This essay examines the debate surrounding minimum wage versus living wage in British Columbia, exploring the economic impacts of both. It begins by defining minimum wage as the legal minimum hourly rate and living wage as the amount needed for basic necessities. The study presents the argument that increasing the minimum wage alone may not eliminate poverty, citing evidence on the number of industrial workers earning below a living wage and the lack of proper shelter. The essay counters with the claim that a substantial portion of minimum wage earners are not primary income providers, and therefore, a wage increase might not be the most effective solution. It analyzes various claims and counterclaims, providing evidence from sources like CBC News, and academic research. The analysis then suggests alternative policies such as work-based subsidies, similar to the Canada Workers Benefit, to support low-income workers and concludes by recommending further research and surveys to address the gap between minimum and living wages effectively. The essay's goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the issue to help policymakers make informed decisions.