University Essay: Phil 120 - Moral Argument for God's Existence
VerifiedAdded on 2022/09/09
|6
|1232
|26
Essay
AI Summary
This essay presents a moral argument for the existence of God, drawing upon the framework of divine command theory and the human understanding of moral laws. It explores the arguments based on unbiased moral evidences and the role of God in providing the best description of objective moral facts. The essay further examines objections to the moral argument, such as the challenges to morality in situations where lying may be necessary, and the perceived conflicts between moral practices and the existence of God. It then offers replies to these objections, arguing that the moral argument does not necessitate belief in God for moral behavior and that it supports the existence of an objective morality. Finally, the essay concludes by evaluating the success of these replies and the overall strength of the moral argument in supporting the existence of God, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between good and evil and choosing good over evil as a representation of moral beliefs.

[Type the company name]
Moral Argument Essay
[Type the document subtitle]
SystemJP
[Pick the date]
Moral Argument Essay
[Type the document subtitle]
SystemJP
[Pick the date]
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Moral Argument Essay
Introduction
This essay aims to represent the moral arguments to support the concept of the God’s
existence, which itself is a matter of conflicts among the human since civilisation. Moral
arguments are very interesting and important to describe the comment as a matter of faith that
God is the creator of the universe. This essay will make effective continuation of different
kind of arguments with the practical implication and several objections connected to the
arguments about the God’s existence (Stanford; , 2018). Moral arguments base the beliefs
and practices and concept of the God’s existence is related to people and their religion.
Before making the arguments, a clear discussion about the topic deciding the features of these
arguments is, as theistic arguments. This essay will represent the arguments on the base of
divine command theories, objections and on the base of belief of human in God.
Arguments
On 8th April 1966, a title present by the Time Magazine became a hot point of the discussion
that was a question, “Is God Dead?” This was noticeable for finale of the so-called “death of
God” program, which had progressively grown mist over the nineteenth and into the
twentieth century. Based on the moral argument structure suggested and applied by Kant to
reply the objections of the God existence this essay will present arguments on the variation of
the three different templates
There are unbiased moral evidences.
God delivers the best description of the presence of objective moral facts.
Therefore, (undoubtedly) God be existent.
Introduction
This essay aims to represent the moral arguments to support the concept of the God’s
existence, which itself is a matter of conflicts among the human since civilisation. Moral
arguments are very interesting and important to describe the comment as a matter of faith that
God is the creator of the universe. This essay will make effective continuation of different
kind of arguments with the practical implication and several objections connected to the
arguments about the God’s existence (Stanford; , 2018). Moral arguments base the beliefs
and practices and concept of the God’s existence is related to people and their religion.
Before making the arguments, a clear discussion about the topic deciding the features of these
arguments is, as theistic arguments. This essay will represent the arguments on the base of
divine command theories, objections and on the base of belief of human in God.
Arguments
On 8th April 1966, a title present by the Time Magazine became a hot point of the discussion
that was a question, “Is God Dead?” This was noticeable for finale of the so-called “death of
God” program, which had progressively grown mist over the nineteenth and into the
twentieth century. Based on the moral argument structure suggested and applied by Kant to
reply the objections of the God existence this essay will present arguments on the variation of
the three different templates
There are unbiased moral evidences.
God delivers the best description of the presence of objective moral facts.
Therefore, (undoubtedly) God be existent.

Moral Argument Essay
These templates provide verities of features to the practitioners to apply their arguments to
support that if a person holds beliefs in the God than it is natural to identify the this will also
argue to mark that he beliefs in his existence as well (Fremstedal, 2013).
Human civilisation is mater of discussion at many points, who told us to be faithful, who told
us to not to lie, who told us to serve the humanity and who command that death is real and
everyone have to make efforts for helpful life. These are moral laws implemented by a divine
communication in human because according to state or country laws theft or murder is a
crime but where does this idea came from, how a human understand to punish unlawful act.
Obliviously God command the soul to practice the act not harming others. Recognition of the
moral law by divine method has reasonable belief in God (Copan, 2013).
Moral awareness and information about that God is necessary to enlighten human
mindfulness of moral truth, that reflect the self-conclusion of human to decide immoral act
are against the command of God. The story of Adam represents that denying the moral
implication as result to be punished. Choosing god over evil, supports that human have moral
knowledge and understandings (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Objections
Many objections are presented to the moral representation and questions that challenges the
moral arguments, and represent that questions over the existence of God and application of
the moral command and moral knowledge in some situations. These objections put question
to whether to apply principal of morality in case of necessity to speak life of person by
speaking lie (Copan, 2013).
These templates provide verities of features to the practitioners to apply their arguments to
support that if a person holds beliefs in the God than it is natural to identify the this will also
argue to mark that he beliefs in his existence as well (Fremstedal, 2013).
Human civilisation is mater of discussion at many points, who told us to be faithful, who told
us to not to lie, who told us to serve the humanity and who command that death is real and
everyone have to make efforts for helpful life. These are moral laws implemented by a divine
communication in human because according to state or country laws theft or murder is a
crime but where does this idea came from, how a human understand to punish unlawful act.
Obliviously God command the soul to practice the act not harming others. Recognition of the
moral law by divine method has reasonable belief in God (Copan, 2013).
Moral awareness and information about that God is necessary to enlighten human
mindfulness of moral truth, that reflect the self-conclusion of human to decide immoral act
are against the command of God. The story of Adam represents that denying the moral
implication as result to be punished. Choosing god over evil, supports that human have moral
knowledge and understandings (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Objections
Many objections are presented to the moral representation and questions that challenges the
moral arguments, and represent that questions over the existence of God and application of
the moral command and moral knowledge in some situations. These objections put question
to whether to apply principal of morality in case of necessity to speak life of person by
speaking lie (Copan, 2013).
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

Moral Argument Essay
Some people represent that they are moral in their practices but they have no faith about the
God existence, as this is their personal reflection to practice moral act in their life. This
objection present that an atheist can’t be moral?”
Other objection is related to the objective aspect moral practice, in some case human needs to
speak lie or have to perform immoral act in order to save life or a person, than does still
morality exist in these practices (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Some objections argues about the imperfect practices for the female,, infanticide and
prostitution of the girls practices common in the culture. These immoral practices are not
fitting in the frame of God’s moral command and human’s moral nature.
These objections are really appreciable and related to the theistic practice of moral argument
of God’s existence.
Reply to the objections
These all objection against the moral arguments of the God’s existence practices, are related
to the practical life example where a person found confusion to believe the God or not. Moral
arguments have sufficient grounds to answer these objections;
The moral argument partakes nil to do with trust in God. The moral argument and its
supporters never made argument that an individual they hold no belief in God are not moral.
Somewhat, the argument agreement is with, objective morality based on moral
understanding. There can be no base for neutral morality, If God does not exist, and this
represents that atheists can be moral (Stanford; , 2018).
Another objection in this essay is to question the absolute nature of the God’s existence, this
moral argument support that Moral Arguments not support or defend absolute morality. It
competes that there is a stock of morality, which exceeds human sentiments, decisions,
Some people represent that they are moral in their practices but they have no faith about the
God existence, as this is their personal reflection to practice moral act in their life. This
objection present that an atheist can’t be moral?”
Other objection is related to the objective aspect moral practice, in some case human needs to
speak lie or have to perform immoral act in order to save life or a person, than does still
morality exist in these practices (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Some objections argues about the imperfect practices for the female,, infanticide and
prostitution of the girls practices common in the culture. These immoral practices are not
fitting in the frame of God’s moral command and human’s moral nature.
These objections are really appreciable and related to the theistic practice of moral argument
of God’s existence.
Reply to the objections
These all objection against the moral arguments of the God’s existence practices, are related
to the practical life example where a person found confusion to believe the God or not. Moral
arguments have sufficient grounds to answer these objections;
The moral argument partakes nil to do with trust in God. The moral argument and its
supporters never made argument that an individual they hold no belief in God are not moral.
Somewhat, the argument agreement is with, objective morality based on moral
understanding. There can be no base for neutral morality, If God does not exist, and this
represents that atheists can be moral (Stanford; , 2018).
Another objection in this essay is to question the absolute nature of the God’s existence, this
moral argument support that Moral Arguments not support or defend absolute morality. It
competes that there is a stock of morality, which exceeds human sentiments, decisions,
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Moral Argument Essay
prejudices, and tendencies. Supporting the lifesaving by lying is moral judgement to serve the
humanity (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Practice of ill-treatment is not a moral, and moral argument supports the objective moral
practices that allows human to think about wrong and take active actions to stop these and
serve the humanity, as doing this is a part of moral life and no society will prevent such act
with dealing to live according the moral practices.
Moral arguments to support the existence of the God deal with the behavioural and
psychological concept related to judgment and decision making by using the moral principles
of the divinity. This supports the existence of God is real because making difference between
the good and evil and selection of good over the evil is representation of moral beliefs of
God’s existence.
prejudices, and tendencies. Supporting the lifesaving by lying is moral judgement to serve the
humanity (Zermatt Scutt, 2010).
Practice of ill-treatment is not a moral, and moral argument supports the objective moral
practices that allows human to think about wrong and take active actions to stop these and
serve the humanity, as doing this is a part of moral life and no society will prevent such act
with dealing to live according the moral practices.
Moral arguments to support the existence of the God deal with the behavioural and
psychological concept related to judgment and decision making by using the moral principles
of the divinity. This supports the existence of God is real because making difference between
the good and evil and selection of good over the evil is representation of moral beliefs of
God’s existence.

Moral Argument Essay
Bibliography
Copan, P. (2013). he moral argument for God‟ s existence. Evidence for God: 50 Arguments
for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science.
Fremstedal, R. (2013, Januray 27). The Moral Argument for the Existence of God and
Immortality. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from Wiley Online Library:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12004
Stanford; . (2018, June 29). Moral Arguments for the Existence of God. Retrieved March 31,
2020, from plato.stanford.edu: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-arguments-
god/#HisMorArgForGodExi
Zermatt Scutt, M. (2010). Kant's Moral Theology. British journal for the history of
philosophy, 611-633.
Bibliography
Copan, P. (2013). he moral argument for God‟ s existence. Evidence for God: 50 Arguments
for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science.
Fremstedal, R. (2013, Januray 27). The Moral Argument for the Existence of God and
Immortality. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from Wiley Online Library:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12004
Stanford; . (2018, June 29). Moral Arguments for the Existence of God. Retrieved March 31,
2020, from plato.stanford.edu: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-arguments-
god/#HisMorArgForGodExi
Zermatt Scutt, M. (2010). Kant's Moral Theology. British journal for the history of
philosophy, 611-633.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 6
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2026 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.





