MGT601 Dynamic Leadership: Self-Reflection on Gallup StrengthsFinder

Verified

Added on  2023/06/03

|4
|889
|134
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a self-reflective analysis of the author's leadership strengths as identified by the Gallup StrengthsFinder assessment and the MBTI test. The author discusses the results of the Gallup StrengthsFinder, highlighting five key strengths: being deliberative, an achiever, an activator, commanding, and strategic. Each strength is explored in the context of leadership, with the author reflecting on how these attributes can be leveraged to effectively lead and motivate a team. The report connects these strengths to the author's personal experiences and aspirations, demonstrating a commitment to self-awareness and continuous improvement as a leader. The MBTI test result of ENTJ, aligning with the 'commander' archetype, further reinforces the author's self-perception as a natural leader. The author aims to use these insights to enhance their leadership capabilities and positively influence their team.
Document Page
Dynamic Leadership
Gallup’s report
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Gallup’s strengths finder test analysis
Leadership has always been an important element of my personality. Throughout my life, I
have had several leadership opportunities which have shaped this aspect of my life.
Gallup’s strength finder is a reflection tool that has helped me in identifying my strengths
as a leader and become self -aware (Arriaza, 2015).
I also went and undertook MBTI test, which is another introspective self- report
questionnaire and helps to understand how people perceive the world around them and
take their decision (Caldwell & Hayes, 2016). My personality finder here has been ENTJ,
which puts me in the category of born leader or the commander. Commander is my
strength in the Gallup test as well; hence I can say that the sync in the result of the two tests
just reflects that I took the test seriously to become self- aware which would help me in
becoming a better leader in future.
The first strength of mine as identified by the test is being deliberative. This suggests that I
am careful and critical. I try to identify the risks before proceeding a project and accept
them. I completely agree with this analysis because even in my personal life I tend to work
upon identifying what might go wrong. Being able to identify risks associated with a project
is an essential aspect of being a good leader (Mendoza et. al., 2016). Hence I believe this
strength will help me lead my team better.
The second strength was being an achiever. This theme helped me in identifying my drive
to achieve. I do feel this constant need for achievement. I could entirely relate with this as I
continue to feel the need to achieve on an everyday basis. A leader must lead by example
(Shamir & Eilam-Shamir, 2018). Therefore I hope as a leader I would be able to instil the
same drive in my team and motivate them to the best of my abilities.
The third strength identified was that I am an activator. I believe this strength of mine
would be most useful in my endeavours as a leader. This suggests that I am impatient for
action. I need to keep things moving and understand how and when the work needs to be
done. I try to focus on what can be done now. I certainly hope to ensure that I can
Document Page
channelize this strength in the right way within a team. As a leader it is important to take
responsibility and be an activator.
The fourth strength is command. This suggests that I tend to take charge and I feel no
discomfort in imposing my views on others. I agree with this to the extent that I notice this
even in my personal life. Once I form an opinion I definitely feel the need to share it with
others. One of the most important roles of a leader is to motivate others (Matthews, 2015).
This attribute of mine would help me in motivating my team towards taking risks and
putting their best foot forward.
The last but not the least strength as identified by the test was that I am strategic in nature.
This attribute of my personality focuses on my thought process which is rather distinct. I
try to analyze the situation to the best of my ability and find the best route. Leaders must
be strategic in their thought process so that their team can take a calculated risk (Antonakis
& Day, 2017). Hence, I believe this ability of mine like rest others will help me in my
leadership journey.
Document Page
References
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (Eds.). (2017).
The nature of leadership. Sage publications. United
States.
Matthews, J. B. (2015). Leadership Traits: Are People Born to Lead?. In
Leadership in
Surgery (pp. 59-66). Springer, Cham. United Kingdom.
Mendoza, L. R., Orea-Amador, L., & Kendall, M. R. (2016). Mixed Method Study of the
Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leadership Experience. In
Proceedings of
the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition.
Shamir, B., & Eilam-Shamir, G. (2018). “What’s your story?” A life-stories approach to
authentic leadership development. In
Leadership Now: Reflections on the Legacy of
Boas Shamir(pp. 51-76). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Arriaza, G. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis and Leadership.
Educational Leadership and
Administration: Teaching and Program Development,
26, 1-3.
Caldwell, C., & Hayes, L. A. (2016). Self-efficacy and self-awareness: moral insights to
increased leader effectiveness.
Journal of Management Development,
35(9), 1163-
1173.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]