AYN456 Semester 1 Business Law Report: Fun Parks Case Study

This report examines a business law case involving Fun Parks Adventureland and its liability for injuries sustained by a park visitor. The scenario involves a married couple and the wife's brother, an employee of the park, who were visiting the park using free passes. The report analyzes the issue of negligence, focusing on the duty of care owed by the park, any breaches of that duty, and the resulting injuries. It considers the application of negligence principles, including foreseeability, proximate relationships, and causation. The report also addresses the enforceability of an exclusion clause present at the park's entrance, evaluating whether the clause effectively limits the park's liability. Relevant case law, such as Jaensch v Coffey, Caparo Industries PLC v Dickman, Doubleday v Kelly, Bolton v. Stone, and Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd, is applied to the facts. The conclusion finds Fun Parks Adventureland liable under negligence principles for the losses suffered.