University MGT502 Assessment 1B Report: Team Performance Analysis

This report provides a critical analysis of team development and performance, focusing on the influence of communication, organizational learning, and globalization. The author examines existing research, including articles by Eisenberg, Post, and DiTomaso (2019), and Schaubroeck et al. (2016), highlighting the importance of communication in team dynamics. The report argues that contemporary factors such as globalization significantly impact team culture and performance, and that existing studies sometimes omit these crucial elements. The analysis also references Crane and Matten (2016) to underscore the changing landscape of business due to globalization. The report concludes by emphasizing the need to consider contemporary issues when evaluating team performance and organizational learning, and the limitations of existing studies which do not always address these factors.

Running head: MANAGEMENT
Management
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

2MANAGEMENT
Introduction
This research report stands a critical argument regarding the annotated discussion
presented in Assessment 1A in terms of team development and learning, team
communication and educational diversity in the team performance. The critical analysis has
been established by adding other supporting materials. It can be mentioned that discussion in
the existing papers lack the fact that dynamic environment has a strongly impact on team
culture and performance.
Analysis
An article on Team Dispersion and Performance by Eisenberg, Post and DiTomaso
(2019) has mentioned that communication could strongly affect team performance but the
paper lacks discussion about how and why communication required in a team work and how
dynamic market environment creating the necessity for communication. On the other side,
another study performed by Schaubroeck et al. (2016) team learning is required to promote
communication and apply communication, but the scholars of this study did not mention
about the major factor how organizational learning has changed and how globalization has
influence the process of organizational learning. In response to this statement, Crane and
Matten (2016) mentioned that due to rapid dissemination of globalization trend across the
business have changed the ways and trends of business across the world.
Conclusion
The argument helps to observe the fact that existing studies have mentioned about the
team learning and opportunities but the facts provided in the studies omitted the
contemporary facts about team learning and globalisation. Argument helps to state that facts

3MANAGEMENT
related to team performance are not related the contemporary issues of performance
management.

4MANAGEMENT
References
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and
sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Eisenberg, J., Post, C., & DiTomaso, N. (2019). Team Dispersion and Performance: The Role
of Team Communication and Transformational Leadership. Small Group Research,
1046496419827376. Retrieved from
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1046496419827376
Schaubroeck, J., Carmeli, A., Bhatia, S., & Paz, E. (2016). Enabling team learning when
members are prone to contentious communication: The role of team leader
coaching. human relations, 69(8), 1709-1727. Retrieved from
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0018726715622673