This case study delves into a complex ethical dilemma in nursing, centered around Mrs. Pearl, a patient whose daughter, holding power of attorney, objects to a pacemaker. The assignment applies the ethical decision-making model, identifying the ethical problem, collecting information, developing and analyzing alternative solutions, selecting the best course of action, and creating implementation strategies. The core ethical principles of nursing—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, fidelity, and veracity—are examined in the context of the case. The study presents three alternatives: respecting the daughter's wishes, convincing the daughter of the treatment's necessity, and overriding the daughter's objection. The chosen solution involves educating the daughter about the patient's condition and the importance of the treatment. Legal considerations, professional standards, and the nurse's gut feeling are used to justify the decision, emphasizing the need for informed consent and adherence to ethical and legal requirements. The case highlights the importance of balancing patient autonomy with the duty to provide beneficial care.