This project presents a mock human rights hearing concerning a case of alleged gender discrimination in employment, specifically focusing on an advertisement for a 'Residential Unit Officer' position in a new women's prison in Alberta. The project includes arguments for both the applicant, Herb Wilco, who claims direct discrimination under the Alberta Human Rights Act, and the respondent, Whoville Penitentiary for Women, which argues that the gender-specific requirement is a bona fide occupational requirement justified by the privacy needs of the women prisoners. The project culminates in a decision favoring the respondent, supported by the rationale that appointing a male officer would infringe on the privacy of the female inmates, aligning with the principles established in the Meiorin case regarding occupational requirements. The analysis considers the qualifications of the applicant for other positions within the correctional services, further supporting the justification of the respondent's actions.