TIC1201 Discrete Structures (AY2019/20) Midterm Exam Solution

Verified

Added on  2022/08/22

|4
|651
|28
Quiz and Exam
AI Summary
Document Page
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
MIDTERM EXAM
STUDENT ID:
[Pick the date]
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Question 1
The requisite truth table is shown below.
p q p→ q q → p • p • p q (p→ q ) (q → p )
T T T T F F T
T F F T F F F
F T T F T T F
F F T T T F T
From the above truth table, it is evident that the premise does not lead to the conclusion and
hence the argument in the given case would be considered as invalid.
Question 2
a) The list of all ordered pairs of relation take would contain the following elements.
(Adi, TIC1201)
(Adi, TIC2001)
(Deepak, TIC1201)
(Deepak, TMA2102)
(Lily, TIC2001)
(Lily, TIC1001)
(Lily, TMA2102)
b) False since certain input values have more than one output
c) True since (TIC1001,SR7) belongs to the relation held_in.
d) The list of all ordered pairs of relation take would contain the following elements.
(SR1,Lily)
(LT15, Adi)
(LT15, Lily)
(SR7, Lily)
(LT15, Deepak)
(SR10, Lily)
(SR7, Adi)
(SR1, Adi)
(SR10, Deepak)
Question 3
a) True
Document Page
b) False
c) False
d) True
e) False
f) True
Question 4
2.1 – Substitute n = 0 in the expression 9n – 4n
2.2 – Simplify using simple algebra i.e. 90 – 40 = 1-1 = 0
2.3 – 0 when divided by 5 would leave a remainder of 0
3.1.2 = 9k+1 – 4k+1 = 9k*91 – 4k*41 (Using law of exponents)
3.1.3 = 9k*91 – 4k*41 = (5+4)*9k – 4*4k
3.1.4 = 4*9k -4*4k + 5*9k = 4(9k – 4k) +5*9k (Using splitting of terms)
3.1.5 It is known that 9k – 4k is perfectly divisible by 5 and hence can be reflected as 5p
where p is any natural number
3.1.6 = 4*(5p) +5*9k (By substituting of 9k – 4k as 5p)
3.1.7 – Both the above terms are divisible by 5 and hence the remainder would be zero.
Question 5
1.3 By raising both sides to the power of b, we get 5b = 3a by basic algebra
1.4 In order for the above equality relation to be satisfied, it is essential that 5 must be
divisible by 3
1.5 However, 3 and 5 are both co-prime numbers which implies that the only common factor
for the two numbers is 1.
1.6 Therefore, the initial assumption of log35 being rational is wrong.
Question 6
The numbers on Aiken’s and Dueet’s foreheads would be 17 and 18 respectively.
The explanation for the above is as follows. If Dueet sees 17 on Aiken’s forehead, then this is
essentially the product of two numbers. However, 17 being a prime number has only two
factors namely 1 and 17. Thus, it is possible for Dueet to guess the number written on his
Document Page
forehead which would be 1+17 = 18. On the contrary, Aiken would see the number 18 as sum
which can be produced in a host of ways such as (12+6), (9+9), (8+10), (17+1). Without
knowing the number written on Aiken’s forehead, it would be impossible for him to ascertain
the correct pair of numbers.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]