This essay delves into the multifaceted ethical dilemmas surrounding abortion within the nursing profession. It begins by outlining the legal landscape of abortion in the United States, highlighting the varying restrictions across states and the historical context set by Roe v. Wade. The discussion then moves to the core ethical conflicts, such as the clash between a woman's autonomy and the rights of a fetus, and the moral obligations of healthcare providers. The paper explores the perspectives of different scholars like Svenaeus, and Faúndes and Miranda, on personhood, viability, and the role of bioethical principles like autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. It examines how these principles create conflicts in decision-making, especially concerning fetal anomalies and the emotional and psychological consequences for the mother. The essay also considers the perspectives of different researchers and their arguments on the ethics of abortion, including the views of Don Marquis, and Mill. Ultimately, it emphasizes the importance of open communication and calm reflection in navigating these complex ethical challenges within the nursing field.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
