Celebrity Privacy in Network Management Organisations - MN501 Essay

This essay delves into the complex issue of celebrity privacy within the context of network management in organizations. It analyzes the delicate balance between a celebrity's right to privacy and the public's interest, examining various legal protections such as confidentiality, libel laws, and privacy statutes. The essay also addresses the impact of modern technology and intellectual property laws on celebrity privacy. It cites examples, including an interview with Clara Lago, to illustrate the challenges celebrities face in maintaining their privacy. Furthermore, the essay presents arguments both for and against the right to privacy for celebrities, concluding with a reflection on the importance of finding a balance between public interest and individual rights. Desklib is a great platform to find similar solved assignments and past papers.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT IN
ORGANIZATION
First A. Author, Second B. Author, and Third C. Author
Abstract— The image of this paper is all about
right to privacy for celebrities. The paper
analyzes the fact celebrities should check the fact
that what should be published about them. In
the main section of the report various examples
has been provided which deals privacy rights of
various celebrities. Along with this an idea has
been provided regarding confidentiality and its
importance in the life of celebrities.
Index Terms— risks, privacy and human right.
Introduction
Human Right convention provides check over
the fact that everyone has the right to privacy
along with right to free expression. Celebrity is an
honor and it is normally considered to be reward
for success. Various kind of businessman and
personality can easily earn it by wit or intelligence
Privacy is generally inclusive of personal
intimacies, sanctity of family life. It also focusses
on safeguard of individual autonomy along with
recognizing of individual control to various aspects
of life [2]. Unlike private citizen, celebrities also
need to attract media for promoting their work. It
can be about their upcoming movies or Netflix
series. The whole topic is about the fact that
celebrities should not have privacy often comes
down due to the fact that celebrities are rich and
famous. In the coming pages of the essay an idea
has been provided regrading various kinds of
protection in large number of cases for celebrity
like confidentiality, libel, privacy statutes and
lastly self-regulation of the press.
Celebrities are not public property
Large number of celebrities have recently
provided reports related to complain of about the
fact how media disturbs their public life. In the
year of 2014, 28% of people confessed the fact
that they were much interested about life event of
various celebrities. Confidentiality is nothing but a
list of action which can be easily used for
protection of personal information [5].
Confidentiality does not protect personal
information because of the fact that is personal.
The information is only protected before the
person disclosing it the particular disclosing the
information is subjected to a particular kind of
obligation of various confidence which is arising as
a result of confidence which arise out of
relationship. Some rare cases of confidentiality are
seen which consist of personal kind of
information. Public domain is known to be a
defense case in which issues of confidentiality
arises [7]. In addition to various kinds of public
domain public interest is also considered to be
never defined in a way. There are some kinds of
difficult in which laws of confidentiality is seen.
Now the thing is clear about the fact about
working of confidentiality when provided
information is true or untrue.
The law which focus on protection of personal
information is mainly evoked by various kinds of
personalities. Libel does not ensure about the fact
of disclosing of personal information because of
the fact that is personal [9]. It does not require
any kind of relationship between the claiming and
defending. In libel there is no kind of defense
related to publication. In so there two kinds of
catches which can be used for protection of
personal information. The first catch is about the
fact that publication can be considered to be false.
Or a situation can be seen in which information
published is true but the defended might not be
able to prove it true [9]. The overriding law
generally a law which can be used for justification
of publication. If anyhow publication is found to
be true, then it does not matter regarding the fact
how the private kind of information is humiliating
[5]. Subject to any kind of confidentiality or no
kind of publication of personal kind of ownership
is found to be true.
When common kind of laws are provided
absolute priority about the truth about the status.
Major kind of technology is seen by the
development of modern kind of technology like
telecommunication and computer. The broadcast
1

Act of 1996 generally unwarranted use of privacy
can be easily avoided. Evolution of computer gave
rise to another kind of status. Personal
information on various kinds of computers gave
rise to various kinds of data protection act 1984.
Legislation of data protection is considered to be
comprehensive kind of privacy code. It generally
covers all the vital kind of information which is
kept in computers and any other kind of
structured files [11]. The ultimate effect of
legislation of data protection is introducing of new
statutory which can be again used for unfair use of
various kinds of personal information. In various
kinds of data protection legislation there are
limited amount of defense of public domain. It is
mainly used when in information has been easily
made publicly by making use of results which is
taken by steps taken by the person.
Intellectual property law
Various celebrities are no way considered to
be public spectacle and they have the right of
retaining of their privacy. Major time of people
are more curious about their life. The curiosity is
much extended about their relationship and life of
various celebrities. Intellectual property laws are
being provided in best course for providing option
which is available to a celebrity for protection of
his rights [8]. Many times it is seen that a film
character name is used for promoting products of
a company in an authorized way. Those obtain
names are used for in merchandising many times
which become a problem for large number of
celebrities. At present trademarks are used widely
for protecting the names of the movies, names
and lastly characters from any kind of
unauthorized commercial exploitation of
merchandising. Commercial use can be done by
the help of licensing [4]. Various movies and
character name are protected by help of
copyright. Various kinds of laws are used for
ensured for having fame which is inherited
through this kind of law and can also help the
family members and upcoming generation of
celebrities to easily draw benefits from it.
In a recent interview Clara Lago stated that
she did not receive any kind of privacy as
journalist were very much interested in his life.
Celebrity photographers are also known as
paparazzi waited outside the home of the
celebrity so that they get good photo of them
along with story for publication [9]. Many presses
round to globe hire detective for easily finding out
the information of famous people. Major
celebrities around the globe are famous because
of the fact that their job puts them in eye of
public. This is inclusive of royalty, actors and
sportsperson [13]. What various celebrities round
the globe do is their own person life is their own
business no person from outside should interfere
in it. They should have time to relax just like
normal people just like people with normal jobs. If
celebrities are chased by paparazzi, then it can
easily create an incident for running out
somewhere for a while and also looks for
escaping.
Publicity keep the celebrity in spotlight
In some of the cases it is seen that celebrities
took up the choice of being famous and giving up
privacy is not a part of their job. They generally
make a lot of money and comes up privilege
lifestyle because of the fact they are considered to
be a public eye. They make use of press for their
own advantage like promotion of films, songs and
lastly TV shows [11]. The fact is also considered
some of the stars are not famous without the help
of magazine, TV talking about them. Famous
people round the globe need press and press
depend on celebrities for selling of their magazine.
TV audience is considered to be two-way
relationship which can be easily benefited.
Reason for right to privacy for
celebrities
There are many reason behind the fact that
celebrities should have right to privacy like they
should be allowed for relaxing with family and
friends. It is expected that celebrities should be
known for their work like acting or singing not
because of their private live [12]. Various things
like bad hair day or what they wear should not be
taken into account. Being followed by large
number of photographers can be considered to be
scary in many cases and can easily put anybody in
wrong position.
Celebrities does not right to privacy
Now there are three reason behind the fact
that celebrities do not have right to privacy like
amazing kind of lifestyle and sharing of their
personal live [10]. Celebrities can easily make use
of press when they need. It is not ethical to draw
2

the attention of celebrity as per the need. Only
bodies like newspaper and magazine are
responsible for understanding the needs of people
that is celebrity gossip.
From the above pages it can be concluded
that this essay is all about importance of privacy in
the life of Celebrity. |An idea has been provided
regarding how media disturbs various kinds of
public life of celebrity. After an analysis has been
done regarding confidentiality which is used for
protection of personal information. Interview with
Clara logo has been done where she said that she
does not have any kind of privacy in her life. An
idea has been provided regarding intellectual for
various celebrities. In the above pages of the essay
it has been justified that celebrities are not public
property. In the above paragraph three reason has
been provided regarding the fact that privacy is
considered to be an important part. After that
three reason has been provided why celebrities
does not need privacy.
3

REFERENCES
[1] Marwick, A.E. Scandal or sex crime? Gendered
privacy and the celebrity nude photo leaks. Ethics
and Information Technology, 19(3), pp.177-191,
2017.
[2] Post, R.C. Rereading Warren and Brandeis:
Privacy, property, and appropriation.
In Privacy (pp. 125-158). Routledge, 2017.
[3] Garrow, D.J. Liberty and sexuality: The right to
privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. Open
Road Media, 2015.
[4] Benn, S.I. Privacy, freedom, and respect for
persons. In Privacy and personality (pp. 1-26).
Routledge, 2017.
[5] Dogan, S.L. Haelan Laboratories v. Topps
Chewing Gum: Publicity as a Legal Right, , 2014.
[6] Tushnet, R. Raising Walls Against Overlapping
Rights: Preemption and the Right of
Publicity. Notre Dame L. Rev., 92, p.1539, 2016.
[7] Fallon, R. Celebgate: Two methodological
approaches to the 2014 celebrity photo hacks.
In International Conference on Internet
Science (pp. 49-60). Springer, Cham, 2015, May.
[8] Stewart, D.R.C. and Littau, J. Up, Periscope:
Mobile streaming video technologies, privacy in
public, and the right to record. Journalism & Mass
Communication Quarterly, 93(2), pp.312-331,
2016.
[9] Stern, M.J. and Stern, N. A New Test to
Reconcile the Right of Publicity with Core First
Amendment Values. J. Intell. Prop. L., 23, p.93,
2015.
[10] Peck, N. Drawing back the curtain: a post-
Leveson examination of celebrity, privacy and
press intrusion (Doctoral dissertation, City,
University of London), 2017.
[11] Brock, G., The right to be forgotten: Privacy
and the media in the digital age. IB Tauris, 2016.
[12] Giroux, H.A. Selfie culture in the age of
corporate and state surveillance. Third Text, 29(3),
pp.155-164. 2015
[13] Marôpo, L. and Jorge, A. At the heart of
celebrity: celebrities' children and their rights in
the media. Comunicación y Sociedad, 27(4), p.17,
2014.
4