Detailed Analysis of Migration Law and Mr. Karan's Court Case

This case study analyzes a migration law case involving Mr. Karan, who sought to remain in Australia despite visa restrictions. The document examines the application of the Migration Regulation Act, specifically condition 8503, which prohibits further visa applications for those entering on visitor visas. It explores the relevance of Section 41 of the Migration Act 1958, and the role of the Minister's discretion under subdivision 2A and provision 2.05. Mr. Karan's application for a partner visa was initially rejected, leading to appeals and court proceedings where the court scrutinized the Minister's decision-making process, particularly the consideration of relevant evidence, including his wife's mental health concerns. The court issued orders for a review of the case, utilizing legal interpretation principles, including examining prior case law, emphasizing fair decision-making. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering all evidence presented and the potential impact of immigration decisions on individuals and families. The case provides a detailed example of how Australian migration law operates and how the courts interpret and apply its provisions.

RUNING HEAD: - Migration law and cases 0 | P a g e
MIGRAtion act and case analysis
[Document subtitle]

Migration law and cases 1 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Provision and regulation:.............................................................................................................................2
1. Migration regulation act to the 8503 conditions of the eighth schedule:..............................................2
2. Migration act, 1958 to the 41 section:..................................................................................................2
3. Case scenario:......................................................................................................................................3
4. Order by the Court:..............................................................................................................................4
5. The legal interpretation:.......................................................................................................................4
6. REFERENCES:...................................................................................................................................6

Migration law and cases 2 | P a g e
Provision and regulation:
The stated case is pertinent to an individual who is willing to stay in Australia but under the
provision of Migration Regulation act, 1994 and tight policies regarding immigration, the
individual is not permitted to stay in Australia in future as he came to the respective place by
visitor's visa under 8503 conditions of the eighth schedule hence, prohibiting him from applying
for a further visa while he lives in Australia. Moreover, the provision and the regulations as
stated in the case are as followed. Nonetheless, in context with the legal visa compliance,
implication of the subdivision 2A and minister of Australia in context with the refrain an
individual regarding visitor's reasons ordered under 2.05 provisions for the appeals in writing
regarding grant of visa has also be undertaken.
1. Migration regulation act to the 8503 conditions of the eighth schedule:
Under the 8503 conditions of the eighth schedule, an individual who set foot into the
Australian’s territory is prohibited for applying to further visa while saying in the Australian
country. Although, an individual is granted to apply for visa security if needed1. Therefore, as per
the provision of the Migration act the individual names, Mr. Karan is prohibited from applying to
partner visa including any visas in the Australian country. Therefore, it is considered that the
migration law and conditions set in the immigration needs to be satisfied for the visa. However,
various compliance are also followed to strengthen the legal compliance of the migration laws
and conditions.
2. Migration act, 1958 to the 41 section:
Subdivision 1 of the stated section specifies the conditions regarding the visa of a certain class.
Additionally, the subdivision 2A of the stated section mentions that after visiting the Australian
country, the visa holder will not be permitted for applying to a significant visa while living in
1 Visa, parental, Immi.Homeaffairs.Gov.Au (Webpage,2017)
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/sponsored-parent-
temporary-870

Migration law and cases 3 | P a g e
Australia 2. Although, subdivision 2A depicted that minister of Australia can refrain an
individual regarding visitor's reasons ordered under 2.05 provisions which states that if an
individual appeals in writing regarding grant of visa then, the Minister may refrain the conditions
as per 41 section {2}. Therefore, Mr. Karan may write an application to the Minister regarding
the conditions stated under 41 section {2}3.
3. Case scenario:
Mr. Karan hence wrote an application to the department of immigration regarding the living
conditions specifying that he is married to a woman belonging to Australia and that she is seven
months pregnant. On the other hand, he mentioned that not allowing him to live in the respective
place may harm his wife's mental health saying that she already had an offensive marriage
before. The individual even stated several reasons regarding his willingness to stay in Australia.
Despite the reasons given by him the immigration Minister rejected the application saying that
his reasons were not proficient for letting him stay in Australia. Furthermore, the plea against the
judgment of the Minister which also got rejected by the chief judge saying that the matter was
lacking relevant information that's why he could not analyze the case for further judgments.
Yet, Mr. Karan did not give up and plea to the Australian court in which he specified the same
reasons for staying in Australia. While considering his case the court passed a judgment that the
immigration Minister did not pay attention to the reasons and his willingness to live in Australia
by him. Additionally, the court stated that the Minister only relied upon the reasons concerning
the wife's decisions ignoring the relevant document and case material while making decisions.
Therefore, in defense of Mr. Karan, the court provided him with relief that he can write an
application against the decision made by the Minister as per mandamus that can be affirmed by
him4. Therefore, it could be inferred that subdivision 2A depicted that minister of Australia can
2 Grourr Hourht, "MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 41Conditions On
Visas", Www5.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage, 2020)
3 "MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 46Valid Visa Application", Www5.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage, 2020)
<http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma1958118/s46.htm
4 Law, immigration, "Code Of Conduct - Australian Migration Agents And Immigration
Lawyers Melbourne | Seekvisa", Australian Migration Agents And Immigration Lawyers
Melbourne | Seekvisa (Webpage, 2019) https://www.seekvisa.com.au/code-of-conduct/

Migration law and cases 4 | P a g e
refrain an individual regarding visitor's reasons ordered under 2.05 provisions which states that if
an individual appeals in writing regarding grant of visa
4. Order by the Court:
The court passed the judgment that Mr. Karan's case will be reviewed separately setting aside the
order made earlier by the Minister under the order of Mandamus and court process namely
Certiorari. In defense of him, the court stated that the immigration minister is obliged to pay the
cost of application incurred while writing the application for staying in Australia. Moreover, the
court made a judgment saying that the immigration Minister didn’t consider well the reasons
given by him for his willingness to live in Australia. Additionally, the court stated that the
Minister only depended on the reasons that were concerning the wife's decisions ignoring the
document and assessing the case material while passing the decision. Therefore, Mr. Karan is
allowed to write an application against the department of immigration and demand him to pay
for the application cost5. These orders are followed to clear the visa security for the Karan.
5. The legal interpretation:
The court, therefore, used the legal interpretation principles while deciding the case. The legal
interpretation principles recommended that the court can interpret facts and figures for the case
application and later on, the legal interpretation can be passed by the court while introspecting
the case of MR. Karan. On the other hand, with the help of early law cases regarding
immigration, it can pass the relevant judgments regarding the case. Therefore, it observed and
analyzed the case of Minister V Singh regarding immigration and cross-culturalism affairs6. The
court declared that the judge can sometimes pass on judgment without paying attention or
concerning the case which results in the unfair decision making. The court added that there is a
thin line between having awareness about the content and addressing the matter fact that is stated
5 "MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 46Valid Visa Application", Www5.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage, 2020)
<http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma1958118/s46.htm
6 Visa, parental, Immi.Homeaffairs.Gov.Au (Webpage,2017)
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/sponsored-parent-
temporary-870

Migration law and cases 5 | P a g e
under the deed. Introspecting the decision of Karan's case, the department immigration didn't
analyze his wife's medical report provided by the psychologist who mentioned that prohibition of
Karan from living in Australia can have a negative effect on his wife's mental health.

Migration law and cases 6 | P a g e
6. REFERENCES:
Law, immigration, "Code Of Conduct - Australian Migration Agents And Immigration Lawyers
Melbourne | Seekvisa", Australian Migration Agents And Immigration Lawyers
Melbourne | Seekvisa (Webpage, 2019) https://www.seekvisa.com.au/code-of-conduct/
Law, Migration,"MIGRATION AGENTS REGULATIONS 1998 - SCHEDULE 2Code Of
Conduct", Classic.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage,2018)
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/mar1998287/sch2.html
Visa, parental, Immi.Homeaffairs.Gov.Au (Webpage,2017)
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/sponsored-parent-
temporary-870
Gupur, Kourhh, "Migration Regulations 1994", Legislation.Gov.Au (Webpage, 2020)
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017C00582
Hourht, Grourr, "MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 41Conditions On
Visas", Www5.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage, 2020)
http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma1958118/s41.html
MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 46Valid Visa Application", Www5.Austlii.Edu.Au (Webpage, 2020)
<http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma1958118/s46.html>