Ethical and Legal Considerations in a Nursing Case Study Presentation

This presentation is a case study exploring ethical and legal considerations in nursing practice. It centers on the case of Doris, a 75-year-old widow with gastrointestinal bleeding who refuses further medical tests due to her fear of cancer. The presentation delves into the ethical dilemmas arising from this situation, particularly concerning patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. It examines the involvement of ethical principles like justice and confidentiality, as well as relevant nursing regulations from the CNA and the Canada Health Act. The case study analyzes potential actions by a nurse leader, weighing the pros and cons of each approach, and ultimately advocates for the use of communication skills to address the patient's concerns and encourage informed consent. The presentation concludes by emphasizing the importance of therapeutic relationships and patient-centered care in navigating such complex ethical scenarios, offering insights into how nurses can handle similar situations in their practice. Additionally, it explores how other healthcare professionals can learn about the ethical and legal principles associated with nursing practice and what kind of action can be taken in adverse situations.

CASE STUDY
PRESENTATION
ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATION IN
NURSING

INTRODUCTION
The main aim of the presentation is to discuss about
the nursing ethical and legal principle by critically
reviewing the case study.
The presentation focus to develop knowledge about
the ethical principle.

OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
STUDY■ Doris is widow of 75 year old age who lives alone in her
house. She has two children who does not stay with her.
■ In last seven months, she has become weak, lost weight
and unable to do ADL.
■ Her deteriorating health was noticed by her postman SAM
because she fails to received her daily mails.
■ Doris was diagnosed with gastrointestinal bleeding.
Additionally, she was noticed with confused state of mind.
She needed further immediate tests for proper diagnosis.
■ However, she was in fear of being diagnosed with cancer
so she refused to go for further tests.

OVERVIEW OF CASE STUDY
■ She even does not agree to communicate the health issue to
her children
■ She was in opinion that she has always taken care of herself
and does not want to give any extra tension to her children.
■ As time passed, over next day, team found that Doris’s
bleeding is repeating
■ There was the great need to for the health care professional to
do something, otherwise it will lead to death of Doris.

Ethical Dilemma In The Case
■ The case study is related to principle of ethics in health care,
which focus on principle of autonomy, beneficence and non-
maleficence.
■ As patient was giving her consent for further test has raised
question to autonomy of patient. According to autonomy
principle, health care staffs are supposed to respect the
decision of patient (Hadjistavropoulos et al., 2016).
■ However, in the case study, if team agrees with her decision,
can lead to harm to the patient and as per principle of non-
maleficence health care team cannot do harm to their patients

ETHICAL DILEMMA IN THE
CASE-CONTINUE
■ The ethical dilemma are being faced the health care team
concerning their action plan.
■ According to principle of beneficence, health care
professional gives treatment with aim of doing good to the
patient (Hadjistavropoulos et al., 2016). If the team goes
for further test to diagnose the illness, it will violates the
autonomy and disrespect of the patient.
■ If the team does not go for tests, patient can die as
internal bleeding has been recurred.

INVOLVEMENT OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLE
In the case study, ethical principle involved are
■ Principle of autonomy – The principle focus on to give
respect to the decision of patient regarding care plan. The
patient is given right to make their own choice
■ Principle of beneficence – This state to do good to the
patient by giving effective treatment and care plan.
■ Being accountable- Health care professional are
responsible for giving effective care (Doody & Noonan,
2016).

INVOLVEMENT OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLE- CONTINUE
■ Principle of non-maleficence – It is related to
elimination of those steps which can pose harm to the
patient.
■ Principle of justice –It involves to give equal and fair
treatment to the patient.
■ Confidentiality- It focus to maintain the privacy of
information of the patient by not sharing to the other
people (MacMillan et al., 2017).

INVOLVEMENT OF REGULATION IN
THE CASE STUDY
■ According to CNA, the nursing regulation involves for
protection of public (Fierlbeck, 2016).
■ The regulation assures that every Canadian will receive
safe, and ethical care from the qualified registered nurse
and team.
■ Canada health act aims to protect, promote and restore
the physical and mental well-being of people of Canada
(MacMillan et al., 2017).
■ However, in the case study, patient is not giving her
consent for further test, health care team are unable to
perform their duty which can be harmful for the health of
patient.

ACTION BY THE NURSE
LEADER
Following action can be taken by the nurse leader
■ Effectively communicate with the patient
■ Try to make the patient understand the harmful consequence
related to her health
■ Nurse leader can instruct the team do follow the decision of
patient as disagreement can make the patient lose trust from
treatment.
■ Instead, nurse leader instructed team to give patient centered
care and along with it make her understand the need of diagnosis

ACTION BY THE NURSE
LEADER■ Nurse leader cannot do harm to the patient, initiation can
be made to gain consent to inform their family member.
■ As per the principle of autonomy, informed decision can
be made which can involves family members.
■ Hence leader nurse inform their family member about the
deteriorating health condition of Doris.

PROS OF ACTION BY NURSE
LEADER■ It will help in diagnosis of health condition of patient.
■ Steps can be made to improve the health condition of the
patient.
■ The regulation of CNA can be maintained by the action of
nurse leader (Foronda, MacWilliam & McArthur, 2016).
■ Patient will be able to understand her health condition and
need of the test
■ She can make better decision for herself