Project Plan: NAIDOC Week Celebration - Central Queensland University

This document presents a project plan for the NAIDOC Week celebration, including risk analysis, tolerance levels, and lessons learned. The risk register identifies potential threats such as project delays and budget overruns, along with corresponding mitigation strategies. Tolerance levels for time and cost are specified to manage project limitations. The plan also incorporates lessons learned from previous projects, focusing on improving event implementation and addressing potential issues through proactive planning and stakeholder communication. The document concludes with a project submission approval section and references used in the project's development, highlighting the importance of information security and project scheduling in the context of indigenous community engagement at Central Queensland University.

TERM 1 ASS_2
PROJECT PLAN
Student name Student number Qu/s responsible for.
Campus: Insert campus or distance
Tutor: Insert tutor name
Tutorial number: Insert the tutorial number

7 RISKS
Risk linked to the project are analyzed which include assessment of stages of project, scope, time,
stakeholders, duration, and users of week celebration of NAIDOC.
Risk Register
Name Description Likelihood Impact Response
type
Mitigation strategy
Threat 1. Delay in Project Medium Week celebration
of NAIDOC will be
postponed and
mismanagement
of events takes
place.
Duration
increase
will raise
the cost.
 Suitable follow up is
taken regarding the
specified duration.
 Duration is managed in
several consecutive
stages if any delay in
task takes place.
2. Overrun of Budget High NAIDOC
committee and
CQU both face
financial loss.
Cost  Good management and
better planning.
 Enhancing manager
skills.
Threat 1. Incorrect Selection
Requirement
Less Selection of
unnecessary
needs can
enhance projects
final cost and will
create overrun of
the budget.
Duration
and cost
 According to one’s
demand, several
requirements are desired
to be selected according
to context depending on
certain budget.
 Major discussions are
carried for selection
requirement.
2. Meetings
misconduct
Less The gathered
information is
false depending
on any factor that
can be, cost,
duration, and
scope.
Duration
and cost
 Meetings need to be
properly documented.
 All stakeholders are
properly and actively
involved.
Opportuni
ty
1. Improves
awareness and
understanding
regarding learning
and culture of
Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander
community
High Enhances the
knowledge and
skills of staff and
students
regarding the
working of the
indigenous
community.
Quality
learning
8 TOLERANCES
Value of tolerance is numerous extra limits supported by projects to achieve it in a certain manner. It
discusses regarding the budget and time limits which are determined to keep in view project
limitations that are presented below.
Tolerance Specific Tolerance allowed
Tolerance specified for the time 1.5 to 2.5 days
Tolerance specified for cost $1300- $1500
2

9 LESSONS
Previous lessons learned Proposed activity to address
(in the current project)
Work package which
activity will be added
Lesson
The provided task is distributed
among several stages.
Continuous activities and event
practicing help in learning
lessons that need to be
accomplished. The practices of
events and activities must be
done at a definite time so that
project related error can be
detected easily for NAIDOC
Celebration Week. It even
includes stage based
improvement that is required.
The activity proposed for
learning’s of the different
lesson is ‘activities and events
implementation’ and have
created 1.4.5 as ID of WBS.
This particular activity is
previously scheduled to week
celebration of NAIDOC that
provides an idea regarding
activities required to be
implemented at CQU campus.
Project stages will get
added to work packages
which are planned prior to
NAIDOC discussion so the
main issues occurring can
converse with a committee
of NAIDOC and its project
team.
Project Submission Approval
The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the NAIDOC project Assessment
Task 2 and agree with the information presented in this document.
Signature: Date:
Print Name:
Title:
Organisation:
3

REFERENCES
 Peltier, T.R., 2010. Information security risk analysis. Auerbach publications, viewed 4 May
2018, http://cs.columbusstate.edu/curriculum/syllabi_archive/syllabi_2007/spring_2007/
CPSC_6167_bai.doc
 Wu, M.C. and Sun, S.H., 2006. A project scheduling and staff assignment model considering
learning effect. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(11-12),
pp.1190-1195, viewed 4 May 2018, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
doi=10.1.1.1032.4627&rep=rep1&type=pdf
4