This case study presents a comprehensive negotiation plan developed by a social worker to advocate for the rights of adolescent girls within the context of a family violence steering committee. The plan meticulously outlines the steps taken, including clarifying negotiation goals, establishing the Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), developing a strategic frame, and formulating a collaborative negotiation strategy. The social worker adopts a collaborative negotiation style, emphasizing open communication, mutual understanding, and the exploration of alternative solutions to address the lack of separate sections and priority for adolescent girls facing crime and violence. The analysis covers the importance of a separate section for adolescent girls, the use of integrative bargaining, and the influence of interprofessional practices. The social worker also explores alternative approaches to influence the negotiation process and ensure ethical practices. The plan includes the use of practical methods like drama and education to create awareness and advocate for the bill, emphasizing the need for justice and services for this vulnerable group. The case study underscores the significance of understanding the issue, ethical considerations, and the importance of collaboration in achieving positive outcomes. The document also highlights the use of collaborative negotiation and integrative bargaining to reach mutual understanding and achieve the goal of providing priority and separate section for adolescent girls.