Audit Case Analysis: Negligence, Ethics and Financial Reporting
VerifiedAdded on 2022/08/24
|9
|2012
|28
Case Study
AI Summary
This case analysis examines two situations involving Oscar Edwards Vance (OEV), an auditing firm. The first situation involves Framed Ltd, a client that went into liquidation after OEV provided an unmodified audit opinion. The liquidator discovered fraud by sales representatives, and the case explores OEV's potential negligence in failing to detect the fraud and its liability to Framed and Vic Bank, which extended overdraft terms based on the audited financial statements. The analysis covers the elements of negligence, including duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. The second situation presents an ethical dilemma where an audit senior, Bruce, instructs an auditor, Jack, not to record material adjustments to avoid upsetting a client, Switch Pty Ltd. The analysis explores ethical issues, principles, and values, including integrity, objectivity, and professional behavior, and considers alternatives and consequences. It refers to the IESBA Code of Ethics and emphasizes the importance of ethical decision-making in accounting to maintain the integrity of financial reporting. The analysis concludes with reflections on the importance of ethical principles and the need for alternatives to address ethical dilemmas.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 9