MN501 Network Management: Celebrity Privacy Rights (Term-1, 2018)

This presentation delves into the complex intersection of network management and celebrity privacy rights, addressing the balance between freedom of expression and the need to protect individuals from unwarranted intrusion. It examines the argument that celebrities, due to their public roles, relinquish some privacy, while also emphasizing their rights to personal space and protection from harmful media attention. The presentation outlines reasons supporting both sides of the debate, including the role of publicity in a celebrity's career and the potential dangers of constant surveillance. Furthermore, it touches upon legal mechanisms like intellectual property law and privacy statutes designed to safeguard publicity rights and private information. The presentation concludes by underscoring the importance of striking a balance between public interest and individual privacy in the context of celebrity life, highlighting the media's potential impact on their well-being. Desklib offers a wealth of resources, including past papers and solved assignments, to aid students in their academic pursuits.

Network Management in Organization
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Authors Note:

Table of content
 Introduction
 Celebrities are not public property
 Publicity keeps celebrity in spot light
 Three main reason why celebrity have right to privacy
 Three main reason why celebrity does not have right to privacy
 Reason for protection of private information
 How to protect publicity rights
 Privacy statutes and self regulation
 Conclusion
 References

Introduction
 Human rights focus on
right to privacy and right
to free expression.
 Celebrities need to
attract media so that
they promote their work.

Celebrities are not public property
 Celebrities are famous
just because of their
job which keeps them
in the eye of public.
 What celebrities do in
their private life is
totally their business.

Publicity keep the celebrities in Spotlight
 Celebrities has made up their
choice to be famous and giving
up of privacy is considered to be
part of their job.
 In some cases they make use of
press for their own benefit.
 Famous people round the globe
need celebrity for selling
magazine

Three reason why celebrities have right to
privacy
 Time for relaxing with friends and
family members should be given.
 Celebrity should be known for their
work like acting or anything else. They
should not be known for their private
life.
 In many cases it is seen that being
followed by photographers can be
considered to be dangerous.

Three reason why celebrities does
not been right to privacy
 Celebrities live an amazing
lifestyle and sharing of their
lifestyle is considered to be a
part of deal.
 Celebrities makes use of press
and choose their attention when
they need it.
 Newspaper magazine only
provides what the public want.

Reason for protection of private
information
 Confidentiality
 Libel
 Various kinds of
private statutes
 Self regulation of press

How to protect publicity rights
 Intellectual property
law helps in protecting
the rights of celebrity
 Celebrity makes use of
privacy rights for
retaining their privacy
rights.

Privacy statutes and self regulation
 Broadcasting
 Data protection

Conclusion
 The presentation
concludes us to the
importance of privacy in
the life of celebrity. The
presentation also relates us
to fact that how media can
easily disturb the public
life of celebrity.

References
 [1] Dogan, S.L. Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum:
Publicity as a Legal Right, , 2014.
 [2] Tushnet, R. Raising Walls Against Overlapping Rights:
Preemption and the Right of Publicity. Notre Dame L. Rev., 92,
p.1539, 2016.
 [3] Fallon, R. Celebgate: Two methodological approaches to the
2014 celebrity photo hacks. In International Conference on Internet
Science (pp. 49-60). Springer, Cham, 2015, May.
 [4] Stewart, D.R.C. and Littau, J. Up, Periscope: Mobile streaming
video technologies, privacy in public, and the right to
record. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2),
pp.312-331, 2016.