such a selection. First of all the business perspectives of
the Coca-Cola Company totally matches with the research as because the company uses the
stance that is used in the modern world and also suits to my own career development stance
of developing in a capitalism mind-set and also the development of the organization in a
proper manner. The most important element among the business organization is the presence
of a proper ethical culture that completely matches with my ideals. The company has a great
sense of responsibility and runs their operations in a smooth manner. The presence of the
sense of the responsibility is something that I have in me. The fact that the company will be
able to provide me the environment where I can be more responsible helps me to adopt to the
situation in a more composite manner. Though there have been some major ethical issues for
the company in terms of the products, the company being a well-known face in the beverage
industry helps in the presentation of the best workplace to employees. Lastly the engagement
of the organization in the community also adds up as another major reason for my selection
of the company.
Conclusion
The following report has been one of the major source of self-assessment that has
been addressed to answer the different perspectives related to the proper analysis of the inner
strengths and capabilities of a person and also the analysis of the solutions in a proper and
efficient manner. The understanding of the capabilities and my inner strength have provided
me the perfect opportunity to address all kinds of the different issues that I was unaware of.

9
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
The feedback from the other people, the different kinds of results from the different tests has
been key to my success. The analysis of the results along with the analysis of the different
hidden characteristics has been an eye opener for me. The different personal and professional
characteristics along with the presence of the different kinds of the results from personality
tests has helped me to analyse myself in a much better and improved manner. All of the
activities and my capabilities that has been identified here from the conduction of the
different tests has helped me to address the different issues in a proper and efficient manner.
The address of the issues has thus helped me to apply the strengths in a much better and
commercially feasible manner.

10
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
References and Bibliography
Anthony, I. (2016). SWOT self-analysis: Student assessment and monitoring. Nurse
educator, 41(3), 138.
Balick, A. (2018). The psychodynamics of social networking: Connected-up instantaneous
culture and the self. Routledge.
Byham, W. C. (2010). Business networking can be taught. T+ D, 64(5), 64-68.Helle, A. C.,
Trull, T.
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow,
C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified
perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 26(5), 597-608.
Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and Preliminary
Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of
the DSM–5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-
BF). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 192.
J., Widiger, T. A., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2017). Utilizing interview and self-report
assessment of the Five-Factor Model to examine convergence with the alternative
model for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and
Treatment, 8(3), 247.
Krueger Jr, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking:
Perceived self‐efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385-
400.

11
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. C. (2018). Bridging theory and practice of impact
evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT
analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 351-365.
Lemieux, V. L. (2017). Blockchain recordkeeping: a SWOT analysis. Information
Management, 51(6), 20-27.
Li, N., & Hopfgartner, F. (2016). To log or not to log? SWOT analysis of self-tracking.
In Lifelogging (pp. 305-325). Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
Merten, T., Merckelbach, H., Giger, P., & Stevens, A. (2016). The Self-Report Symptom
Inventory (SRSI): A new instrument for the assessment of distorted symptom
endorsement. Psychological injury and law, 9(2), 102-111.
Park, S. H., Kim, D. J., & Kim, S. W. (2016). Investigating the impact resistance of ultra-
high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete using an improved strain energy impact
test machine. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 145-159.
Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis
based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194-
203.
Robbins, J. B., & Sarkany, D. (2017). Self-study: practical tips for a successful and rewarding
experience. Academic radiology, 24(6), 721-724.
Rode, J., & Brown, K. (2019). Emotional Intelligence Relates to NCLEX and Standardized
Readiness Test: A Pilot Study. Nurse educator, 44(3), 154-158.
Selke, S. (Ed.). (2016). Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and Lifelogging-between disruptive
technology and cultural transformation. Springer.

12
MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Sellbom, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Fowler, K. A., & McCrary, K. L. (2018). The self-report
assessment of psychopathy: Challenges, pitfalls, and promises.
Stirratt, M. J., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Crane, H. M., Simoni, J. M., Czajkowski, S., Hilliard, M.
E., ... & Ogedegbe, G. (2015). Self-report measures of medication adherence
behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Translational behavioral medicine, 5(4),
470-482.
Thomas, J. M., Higgs, S., & Dourish, C. T. (2016). Test–retest reliability and effects of
repeated testing and satiety on performance of an Emotional Test Battery. Journal of
clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 38(4), 416-433.
Williams, P. G., Rau, H. K., Suchy, Y., Thorgusen, S. R., & Smith, T. W. (2017). On the
validity of self-report assessment of cognitive abilities: Attentional control scale
associations with cognitive performance, emotional adjustment, and
personality. Psychological assessment, 29(5), 519.