Psychology and Neuroscience: The Free Will Conundrum Examined

This essay delves into the ongoing debate regarding free will in light of advancements in neuroscience. It explores arguments from psychologists and neuroscientists who suggest that findings from brain research challenge the concept of free will. The essay examines key positions such as libertarianism, skepticism, and compatibilism, highlighting how neuroscience reveals the underlying mechanisms of human behavior and decision-making. It discusses concerns about moral responsibility and the potential for predicting behavior based on brain activity. Furthermore, it reviews studies on conscious intention and the unreliability of conscious control, and also the implications for medical directives and patient autonomy. The essay concludes by emphasizing the challenges neuroscience poses to our intuitive understanding of free will and the implications for moral and ethical considerations.

Q- Does neuroscience pose a challenge to free will?
A numerous of psychologist and neuroscientist have argued that experiment based
findings in respect of psychological basis of alternation of human behaviour which may
demonstrate that we lack free will. The debate of free will locked in a stalemate that has been
categorized into basic three primary competing positions which are libertarianism, scepticism
and compatibility were termed to be laid down. As the studied of neuroscience and psychology
disciplines which may continue to demystify the human mind set by revealing and observing the
human mind's consciousness and the probability of human behaviour which can decision
making, as the many researcher and philosophers have been tend to force to reassess the main
objective of free in light latest information (van Diepen and Mazaheri , 2018).
As per the latest update through neuroscience development raise the threat that may
convey the methodologies of brain that may cause behaviour will under expect our perspectives
in regards with free will and that may constantly about with moral and their responsibility. The
effective outcomes are being vanished and according to author it may provide three strong factor
to thought about these worries pretend motivated by neuroscience that are misplaced. The
development in neuroscience provide us with an increase understanding how brain actually work
and give thought process. ( Sims, 2019).
Recent development in neuroscience that can arise the whole understanding about the
methodologies followed by brain cause behaviour will which may undermine the particular
views kin regards with free will. As moral responsibilities stems largely from the basic fact that
only proved that challenges that can occur to be free will. It has become feasible to analyse
cognitive phenomena that are tend to be hall marks of that are basic components of human. The
underlying worries are remained to be forever until and unless the science scum out the main
logic behind every particular perception of a person which is determined ion respect to free will.
It is stated that neuroscience will help us to visualize the universal with in to as these are
just a basic part of law bound techniques that is found to be absent in universe. As the multiple
actions, decisions and choices are meant to be taken by an individual free willed. But as per the
studies, science represent them and considered to be threat. The multiple number of arguments
have been taken to clear them as well because some where it can assume to be a barrier in a
freedom of an individual. Other challenges can be moral responsibilities and freedom exist
independently of advances of neuroscience. The illustration of brain mechanisms a that may

under lying choices and action that are technically increase awareness of remaining problems.
As per the studies it has accepted the current hand-wringing about opportunity and moral duty
stems to a great extent from the way that as it were as of late has it gotten achievable to examine
intellectual wonders that are signs of what it is to be human .There is presently a broad and
innovative academic local area, whose point is to comprehend the instruments basic these
wonders. The basic concern is that those things that once appeared to be everlastingly past the
scope of science may before long surrender to it: neuroscience will lead us to see the 'universe
inside' as a vital part of the law-bound machine that is the universe without. The choices,
decisions and moves we make are for the most part thought to be uninhibitedly willed. Yet,
science uncovers them, or then again takes steps to uncover them, to be unthinkingly or actually
understandable, and some have contended that our instinctive thoughts of opportunity are in this
way mixed up In the event that God's premonition represented an issue for opportunity of the
will, the amount more dangerous to our instincts would it be on the off chance that we as people
knew enough to predict how our cerebrums would react to different circumstances or decisions?
In the event that our decisions and our activities are uncovered to be the aftereffect of neural
systems, how might we save our instincts about opportunity and its.
applied accomplice, moral obligation? (Dubrovsky, 2019)
Recent neuroscientific research has distinguished public interest in number of issues
which is ethical issues, which may include the fact that as a person is free and responsible to
choose their choices and action. The conditioning neuroscience have a described in a small
amount quantity as well as the three major advantages that are concluded by any researcher
are ;prediction, manipulability as well as parsimony. It has been seem as a intellectual tool, the
properties of intelligence and intellectual can be attain through many years of experience so that
in this specific area it can become a disturbed criteria. The world is meant to be not rigid and
determined and high level stated of the nervous system that can create a great conflict in the
following well being life. It may affect the beliefs, values as well as aspiration can be both that
can be real and casual efficacious in order to determine future events. The main question which
may can arises in this context by many researches. By many studies the affirmative answer have
been obtained.

In order to understand the free will the main bases which have been neutral can be termed
to understand interrelate findings which have certain elements in following which are
philosophy, neurological, cognitive, experimental as well as clinical psychology. From decades it
has been proved to be exhaustive as it can assume the circumstances and outcomes that may or
not may arise in following person mind. Mind is described to be complex and unexpected thing,
as free will termed to be cognitive abilities, that are need to be have a following capacity that
might be firstly prioritize and optionality as a set of neuroscience test and cases that can be inter
connected with a number of elements of concept of control. A free will index would majorly
allow for each search which may underlying neural collaborates of a ability and capacity which
are attained by people (van Diepen and Mazaheri , 2018).
The Challenge From Above
The intuitive note of individual freedom is that person is a head of his own actions. Free
will constantly inspired and contributed through theological doctrine as well as physical theory.
Gods om omniscience represent a further threat which termed to be preserved because as he
refrains from controlling us to lead on a way of light, according to studies, god does not control
our actions but brains does control our actions. To be reactant to each outcomes is behaviour of
human brains. Nobody controls anyone to do any kind of actions.
The preliminary determination it is significant which may help to under line that the main
idea of applying an procedure to develop and established whether the human being can be
termed to be have free will implies that termed to be accept a direct link with in a measurement
of brain functioning as well as pre existing theoretical construct. As there can be direct
connection as it is represented to solve many problems that may have arises during till yet. As
the based on work of author Libet, as it has been discovered bereitschaft potential, the RP, it may
described as slow build up of a debited scalp electrical potential of a few energetic micro volts
that may aims on mainly detected by the electro encephalography that can be (EEG), that may
proceed the onset of main subject SVM. As per studies, the RP is a electric psychological sign
planning and organised sign of planning, preparation as well as initiative as well. It has been
proved to be successful equipment which can promote and make understand the inhibit
understandings of main psychological states of a human mind set(Dubrovsky, 2019)

Unreliability of the conscious Intention
It has been demonstrated by many researches that a conscious mind and its intention of a
action is strongly which may influenced by number of events that can induce after the action
which was performed earlier. In this context, intentions are although describe particular
reconstructed in respect to a main process of interfere which is mainly based on elements that
may arise partially rebuild as per the process which may take furthermore( (Feltz, Missal and
Sims, 2019).. Many cases and studies under taken in order to study the basic concept of main
conflicts and intention,. So as resultant, in come instances the main subject that can be
intentional responses that can be focused and aims on the result of decision as well as those
targetted people who are tenderly to response towards the situation in which they are emerged in.
Prediction Choices
Most recent studies debits a result that following activity of frontal and parietal cortex,
and other neuroscience of the main targetted group coordinated and also it have been managed
by various of intervention. As per studies, it has been demonstrated that This behaviour of
independence may directly turn odd to medical directives. However, it is a right of patients to
deny treatments at any point. In this situations, it is necessary for nurses and management to
acknowledge main core of problem. The availability of treatment is also significant as well as it
mandatory to give preference to level of satisfaction as it is compulsory for each and every health
organisation. The heath inequalities elements also consist the smoking rates as well as the rates
should be managed by the management, as the current rate of smoking are touching peak and it is
harmful for affects on health(Dubrovsky, 2019)

References
Book and Journal
Dubrovsky, D.I., 2019. The Problem of Free Will and Modern Neuroscience. Neuroscience and
Behavioral Physiology, 49(5), pp.629-639.
Feltz, B., Missal, M. and Sims, A., 2019. Free Will, Causality, and Neuroscience (p. 192). Brill.
Gottlieb, J. and Oudeyer, P.Y., 2018. Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(12), pp.758-770.
van Diepen, R.M. and Mazaheri, A., 2018. The caveats of observing inter-trial phase-coherence
in cognitive neuroscience. Scientific reports, 8(1), pp.1-9.